International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Acar, O. (2024). Modelling of the relationships between students’ grade-level, epistemic beliefs, metacognition, and science achievement in low and high-achieving schools. Educational Studies, 50(4), 558-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2122702
• Aisha, B., Abedalaziz, N. A. M., Ahmad, M., & Satti, U. (2018). Factors affecting differential equation problem solving ability of students at pre-university level: A conceptual model. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 13-24.
• Altaf, S., Bibi, A., Daad, H., & Ahmad, M. (2023). When and why the role of mastery goal becomes prominent in science students’ academic achievement at secondary school level. KEPES, 21(2), 156-167.
• Ambaryani, S. E., & Putranta, H. (2022). Improving learners’ metacognitive skills with self-regulated learning based problem-solving. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1528a
• Apostol, G. C. (2023). Self-regulated learning strategies, academic motivation, perception of technology and mathematics performance of the senior high school STEM students. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 6(1), 1-4.
• Bibi, A., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Goal orientations, self-regulated learning strategies and problem-solving: A mediational analysis. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.02
• Bibi, A., Ahmad, M., Shahid, W., Zamri, S. N. S., & Abedalaziz, N. A. M. (2019). An evolving research to tackle teaching and learning challenges during differential equations course: A combination of non-routine problems and teacher training. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5777
• Bibi, A., Akhtar, S., & Ahmed, S. Z. (2024). Problem-solving based learning in STEM education: Role of epistemological and motivational beliefs along with self-regulated learning strategies. International Journal of Academic Research for Humanities, 4(2), 106-115.
• Bibi, A., Zamri, S. N. A. S., Abedalaziz, N. A. M., Ahmad, M., & Dad, H. (2018). Role of students’context familiarity in differential equations problem solving at pre university level. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 48-57.
• Chen, J., & Turner, J. E. (2024). Exploring the relationships among college students’ epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and use of problem-solving strategies in engineering design contexts. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, Article 101615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101615
• Creswell, J. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
• Duchesne, S., Larose, S., & Feng, B. (2019). Achievement goals and engagement with academic work in early high school: Does seeking help from teachers matter? The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 222-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617737626
• Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
• Epler, C. M. (2011). The relationship between implicit theories of intelligence, epistemological beliefs, and the teaching practices of in-service teachers: A mixed methods study [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University].
• Fadlelmula, F. K., Cakiroglu, E., & Sungur, S. (2015). Developing a structural model on the relationship among motivational beliefs, self-regulated learning strategies, and achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1355-1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9499-4
• Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324-326. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.7.5.0324
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2021a). Exploring pre-university students’ mathematical connections when solving calculus application problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(6), 912-936. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1729429
• García-García, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2021b). Pre-university students’ mathematical connections when sketching the graph of derivative and antiderivative functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00286-x
• Guo, J., Hu, X., Marsh, H. W., & Pekrun, R. (2022). Relations of epistemic beliefs with motivation, achievement, and aspirations in science: Generalizability across 72 societies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), Article 734. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000660
• Guven, B., & Cabakcor, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing mathematical problem-solving achievement of seventh grade Turkish students. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.003
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
• Hoffmann, A. O., & Birnbrich, C. (2012). The impact of fraud prevention on bank-customer relationships: An empirical investigation in retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(5), 390-407. https://doi.org/doi/10.1108/02652321211247435
• Jablonski, S. (2023). Real objects as a reason for mathematical reasoning–A comparison of different task settings. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(4), Article em0758. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13859
• Jamil, M., Hafeez, F. A., & Muhammad, N. (2024). Critical thinking development for 21^st century: Analysis of physics curriculum. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i1.45
• Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Jak, S., & Kester, L. (2019). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100292
• Jarvela, S., & Hadwin, A. (2024). Triggers for self-regulated learning: A conceptual framework for advancing multimodal research about SRL. Learning and Individual Differences, 115, Article 102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102526
• Kandemir, M. A., Eryilmaz, N., & Shelley, M. (2024). A study of factors and their influence on mathematics-related beliefs and performance in Turkey. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1376521
• Karatas, H., & Erden, M. (2017). Predictors of academic motivation: Epistemological beliefs, learning approaches and problem solving skills. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.04.001
• Losenno, K. M., Muis, K. R., Munzar, B., Denton, C. A., & Perry, N. E. (2020). The dynamic roles of cognitive reappraisal and self-regulated learning during mathematics problem solving: A mixed methods investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101869
• Malik, M. I., Nadeem, M., & Adil, S. M. (2022, May). Exploring the determinants of female early age marriages in Pakistan. In Women's Studies International Forum (Vol. 92, p. 102594). Pergamon.
• McAlinden, M., & Noyes, A. (2019). Mathematics in the disciplines at the transition to university. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 38(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry004
• Memon, M. A., Ramayah, T., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2021). PLS-SEM statistical programs: A review. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.5(1)06
• Msomi, A. M., & Bansilal, S. (2022). Analysis of students’ errors and misconceptions in solving linear ordinary differential equations using the method of Laplace transform. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11474
• Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317-377. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003317
• Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., Denton, C. A., & Losenno, K. M. (2021). Epistemic emotions and epistemic cognition predict critical thinking about socio-scientific issues. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.669908
• Muñoz, E. C., Saadati, F., & Huencho, A. (2024). Impact of school experiences on the beliefs and instructional practices of future mathematics teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(4), Article em0793. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15201
• O’meara, N., Prendergast, M., Harbison, L., & O’hara, C. (2017). Is teacher knowledge affecting students’ transition from primary to second-level mathematics education? [Paper presentation]. The CERME 10.
• Oh, P. S. (2024). How a student uses knowledge as a resource to solve scientific problems: A case study on science learning as rediscovery. Science & Education, 33(1), 213-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00350-2
• Pedersen, I. F., & Haavold, P. Ø. (2023). Students’ mathematical beliefs and motivation in the context of inquiry-based mathematics teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(8), 1649-1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2189171
• Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, teaching, and learning problem solving. John Wiley.
• Quvvatov, B. (2024). Construction of special models through differential equations and practical solutions. Solution of Social Problems in Management and Economy, 3(1), 108-115.
• Rastegar, A., Jahromi, R. G., Haghighi, A. S., & Akbari, A. R. (2010). The relation of epistemological beliefs and mathematics achievement: The mediating role of achievement goals, mathematics self-efficacy, and cognitive engagement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 791-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.186
• Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), Article em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
• Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2023). “We learn it [mathematics] at school so one thinks that one will use it …”: Learners’ beliefs about relevance and importance of learning mathematics. Acta Didactica Norden, 17(3), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.10308
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), Article 498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
• Schommer, M. (2019). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25-40). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812068-2
• Schommer-Aikins, M., & Duell, O. K. (2013). Domain specific and general epistemological beliefs. Their effects on mathematics. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 31(2), 330-330. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.31.2.170911
• Sintema, E. J., & Mosimege, M. (2023). High school students’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving: A cluster analysis. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(1), 68-83.
• Snyder, L. G., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching critical thinking and problem solving skills. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 50(2), Article 90.
• Soltani, A., & Askarizadeh, G. (2021). How students’ conceptions of learning science are related to their motivational beliefs and self-regulation. Learning and Motivation, 73, Article 101707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101707
• Stockton, J. C. (2010). A study of the relationships between epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning among advanced placement calculus students in the context of mathematical problem solving [Doctoral dissertation, Kennesaw State University].
• Teschl, G. (2024). Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems (vol. 140). American Mathematical Society.
• Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, L. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21^st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
• Tjoe, H. (2019). “Looking back” to solve differently: Familiarity, fluency, and flexibility. In P. Liljedahl, & M. Santos-Trigo (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Solving: Current themes, trends, and research (pp. 3-20). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_1
• Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM, 52, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
• Wheeler, D. L. (2007). The development and construct validation of the epistemological beliefs survey for mathematics [PhD thesis, Oklahoma State University].

APA

Bibi, A., Aurangzeb, W., Tabassum, F., & Ahmad, M. (2025). Modelling the relationship among calculus scholars’ beliefs, critical thinking, elaboration, and problem-solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(1), em0808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15737

Vancouver

Bibi A, Aurangzeb W, Tabassum F, Ahmad M. Modelling the relationship among calculus scholars’ beliefs, critical thinking, elaboration, and problem-solving. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(1):em0808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15737

AMA

Bibi A, Aurangzeb W, Tabassum F, Ahmad M. Modelling the relationship among calculus scholars’ beliefs, critical thinking, elaboration, and problem-solving. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(1), em0808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15737

Chicago

Bibi, Aisha, Wajeeha Aurangzeb, Farkhanda Tabassum, and Mushtaq Ahmad. "Modelling the relationship among calculus scholars’ beliefs, critical thinking, elaboration, and problem-solving". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2025 20 no. 1 (2025): em0808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15737

Harvard

Bibi, A., Aurangzeb, W., Tabassum, F., and Ahmad, M. (2025). Modelling the relationship among calculus scholars’ beliefs, critical thinking, elaboration, and problem-solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(1), em0808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15737

MLA

Bibi, Aisha et al. "Modelling the relationship among calculus scholars’ beliefs, critical thinking, elaboration, and problem-solving". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 1, 2025, em0808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15737