International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Adams, A. M. (2005). Working memory and special educational needs. Educational and Child Psychology, 22, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408315815
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is–or might be–the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
• Baumert, J., & Schümer, G. (2001). Familiäre Lebensverhältnisse, Bildungsbeteiligung und Kompetenzerwerb [Family living conditions, educational participation and skills acquisition]. In D. PISA-Konsortium (Ed.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 323-410). Leske & Budrich. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10
• Beswick, K. (2007). Influencing teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics for numeracy to students with mathematics learning difficulties. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 3-20.
• Blazar, D., & Archer, C. (2020). Teaching to support students with diverse academic needs. Educational Researcher, 49(5), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20931226
• Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics. Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606365
• Borko, H., & Potari, D. (Eds.). (2024). Teachers of mathematics working and learning in collaborative groups. The 25^th ICMI study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56488-8
• Burkhardt, H., & Swan, M. (2017). Design and development for large-scale improvement. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13^th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 177-200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_12
• Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M., Kramer, S., Hiebert, J., & Bakker, A. (2020). Maximizing the quality of learning opportunities for every student. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0005
• Callahan, R. M. (2005). Tracking and high school english learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal Summer, 42(2), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002305
• Century, J., & Cassata, A. (2016). Implementation research: Finding common ground on what, how, why, where, and who. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 169-215. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16665332
• Chambers, S. C., & Callaway, P. (2008). High and low implementers of content literacy instruction: Portraits of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1739-1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.020
• Charalambous, E., Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2018). Promoting quality and equity in socially disadvantaged schools: A group-randomisation study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.001
• Clements, M. A. K., Keitel, C., Bishop, A. J., Kilpatrick, J. & Leung, F. K. S. (2013). From the few to the many: Historical perspectives on who should learn mathematics. In M. A. K. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 7-40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_1
• Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
• Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178466
• Damerow, P., Dunkley, M. E., Nebres, B. F., & Werry, B. (1984). Mathematics for all: Problems of cultural sensitivity and unequal distribution of mathematical education and future prospective on mathematics teaching for the majority. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000075946
• de Araujo, Z., & Smith, E. (2022). Examining English language leaners’ learning needs through the lens of algebra curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10081-w
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
• DIME. (2007). Culture, race, power in mathematics education. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 405-433). Information Age.
• Faragher, R., Hill, J., & Clarke, B. (2016). Inclusive practices in mathematics education. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison, & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012-2015 (pp. 119-141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_7
• Gathercole, S. E., & Alloway, T. P. (2008). Working memory and learning: A practical guide for teachers. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370509-9.00179-0
• Gräsel, C. (2010). Stichwort: Transfer und Transferforschung im Bildungsbereich [Keyword: Transfer and transfer research in education]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 13, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-010-0109-8
• Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., & Raatz, U. (2002). C-test: An overview. In J. A. Coleman, R. Grotjahn, & U. Raatz (Eds.), University language testing and the C-test (pp. 93-114). AKS Finkenstaedt.
• Grünkorn, J., Klieme, E., Praetorius, A.-K., & Schreyer, P. (2020). Mathematikunterricht im internationalen Vergleich. Ergebnisse aus der TALIS-Videostudie Deutschland [Mathematics teaching in international comparison. Results from the TALIS video study Germany]. DIPF | Leibniz Institute.
• Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2011). Implementing change. Pearson.
• Hasselhorn, M., & Gold, A. (2013). Pädagogische Psychologie. Erfolgreiches Lernen und Lehren [Educational psychology: Successful learning and teaching]. Kohlhammer. https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-023965-4
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., Wagner, D., & Pimm, D. (2011). Equity in discourse for mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4
• Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
• Jackson, K., & Wilson, J. (2012). Supporting African American students’ learning of mathematics: A problem of practice. Urban Education, 47(2), 354-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911429083
• Janney, R. E., & Snell, M. E. (2006). Modifying schoolwork in inclusive classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_3
• Karsenty, R. (2010). Nonprofessional mathematics tutoring for low-achieving students in secondary schools: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9223-z
• Karsenty, R., & Brodie, K. (2023). Researching “what went wrong” in professional development (PD) for mathematics teachers: What makes it so important, and so difficult? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(5), 573-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09599-y
• Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Jonen, A., Vehmeyer, J., & Möller, K. (2016). The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000041
• Kollosche, D., Marcone, R., Knigge, M., Godoy Penteado, M., & Skovsmose, O. (2019). Inclusive mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11518-0
• Kuhl, J., Hecht, T., & Vossen, A. (2021). Evidenzbasierte Förderung bei Lernschwierigkeiten [Evidence-based support for learning difficulties]. In J. Kuhl, A. Vossen, N. Hartung, & C. Wittich (Eds.), Evidenzbasierte Förderung bei Lernschwierigkeiten in der Grundschule (pp. 40-49). Ernst Reinhardt.
• Kuhl, J., Prediger, S., Schulze, S., Wittich, C., & Pulz, I. (2022). Inklusiver Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe: Eine Pilotstudie zur Prozentrechnung [Inclusive mathematics teaching in secondary school: A pilot study on percentage calculation]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 50(2), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-021-00125-8
• Leong, Y. H., Tay, E. G., Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., & Yap, R. A. S. (2019). Concretisations: A support for teachers to carry out instructional innovations in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(2), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9868-5
• Mevarech, Z., Terkieltaub, S., Vinberger, T., & Nevet, V. (2010). The effects of meta-cognitive instruction on third and sixth graders solving word problems. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 42(2), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0244-y
• Morales, H. Jr, Chval, K. B., DiNapoli, J., & Pizzi, T. G. (2024). Meaning-making systems: A multimodal analysis of a Latinx student’s mathematical learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(2), Article em0773. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14363
• Moschkovich, J. (2013). Principles and guidelines for equitable mathematics teaching practices and materials for English language learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v6i1a204
• Moser Opitz, E., Freesemann, O., Grob, U., & Prediger, S. (2016). BASIS-MATH-G 4+-5. Gruppentest zur Basisdiagnostik Mathematik für das vierte Quartal der 4. Klasse und für die 5. Klasse (test und manual) [BASIS-MATH-G 4+-5. Group test for basic diagnostics in mathematics for the fourth quarter of the 4^th grade and for the 5^th grade (test and manual)]. Hogrefe.
• Myers, J. A., Wang, J., Brownell, M. T., & Gagnon, J. C. (2015). Mathematics interventions for students with learning disabilities (LD) in secondary school: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 13, 207-235.
• OECD. (2016). Low-performing students: Why they fall behind and how to help them succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264250246-en
• Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421-481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065004421
• Penuel, W. R., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21001
• Pöhler, B., George, A. C., Prediger, S., & Weinert, H. (2017). Are word problems really more difficult for students with low language proficiency? Investigating percent items in different formats and types. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 667-687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/641
• Pöhler, B., & Prediger, S. (2015). Intertwining lexical and conceptual learning trajectories - A design research study on dual macro-scaffolding towards percentages. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1697-1722. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1497a
• Pöhler, B., Prediger, S., & Strucksberg, J. (2018). Prozente verstehen–Fach- und sprachintegrierte, inklusive Unterrichtseinheit in Basis- und Regelfassung [Understanding percentages–Subject and language integrated, inclusive teaching unit in basic and standard versions]. https://sima.dzlm.de/sites/simams/files/uploads/sima7-001-prozente-ue-regelfassung_230402.pdf
• Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2015). Readiness-based differentiation in primary school mathematics: Expert recommendations and teacher self-assessment. Frontline Learning Research, 3(2), 90-116. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i2.163
• Prediger, S., & Buró, R. (2024). Fifty ways to work with students’ diverse abilities? A video study on inclusive teaching practices in secondary mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(2), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1925361
• Prediger, S., & Neugebauer, P. (2023). Can students with different language backgrounds profit equally from a language-responsive instructional approach for percentages? Differential effectiveness in a field trial. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 25(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1919817
• Prediger, S., Kuhl, J., Büscher, C. & Buró, S. (2020). Mathematik inklusiv lehren lernen: Entwicklung eines forschungsbasierten interdisziplinären Fortbildungskonzepts [Learning to teach mathematics inclusively: Development of a research-based interdisciplinary training concept]. Journal für Psychologie, 27(2), 288-312. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2019-2-288
• Prediger, S., Strucksberg, J., Ademmer, C., Pöhler, B., Buró, S., Kuhl, J., Wittich, C., Pulz, I., & Schulze, S. (2019). Matilda-Handreichung zum inklusiven Prozente-Unterricht [Matilda handout for inclusive percentage teaching]. Technische Universität / DZLM.
• Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. Journal of Educational Research, 2, 857-867. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90069-4
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
• Roesken-Winter, B., Stahnke, R., Prediger, S., & Gasteiger, H. (2021). Towards a research base for implementation strategies addressing mathematics teachers and facilitators. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1007-1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01220-x
• Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Harvard University Press.
• Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., & Nasir, N. S. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 55-79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009935100676
• Scherer, P., Beswick, K., DeBlois, L., Healy, L., & Moser Opitz, E. (2016). Assistance of students with mathematical learning difficulties. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 48(5), 633-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0800-1
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Stanat, P., Schipolowski, S., Mahler, N., Weirich, S., & Henschel, S. (2019). IQB Bildungstrend 2017: Kompetenzen in den Fächern Deutsch und Mathematik am Ende der Sekundarstufe I im zweiten Ländervergleich [IQB education trend 2017: Competencies in the subjects German and mathematics at the end of secondary level I in the second country comparison]. Waxmann.
• Thoemmes, F., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.540475
• Turner, E., Roth McDuffie, A., Sugimoto, A., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., Drake, C., Foote, M., Stoehr, K., & Witters, A. (2019). A study of early career teachers’ practices related to language and language diversity during mathematics instruction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1564967
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc
• Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2020). An analysis of research on inclusive education: A systematic search and meta review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 675-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012
• Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, T. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
• Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639
• Wiley, J., Sanchez, C. A., & Jaeger, A. L. (2014). The individual differences in working memory capacity principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 598-619). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.029

APA

Prediger, S., Kuhl, J., Schulze, S., Wittich, C., Pulz, I., Ademmer, C., & Büscher, C. (2025). How to enable teachers to enhance all students’ understanding of percentages? A quasi-experimental field trial. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0816. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15899

Vancouver

Prediger S, Kuhl J, Schulze S, Wittich C, Pulz I, Ademmer C, et al. How to enable teachers to enhance all students’ understanding of percentages? A quasi-experimental field trial. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(2):em0816. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15899

AMA

Prediger S, Kuhl J, Schulze S, et al. How to enable teachers to enhance all students’ understanding of percentages? A quasi-experimental field trial. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(2), em0816. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15899

Chicago

Prediger, Susanne, Jan Kuhl, Sarah Schulze, Claudia Wittich, Imke Pulz, Claudia Ademmer, and Christian Büscher. "How to enable teachers to enhance all students’ understanding of percentages? A quasi-experimental field trial". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2025 20 no. 2 (2025): em0816. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15899

Harvard

Prediger, S., Kuhl, J., Schulze, S., Wittich, C., Pulz, I., Ademmer, C., and Büscher, C. (2025). How to enable teachers to enhance all students’ understanding of percentages? A quasi-experimental field trial. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0816. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15899

MLA

Prediger, Susanne et al. "How to enable teachers to enhance all students’ understanding of percentages? A quasi-experimental field trial". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 2, 2025, em0816. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15899