Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task

Landy Elena Sosa Moguel; Eddie Aparicio Landa; Guadalupe Cabañas-Sánchez

doi:10.29333/iejme/5769

Full Text (PDF)

Landy Elena Sosa Moguel ¹ ² ^* , Eddie Aparicio Landa ¹ ², Guadalupe Cabañas-Sánchez ¹

More Detail

¹ Autonomous University of Guerrero, MEXICO² Autonomous University of Yucatan, MEXICO^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper reports on the characterization of the inductive reasoning used by middle school mathematics teachers to solve a task of generalization of a quadratic pattern. The data was collected from individual interviews and the written answers to the generalization task. The analysis was based on the representations and justifications used to move from particular cases to the formulation of the general rule. Three processes characterize the inductive reasoning of the mathematics teachers to obtain a general rule: observation of regularities, establishment of a pattern and formulation of a generalization; while some teachers revealed problems in moving from the observation of regularities to the formulation of a generalization. Therefore, some difficulties in generalizing associated with these processes are also mentioned.

Keywords

inductive processes
task
mathematical generalization
teachers

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 14, Issue 3, October 2019, 563-581

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769

Publication date: 10 May 2019

Article Views: 3237

Article Downloads: 2607

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alajmi, A. H. (2016). Algebraic Generalization Strategies Used by Kuwaiti Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1517–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9657-y
Arslan, C., Göcmencelebi, S. I., & Tapan, M. S. (2009). Learning and reasoning styles of pre service teachers: inductive or deductive reasoning on science and mathematics related to their learning style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2460–2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.432
Bills, L., & Rowland, T. (1999). Examples, generalisation and proof. Advances in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794809909461549
Callejo, M. L., & Zapatera, A. (2017). Prospective primary teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of pattern generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 309-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9343-1
Cañadas, M. C., & Castro, E. (2007). A proposal of categorisation for analysing inductive reasoning. PNA, 1(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000032542.40308.65
Cañadas, M. C., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2008). Patrones, generalización y estrategias inductivas de estudiantes de 3° y 4° de educación secundaria obligatoria en el problema de las baldosas. PNA, 2(3), 137-151.
Cañadas, M. C., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2009). Utilización de un modelo para describir el razonamiento inductivo de los estudiantes en la resolución de problemas. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 261–278.
Castro, E., Cañadas, M., & Molina, M. (2010). El Razonamiento Inductivo como Generador de Conocimiento Matemático. UNO, 54, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Christou, C., & Papageorgiou, E. (2007). A framework of mathematics inductive reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.009
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883389
Davydov, V. (1990). Type of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. In J. Kilpatrick (Ed.), Soviet studies in mathematics education (Vol. 2). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davydov, V. (2008). Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25-41). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_2
Dreyfus, T., Nardi, E., & Leikin, R. (2012). Forms of proof and proving. In Hanna, G. and Villiers, M. (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education– The 19th international commission for mathematics instruction study (pp. 111–120). New York: Springer.
El Mouhayar, R. (2018). Exploring teachers’ attention to students’ responses in pattern generalization tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9406-6
El Mouhayar, R., & Jurdak, M. E. (2013). Teachers’ ability to identify and explain students’ actions in near and far figural pattern generalization tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9434-6
Glaser, R., & Pellegrino, J. (1982). Improving the skills of learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased (pp. 197-212). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Haverty, L., Koedinger, K., Klahr, D., & Alibali, M. (2000). Solving Inductive Reasoning Problems in Mathematics: Not-so-Trivial Pursuit. Cognitive Science, 24(2), 249–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(00)00019-7
Hayes, B. K., Heit, E., & Swendsen, H. (2010). Inductive reasoning. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Cognitive science, 1(2), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.44
Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L. A., Loong, E., & Widjaja, W. (2015). A framework for primary teachers’ perceptions of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.005
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 65-97). New York: MacMillan.
Klauer, K. J. (1990). A process theory of inductive reasoning tested by the teaching of domain-specific thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 5(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172682
Klauer, K. J. (1996). Teaching inductive reasoning: some theory and three experimental studies. Learning and Instruction, 6(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00015-1
Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (1994). Cognitive training for children. A developmental program of inductive reasoning and problem solving. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (2008). Inductive Reasoning: A Training Approach. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 85–123. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313402
Klauer, K. J., Willmes, K., & Phye, G. D. (2002). Inducing Inductive Reasoning: Does It Transfer to Fluid Intelligence? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1079
Küchemann, D., & Hoyles, C. (2009). From empirical to structural reasoning in mathematics: tacking changes over time. In D. Stylianou, M. Blanton & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning of proofs across the grades (pp. 171-190). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882009-10
Leighton, J., & Sternberg, R. (2004). The Nature of Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manfreda, V., Slapar, M., & Hodnik, T. (2012). Comparison of competences in inductive reasoning between primary teachers’ students and mathematics teachers’ students. In B. Maj-Tatsis & K. Tatsis (Eds.), Generalization in mathematics at all educational levels. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.
Melhuish, K., Thanheiser, E., & Guyot, L. (2018). Elementary school teachers’ noticing of essential mathematical reasoning forms: justification and generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9408-4
Molnár, G. (2011). Playful fostering of 6-to 8-year-old students’ inductive reasoning. Thinking skills and Creativity, 6(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.05.002
Molnár, G., Greiff, S., & Csapó, B. (2013). Inductive reasoning, domain specific and complex problem solving: Relations and development. Thinking skills and Creativity, 9, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.002
Mousa, M. (2017). The Influence of Inductive Reasoning Thinking Skill on Enhancing Performance. International Humanities Studies, 4(3), 37–48.
Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544
Murawska, J. M., & Zollman, A. (2015). Taking it to the next level: Students using inductive reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 20(7), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.20.7.0416
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Neubert, G. A., & Binko, J. B. (1992). Inductive reasoning in the secondary classroom. Washington DC: National Education Association.
Papageorgiou, E. (2009). Towards a Teaching Approach for Improving Mathematics Inductive Reasoning Problem Solving. In Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M. and Sakonidis, H. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 313–320). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it. A new aspect of mathematical method. New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.
Pólya, G. (1967). Le découverte des mathématiques. Paris: DUNOD.
Reid, D. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/749867
Reid, D., & Knipping, C. (2010). Proof in Mathematics Education. Research, Learning and Teaching. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 297–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9222-0
Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2003). The Effects of Numerical and Figural Cues on the Induction Processes of Preservice Elementary Teachers. In Pateman, N., Dougherty, B. and Zilliox, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Held Jointly with the 25th PME-NA Conference (pp. 63–70). Honolulu, HI.
Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2007). Abduction-induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.001
Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2016). Middle school students’ patterning performance on semi-free generalization tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.05.002
Secretaría de Educación Pública (2011). Programas de estudio 2011. Guía para el maestro. Educación básica secundaria. México: SEP.
Sriraman, B., & Adrian, H. (2004). The Pedagogical Value and the Interdisciplinary Nature of Inductive Processes in Forming Generalizations : Reflections from the Classroom. Interchange, 35(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698891
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning-and-proving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1463-1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9409-9
Tomic, W. (1995). Training in Inductive Reasoning and Problem Solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1036
Yeşildere, S., & Akkoç, H. (2010). Algebraic generalization strategies of number patterns used by pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1142–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.162

How to cite this article

APA

Sosa Moguel, L. E., Aparicio Landa, E., & Cabañas-Sánchez, G. (2019). Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769

Vancouver

Sosa Moguel LE, Aparicio Landa E, Cabañas-Sánchez G. Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2019;14(3):563-81. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769

AMA

Sosa Moguel LE, Aparicio Landa E, Cabañas-Sánchez G. Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2019;14(3), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769

Chicago

Sosa Moguel, Landy Elena, Eddie Aparicio Landa, and Guadalupe Cabañas-Sánchez. "Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2019 14 no. 3 (2019): 563-581. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769

Harvard

Sosa Moguel, L. E., Aparicio Landa, E., and Cabañas-Sánchez, G. (2019). Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), pp. 563-581. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769

MLA

Sosa Moguel, Landy Elena et al. "Characterization of Inductive Reasoning in Middle School Mathematics Teachers in a Generalization Task". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019, pp. 563-581. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5769