International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Artigue, M., & Winsløw, C. (2010). International comparative studies on mathematics education: A viewpoint from the anthropological theory of didactics. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 30(1), 47-82.
• Bardini, C., & Stacey, K. (2006). Students’ conceptions of m and c: How to tune a linear function. In Proceedings 30^th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague (vol.2, pp. 113-120).
• Biehler, R. (2005). Reconstruction of meaning as a didactical task: The concept of function as an example. In J. Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, O. Skovsmose, & P. Valero (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education. Mathematics education library, vol 37 (pp. 61-81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24040-3_5
• Bosch, M. (2018). Study and research paths: A model for inquiry. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813272880_0210
• Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2006). Twenty-five years of the didactic transposition. ICMI Bulletin, 58(58), 51-65.
• Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2014). Introduction to the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, & S. Predinger (Eds.), Networking of theories as a research practice in mathematics education (pp. 67-83). Springer. https://doi.org/0.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_5
• Bosch, M., & Winsløw, C. (2020). The external didactic transposition of mathematics at university level: Dilemmas and challenges. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 22(4), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2020v22i4p373-386
• Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4^th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 21-30).
• Chevallard, Y. (2015). Teaching mathematics in tomorrow’s society: A case for an oncoming counter paradigm. In S. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12^th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 173-187). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_13
• Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the anthropological theory of the didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71-114.
• Chevallard, Y., & Bosch, M. (2020). Didactic transposition in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 214-217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_48
• Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M., & Kim, S. (2015). What is a theory according to the anthropological theory of the didactic? In K. Krainer, & N. Vondrová (Eds.), CERME 9-9^th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2614-2620).
• Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273661
• Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Gravemeijer, K., Boon, P., & Reed, H. (2012). Tool use and the development of the function concept: From repeated calculations to functional thinking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1243-1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9329-0
• Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
• González-Martin, A. S., Giraldo, V., & Souto, A. M. (2013). The introduction of real numbers in secondary education: An institutional analysis of textbooks. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 230-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.803778
• Hidayah, M., & Forgasz, H. (2020). A comparison of mathematical tasks types used in Indonesian and Australian textbooks based on geometry contents. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11754.385-404
• Kemdikbud. (2024). Capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah pada kurikulum merdeka [Learning outcomes in early childhood education, elementary education, and secondary education in the independent curriculum]. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/rujukan/regulasi-kurikulum-merdeka
• Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: A brief survey. The College Mathematics Journal, 20(4), Article 282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1989.11973245
• Kleiner, I. (1993). Functions: Historical and pedagogical aspects. Science & Education, 2, 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00592206
• Lundberg, A. L. V., & Kilhamn, C. (2018). Transposition of knowledge: Encountering proportionality in an algebra task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 559-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9781-3
• Mailizar, M., Alafaleq, M., & Fan, L. (2014). A historical overview of mathematics curriculum reform and development in modern Indonesia. Teaching Innovations, 27(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije1403058M
• Markovits, Z., Eylon, B.-S., & Bruckheimer, M. (1986). Functions today and yesterday. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(2), 18-28.
• Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks: An empirical approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040409.63571.56
• MEXT. (2008). Course of study for junior high school. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/youryou/eiyaku/1298356.htm
• MEXT. (2018). Course of study for junior high school. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/new-cs/1384661.htm
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Minnich, C. A., Stanco, G. M., Arora, A., Centurino, V. A. S., & Castle, C. E. (2012). TIMSS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in mathematics and science. Volume 1: AK. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
• Okamoto, K., Koseki, K., Morisugi, K., & Sasaki, T. (2013). Gateway to the future, math 1. Keirinkan.
• Okamoto, K., Koseki, K., Morisugi, K., & Sasaki, T. (2014). Gateway to the future, math 2. Keirinkan.
• Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: Two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0526-2
• Ponte, J. P. (1992). The history of the concept of function and some educational implications. The Mathematics Educator, 3(2).
• Rolfes, T., Roth, J., & Schnotz, W. (2018). Effects of tables, bar charts, and graphs on solving function tasks. Journal Fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 39(1), 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-017-0124-x
• Ronda, E. (2015). Growth points in linking representations of function: A research-based framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9631-1
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
• Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding the notion of function. The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, 25, 23-58.
• Sosniak, L. A., & Perlman, C. L. (1990). Secondary education by the book. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(5), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220502
• Takahashi, A. (2006). Characteristics of Japanese mathematics lessons. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25(1), 37-44.
• Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2020). Comparing the lower secondary textbooks of Japan and England: A praxeological analysis of symmetry and transformations in geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 791-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09982-3
• Tall, D. (1993). Success and failure in mathematics: The flexible meaning of symbols as process and concept. Mathematics Teaching, 14, 6-10.
• Tohir, M., As’ari, A. R., Anam, A. C., & Taufiq, I. (2023). Matematika SMP/MTs kelas VIII [Mathematics for grade 8 lower secondary school]. Ministry of Education Indonesia.
• Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0_8
• Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2005). Not everything is proportional: Effects of age and problem type on propensities for overgeneralization. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_3
• Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.20.4.0356
• Wijayanti, D. (2018). Two notions of ‘linear function’in lower secondary school and missed opportunities for students’ first meeting with functions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1441

APA

Utami, N. S., Mizoguchi, T., Prabawanto, S., & Suryadi, D. (2025). A praxeological analysis of functions in lower secondary school: Comparing the textbooks in Japan and Indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15818

Vancouver

Utami NS, Mizoguchi T, Prabawanto S, Suryadi D. A praxeological analysis of functions in lower secondary school: Comparing the textbooks in Japan and Indonesia. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(2):em0814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15818

AMA

Utami NS, Mizoguchi T, Prabawanto S, Suryadi D. A praxeological analysis of functions in lower secondary school: Comparing the textbooks in Japan and Indonesia. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(2), em0814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15818

Chicago

Utami, Nadya Syifa, Tatsuya Mizoguchi, Sufyani Prabawanto, and Didi Suryadi. "A praxeological analysis of functions in lower secondary school: Comparing the textbooks in Japan and Indonesia". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2025 20 no. 2 (2025): em0814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15818

Harvard

Utami, N. S., Mizoguchi, T., Prabawanto, S., and Suryadi, D. (2025). A praxeological analysis of functions in lower secondary school: Comparing the textbooks in Japan and Indonesia. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15818

MLA

Utami, Nadya Syifa et al. "A praxeological analysis of functions in lower secondary school: Comparing the textbooks in Japan and Indonesia". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 2, 2025, em0814. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15818