International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Akale, M.A.G (1997). The Relationship between Attitude and Achievement among Biology Students in Senior Secondary Schools. Journal of Science and Movement Education 2, 77 – 85.
• Akinsola, M.K. (1994) Comparative Effects of Mastery Learning and Enhanced Mastery Learning Strategies on Students’ Achievement and Self-Concept Mathematics. Ph. D. Thesis, U.I. Ibadan.
• Balogun T.A. and Olarewaju, A.O (1992) Effects of Instructional Objectives and Hierarchically Organized, Learning Tasks on Students Achievement in Integrated Science. Lagos Journal of Science Education (1), 7-13
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H.Freeman and company.
• Bednar, A., & Levie, W. H. (1993). Attitude-change principles. In M. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences (2nd ed., pp. 283-304). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Bekee, F. (1987) The Effect of Behavioral Objectives and Diagnostic Teaching Strategies on Students’ Achievement in Integrated Science. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis, University of Ibadan.
• Boliner, G., & Wanke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
• Brualdi, A.C. (1998). Classroom questions. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Washington DC. ERIC Identifier: ED42240
• Butty, J.L.M (2001). Teacher instruction, student attitudes, and mathematics performance among 10th and 12th grade black and Hispanic students. Howard University. Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
• Cornell, C (1999) I hate math! I couldn’t learn it, and I can’t teach it! Children Education, 75(4), 225-231.
• Cotton, K (2001). Classroom questioning. The Schooling Practices that matter most. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
• Duchastel, P.C. and Merril, P.F. (1973). The Effect of Behavioral Objectives on Learning: A Review of Empirical Studies. Review of Educational Research 43 (1), 53 – 69.
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
• Farrant,J.S. (1994). Principle and practice of education. Singapore. Longman.
• Fennema, E, Carpenter, T.P, & Peterson,P (1988).Teacher’s decision making and cognitively guided instruction. A new paradigm for curriculum development. In N.F. Ellertor & M.A. Clemments (Eds). School Mathematics: the challenge to change. Greenlong, Vic.:deakin University Press. 174-189.
• Greenwald, A.G. (1989b). Why are attitudes important? In A.R.Pratkanis, S.J.Breckler & A.G.Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude, structure and function (pp1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erilaum Associates.
• Greenwald, A. G. (1989d). Why attitudes are important: Defining attitude and attitude theory 20 years later. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 429-440). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Guat, T.B., & Teh, G. P. L. (1987). The effectiveness of using instructional objectives with less able secondary school pupils. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 135-144. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet3/teo.html
• Hart, L. (1989). Describing the affective domain. Saying what we mean. In McLeod & Adams (Eds.). Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving, 37-45. New York. Springer Verlay.
• Ibegbulam, C.A. (1980) Effects of Orienting Stimuli on the Attitudes and Achievement in Biology of a group of Nigerian Secondary School Pupils. Unpublished Phd. Thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
• Kamradt, T. F., & Kamradt, E. J. (1999). Structured design for attitudinal instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm Of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 563-590). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Leven, T. and Long, R. (1981). Effective instruction. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Mager, R.F (1962) Preparing Instructional Objectives: Palo Alto. California, Fearson Publishers.
• Melton, R.F (1978) Resolution of Conflicting Claims Concerning the Effect of Behavioral Objectives on Student Learning. Review of Educational Research (2), 291 – 302.
• Morgan, N., and Saxton, J. (1991). Teaching, questioning, and learning. New York: Routledge.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.
• Newbill, P. L (2005). Instructional strategies to improve women’s attitudes towards science. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Curriculum and Instruction
• Nzewi, U. (1994) Achievement in, Attitude to and Motivation to Study Biology – The Role of Behavioral Objectives and Study Questions. Journal of Science Movement Education 1, 61 – 67.
• Olowojaiye, F.B. (1999) Attitude of Senior Secondary School Students as it Relates to Achievement in Mathematics. Lagos Journal of Science Education on 4, 51 – 56.
• Olowojaiye, F.B. (2000). A Comparative Analysis of Students Interest in and Perception of Teaching/Learning of Mathematics at Senior Secondary Schools Levels. A Paper Presented at MAN Conference “EKO 2000”.
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-20.
• Stein. M.K., Grover,B.W., & Henninssen N. (1996). Building Student capacity for mathematics thinking and reasoning. An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2) 455-466.
• Stevens, R. (1912). The question as a means of efficiency in instruction: A critical study of classroom practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
• Zan, R., & Martino,P.D.(2007). Attitudes towards mathematics: Overcoming positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiasts Monograph 3, pp157-168. The Montana Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

APA

Akinsola, M. K., & Olowojaiye, F. B. (2008). Teacher Instructional Methods and Student Attitudes towards Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/218

Vancouver

Akinsola MK, Olowojaiye FB. Teacher Instructional Methods and Student Attitudes towards Mathematics. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2008;3(1):60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/218

AMA

Akinsola MK, Olowojaiye FB. Teacher Instructional Methods and Student Attitudes towards Mathematics. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2008;3(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/218

Chicago

Akinsola, M. K., and F. B. Olowojaiye. "Teacher Instructional Methods and Student Attitudes towards Mathematics". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2008 3 no. 1 (2008): 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/218

Harvard

Akinsola, M. K., and Olowojaiye, F. B. (2008). Teacher Instructional Methods and Student Attitudes towards Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), pp. 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/218

MLA

Akinsola, M. K. et al. "Teacher Instructional Methods and Student Attitudes towards Mathematics". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 3, no. 1, 2008, pp. 60-73. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/218