International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Achieve. (2013). Next-generation science standards. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
• Alumbaugh, K. M. (2015). The perceptions of elementary STEM schools in Missouri [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lindenwood University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4997e4df9137ac836635343a8d0adcd0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
• Anaya, L., Stafford, F., & Zamarro, G. (2022). Gender gaps in math performance perceived mathematical ability and college STEM education: The role of parental occupation. Education Economics, 30(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2021.1974344
• Biewen, M., & Schwerter, J. (2022). Does more maths and natural sciences in high school increase the share of female STEM workers? Evidence from a curriculum reform. Applied Economics, 54(16), 1889-1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1983139
• Charlesworth, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Gender in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, causes, solutions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228-7243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019
• Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-method research. SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842
• Drazan, J. F. (2020). Biomechanists can revolutionize the STEM pipeline by engaging youth athletes in sports-science based STEM outreach. Journal of Biomechanics, 99, 109511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109511
• Đurišić, M., & Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as an important factor for successful education. CEPS Journal, 7(3), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.291
• Edzie, R. L. (2014). Exploring the factors that influence and motivate female students to enrol and persist in collegiate STEM degree programs: A mixed-methods study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Nebraska. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEEGCC.2013.6705815
• English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
• Franz-Odendaal, T. A., Blotnicky, K. A., & Joy, P. (2020). Math self-efficacy and the likelihood of pursuing a STEM-based career: A gender-based analysis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(3), 538-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00105-7
• Ghani, F. A., Rasli, M. A. M., & Razali, N. H. A. (2020). Parental role and challenges in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In Proceedings of the 9^th International Economics and Business Management Conference (pp. 879-894). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.05.97
• Gore, J. (2016). Reconciling educational research traditions [Paper presentation]. The Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0245-8
• Han, F. (2019). Self-concept and achievement in math among Australian primary students: Gender and culture issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00603
• Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802309424
• Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But ... Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
• Hendrawijaya, A. T. (2022). Effects of mediation of learning interest in improving student learning achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 857-872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15149a
• Hoferichter, F., & Raufelder, D. (2019). Mothers and fathers–Who matters for STEM performance? Gender-specific associations between STEM performance, parental pressure, and support during adolescence. Frontiers in Education, 4, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00014
• Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2017). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 655-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z
• Hsieh, T. L., & Yu, P. (2022). Exploring achievement motivation, student engagement, and learning outcomes for STEM college students in Taiwan through the lenses of gender differences and multiple pathways. Research in Science & Technological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1983796
• Ing, M. (2014). Can parents influence children’s mathematics achievement and persistence in STEM careers? Journal of Career Development, 41(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845313481672
• Kanematsu, H., & Barry, D. M. (2016). STEM and ICT education in intelligent environments. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19234-5
• Kolo, Y. I. (2016). Experiences of African American young women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education [PhD dissertation, Wladen University]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3105&context=dissertations
• Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards robotics and STEM: Differences based on gender and robotics experience. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 23(2020), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100167
• Let’s Talk Science. (2015). Exploring parental influence: Shaping teen decisions regarding science education. http://www.letstalkscience.ca/Portals/0/Documents/RPS/Spotlight/LTS-Exploring-parental-influence-EN.pdf
• Liebendörfer, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2017). Interest development during the first year at university: Do mathematical beliefs predict interest in mathematics? ZDM, 49, 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0827-3
• Lloyd, A., Gore, J., Holmes, K., Smith, M., & Fray, L. (2018). Parental influences on those seeking a career in STEM: The primacy of gender. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10(2), 308-328. https://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/510
• Maltese, A. V., & Cooper, C. S. (2017). STEM pathways: Do men and women differ in why they enter and exit? AERA Open, 3(3), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417727276
• MECD. (2017). Avance de la estadı’ stica de estudiantes. Curso 2015-2016. Estudios de grado y primer y segundo ciclo [Preview of students’ figures. Course 2015-2016. First and second cycle university studies]. Ministry of Education. https://www.ine.es/prodyser/espa_cifras/2018/16/
• Mills, L. A. (2013). Indicators of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) career interest among middle school students in the USA [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of North Texas. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a0d76368ae6c619c415c0a72232019bbd62bef3f
• Moshfeghyeganeh, S., & Hazari, Z. (2021). Effect of culture on women physicists’ career choice: A comparison of Muslim majority countries and the West. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 010114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010114
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Science.pdf
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying practical approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academy of Sciences. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/13158/successful-k-12-stem-education-identifying-effective-approaches-in-science
• Nite, S. B., Rice, D. C., & Tejani, R. (2020). Influences for engineering majors: Results of a survey from a major research university. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference 2020. https://peer.asee.org/influences-for-engineering-majors-results-of-a-survey-from-a-major-research-university
• Noonan, R. (2017). STEM jobs: 2017 update (ESA issue brief# 02-17). Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Office of the Chief Economist. https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/reports/stem-jobs-2017-update.pdf
• NSB. (2016). Science and engineering indicators. National Science Board. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2016/nsb20161.pdf
• NSF. (2017). Bachelor’s degrees, by sex and field: 2004-14. In women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 (special report NSF 17-310). National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/static/downloads/nsf17310-digest.pdf
• Perera, H. N., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Vocational interest profiles: Profile replicability and relations with the STEM major choice and the big-five. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 84-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.11.012
• Perera, L. D. H. (2014). Parents’ attitudes towards science and their children’s science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3021-3041. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.949900
• Riera, B., Emprin, F., Annebicque, D., Colas, M., & Vigario, B. (2016). HOME I/O: A virtual house for control and STEM education from middle schools to universities. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(6), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.172
• Sahin, A., Ekmekci, A., & Waxman, H. (2017). Characteristics of students who majored in STEM fields. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1549-1572. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1341067
• Sahin, A., Ekmekci, A., & Waxman, H. (2018). Collective effects of individual, behavioral, and contextual factors on high school students’ future STEM career plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9847-x
• Sahin, A., Waxman, H. C., Demirci, E., & Rangel, V. S. (2019). An investigation of Harmony Public School students college enrollment and STEM major selection rates and perceptions of factors in STEM major selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1249-1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10017-0
• Sáinz, M., Fàbregues, S., Rodó-de-Zárate, M., Martínez-Cantos, J. L., Arroyo, L., & Romano, M. J. (2020). Gendered motivations to pursue male-dominated STEM Careers among Spanish young people: A qualitative study. Journal of Career Development, 47(4), 408-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318801101
• Shin, S., Rachmatullah, A., Roshayanti, F., Ha, M., & Lee, J. K. (2018). Career motivation of secondary students in STEM: A cross-cultural study between Korea and Indonesia. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 18(2), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-017-9355-0
• Šimunović, M., Reić Ercegovac, I., & Burušić, J. (2018). How important is it to my parents? Transmission of STEM academic values: The role of parents’ values and practices and children’s perceptions of parental influences. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 977-995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460696
• Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The effects of a discovery learning module on geometry for improving students’ mathematical reasoning skills, communication, and self-confidence. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.12
• Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Marsigit. (2022). Desain pembelajaran science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) dilengkapi dengan contoh soal [Science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) learning design is equipped with examples of questions]. KMB Indonesia. https://penerbithaura.com/product/desain-pembelajaran-science-technology-engineering-dan-mathematics-stem-dilengkapi-dengan-contoh-soal/
• Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2019). The effect of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) program on students’ achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885
• Steegh, A. M., Hoffler, T. N., Keller, M. M., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Gender differences in mathematics and science competitions: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1431-1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21580
• Svoboda, R. C., Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Harackiewicz, J. M., & Destin, M. (2016). Understanding the relationship between parental education and STEM course taking through identity-based and expectancy-value theories of motivation. AERA Open, 2(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416664875
• Ugwuanyi, C. S., & Okeke, C. I. (2020). Determinants of university students’ interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education in Nigeria: A case of a structural equation modelling. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, 10(3), 6209-6218. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdjun2020590
• Urban, M. J., & Favlo, D. A. (2016). Improving K-12 STEM education outcomes through technological integration. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9616-7
• van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. W. (2016). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: An overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9308-1
• Voyer, D., Voyer, S.D. & Saint-Aubin, J. (2017). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 307-334. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7
• Wolfe, M. J. (2019). Smart girls traversing assemblages of gender and class in Australian secondary mathematics classrooms. Gender and Education, 31(2), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1302078
• Yoder, B. L., (2017). Engineering by the numbers. In 2017 ASEE profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges (pp. 13-49). ASEE. https://tauruspet.med.yale.edu/staff/edm42/courses/ENAS_508_2019/Sessions/Session_2_Women_Panel/Engineering_by_the_Numbers.pdf

APA

Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Nite, S. (2023). Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060

Vancouver

Siregar NC, Rosli R, Nite S. Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(2):em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060

AMA

Siregar NC, Rosli R, Nite S. Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(2), em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060

Chicago

Siregar, Nur Choiro, Roslinda Rosli, and Sandra Nite. "Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2023 18 no. 2 (2023): em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060

Harvard

Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., and Nite, S. (2023). Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060

MLA

Siregar, Nur Choiro et al. "Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060