International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
• Amador, J. M., & Weston, T. L. (2024). A review of analytic frameworks for noticing in mathematics and science: Comparing noticing frameworks across disciplines and over time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22, 1739-1760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10452-8
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 223(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
• Buschang, R. E., Chung, G. K. W. K., Delacruz, G. C., & Baker, E. L. (2012). Validating measures of algebra teacher subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, & Student Testing, UCLA. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2012.697847
• Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Contreras, L. C., & Muñoz-Catalán, M. D. C. (2013). Determining specialised knowledge for mathematics teaching. In Proceedings of the CERME (vol. 8, pp. 2985-2994).
• Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L. C., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar-Gonzales, A., Ribeiro, M., & Muñoz-Catalán, M. C. (2018). The mathematics teachers specialised knowledge (MTSK) model. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981
• Charalambous, C. Y. (2016). Investigating the knowledge needed for teaching mathematics: An exploratory validation study focusing on teaching practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(3), 220-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116634168
• Charalambous, C. Y., Hill, H. C., Chin, M. J., & McGinn, D. (2020). Mathematical content knowledge and knowledge for teaching: Exploring their distinguishability and contribution to student learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(6), 579-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09443-2
• Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., & Sunbury, S. (2020). The impact of high school life science teachers’ subject matter knowledge and knowledge of student misconceptions on students’ learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
• de Almeida, M. V. R., Ribeiro, M., & Fiorentini, D. (2021). Mathematical specialized knowledge of a mathematics teacher educator for teaching divisibility. Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática, 15(3), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v15i3.15778
• Delaney, S. (2012). A validation study of the use of mathematical knowledge for teaching measures in Ireland. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0382-5
• Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Janssen, R., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.009
• Ekmekci, A., & Serrano, D. M. (2022). The impact of teacher quality on student motivation, achievement, and persistence in science and mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(10), Article 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100649
• Fram, S. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1569
• Gaona, J., G. Miranda, D., Vergara, A., Ramírez, P., & Menares, R. (2024). Evaluation of didactic disciplinary standards of preservice mathematics teachers in Chile: Building an indebted teaching staff? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.7997
• Giaconi, V., Gómez, G., Jiménez, D., Gareca, B., Durán del Fierro, F., & Varas, M. (2022). Evaluación diagnóstica inicial en la formación inicial docente en Chile y su relación con contextos institucionales [Initial diagnostic assessment in initial teacher training in Chile and its relationship with institutional contexts]. Pensamiento Educativo, 59(1), Article 00104. https://doi.org/10.7764/pel.59.1.2022.4
• Godino, J. D. (2009). Categorías de análisis de los conocimientos del profesor de matemáticas [Categories of analysis of the knowledge of the mathematics teacher]. UNIÓN-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, 5(20). https://union.fespm.es/index.php/UNION/article/view/1063
• Godoy, T. C. G., Reyes-Santander, P., & Ayarza, R. O. (2021). Mathematical knowledge and overall practice in initial teacher education of early childhood teachers. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782021260061
• Gutiérrez, A. G., Gómez, P., & Rico, L. (2016). Conocimiento matemático sobre números y operaciones de los estudiantes de magisterio [Mathematical knowledge of numbers and operations of teaching students]. Educación XX1, 19(1), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.15581
• Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. L. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. In D. Matsumoto, & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 46-74). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779381.004
• Harvard University. (n. d.). Measures of effective teaching: Refreshing the framework. Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University. https://cepr.harvard.edu/mkt-measures-refresh
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
• Hiebert, J., Berk, D., Miller, E., Gallivan, H., & Meikle, E. (2019). Relationships between opportunity to learn mathematics in teacher preparation and graduates’ knowledge for teaching mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(1), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.1.0023
• Hill, H. C. (2010). The nature and predictors of elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 513-545. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.5.0513
• Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jan, D., Riaz, A., & Yaseen, M. (2023). The impact of pedagogical knowledge and teaching practices of teachers on students’ achievement in public schools of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 5(2), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v5i02.1098
• König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., née Nehls, C. F., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0
• Krauss, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and con- tent knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(5), 873-892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0141-9
• Lo, W. Y. (2020). Examining the mathematical content knowledge of pre-service primary teachers at the highest primary school level in Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 24(3), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1758760
• Louie, N., & Zhan, W. (2022). A socio-ecological framework for research in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(5), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2022-0003
• Mello Román, J. D., & Hernández Estrada, A. (2019). Un estudio sobre el rendimiento académico en matemáticas [A study on academic performance in mathematics]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 21. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2019.21.e29.2090
• MINEDUC. (2014). INICIA 2014 assessment report: Diagnosis of graduates from primary and secondary education teaching programs. Ministerio de Educación de Chile. https://www.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2015/11/Presentaci%C3%B3n-Resultados-INICIA-2014.pdf
• MINEDUC. (2021). Estándares orientadores para la formación inicial docente [Guiding standards for initial teacher training]. Ministerio de Educación de Chile. https://www.cpeip.cl/estandares-formacion-docente/
• Muhtarom, M., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. (2019). Examining prospective teachers’ belief and pedagogical content knowledge towards teaching practice in mathematics class: A case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7326.185-202
• Novick, M. R., & Lewis, C. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289400
• Parra-Fica, J., Samuel, M., & Díaz-Levicoy, D. (2020). Design of self-instruction textbooks on number and operations by preservice elementary school teachers: A preliminary Study. Acta Scientiae, 22(2), 2-28. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5536
• Phelps, G., Howell, H., & Liu, S. (2020). Exploring differences in mathematical knowledge for teaching for prospective and practicing teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(2), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01097-x
• Pincheira, N., Alsina, Á., & Acosta, Y. (2023). Preservice teachers designing mathematical tasks on patterns: Context, cognitive demand, and skills. Uniciencia, 37(1), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.37-1.2
• Ribeiro, M., Policastro, M., Caldatto, M., & Almeida, A. (2022). Interpretative knowledge of prospective kindergarten and primary teachers in the context of subtraction. Acta Scientiae, 24(3), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6767
• Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5
• Ruz, F., Ubilla, F. M., & Giaconi, V. (2023). Characterising the didactic-stochastic knowledge of future mathematics teachers: The case of Chile. Acta Scientiae, 25(4), 95-132. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7698
• Saadati, F., Larrain, M., Bastian, A., Felmer, P., & Kaiser, G. (2024). Adapting german instruments and validating their use to measure chilean mathematics teachers’ professional competence. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(4), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2322494
• Santagata, R., & Lee, J. (2021). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: A study of novice elementary school teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09447-y
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
• Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In S. Llinares, & O. Chapman (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Volume 2 (pp. 321-354). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087905460_016
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
• Sosa, L., & Carrillo-Yañez, J. (2010). Caracterización del conocimiento matemático para la enseñanza (MKT) de matrices en bachillerato [Characterization of mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) of matrices in high school]. In M. M. Moreno, A. Estrada, J. Carrillo, & T. A. Sierra (Eds.), Investigación en educación matemática XIV (pp. 569-580). SEIEM.
• Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundada [Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundada] (1. ed.). Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
• Tabachnick, B. G. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
• Tatto, M. T., Peck, R., Schwille, J., Bankov, K., Senk, S. L., Rodriguez, M., Ingvarson, L., Reckase, M., & Rowley, G. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: Findings from the IEA teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-MM). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
• Van Steenbrugge, H., Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Preservice elementary school teachers’ knowledge of fractions: A mirror of students’ knowledge? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.839003
• Verdugo Peñaloza, A., Tejada Fernández, J., & Navío Gámez, A. (2021). Valoración de la formación de los estándares pedagógicos según estudiantes de pedagogía [Assessment of the formation of pedagogical standards according to pedagogy students]. Perfiles Educativos, 43(171), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2021.171.59216
• Warrah, S. M., Musa, A. F., & Ibrahim, A. O. (2020). Determine the relationship between teacher knowledge and students’ academic performance using teacher commitment as mediator. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v1i5.25
• Zakaryan, D., & Ribeiro, M. (2016). Conocimiento de la enseñanza de números racionales: Una ejemplificación de relaciones [Knowledge of teaching rational numbers: An exemplification of relationships]. Zetetiké, 24(3), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v24i3.8648095

APA

Chandía, E., Fuentes Acevedo, P., Ruiz, N., Rojas, D., Baeza, M., & Reyes, C. (2025). Knowledge profiles on numbers for teaching by primary education pedagogy students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(3), em0828. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16080

Vancouver

Chandía E, Fuentes Acevedo P, Ruiz N, Rojas D, Baeza M, Reyes C. Knowledge profiles on numbers for teaching by primary education pedagogy students. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(3):em0828. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16080

AMA

Chandía E, Fuentes Acevedo P, Ruiz N, Rojas D, Baeza M, Reyes C. Knowledge profiles on numbers for teaching by primary education pedagogy students. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(3), em0828. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16080

Chicago

Chandía, Eugenio, Patricia Fuentes Acevedo, Natalia Ruiz, Daniza Rojas, Mirian Baeza, and Cristian Reyes. "Knowledge profiles on numbers for teaching by primary education pedagogy students". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2025 20 no. 3 (2025): em0828. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16080

Harvard

Chandía, E., Fuentes Acevedo, P., Ruiz, N., Rojas, D., Baeza, M., and Reyes, C. (2025). Knowledge profiles on numbers for teaching by primary education pedagogy students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(3), em0828. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16080

MLA

Chandía, Eugenio et al. "Knowledge profiles on numbers for teaching by primary education pedagogy students". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 3, 2025, em0828. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16080