International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Barikeri, S., Lauscher, A., Vulić, I., & Glavaš, G. (2021). RedditBias: A real-world resource for bias evaluation and debiasing of conversational language models. In C. Zong, F. Xia, W. Li, & R. Navigli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 59^th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11^th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 1941-1955). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.151
• Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2018). Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00041
• Borji, A. (2023). A categorical archive of chatgpt failures. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03494
• Chen, L., Zaharia, M., & Zou, J. (2023). How is ChatGPT’s behavior changing over time? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.09009
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
• Davis, E. (2024). Mathematics, word problems, common sense, and artificial intelligence. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 61(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1828
• Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
• Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., , Griffiths, R.R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical capabilities of ChatGPT. In A. Oh, T. Neumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, & S. Levine (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 36 (pp. 27699-27744). Curran Associates, Inc.
• Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005
• Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(4), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001
• Hintze, J. L., & Nelson, R. D. (1998). Violin plots: A box plot-density trace synergism. The American Statistician, 52(2), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685478
• Hofer, S. I., Nistor, N., & Scheibenzuber, C. (2021). Online teaching and learning in higher education: Lessons learned in crisis situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, Article 106789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789
• Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
• Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S., Santos, O., Rodrigo, M., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I., & Koedinger, K. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 504-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
• Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., …, & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
• Katz, D. M., Bommarito, M. J., Gao, S., & Arredondo, P. (2024). GPT-4 passes the bar exam. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 382(2270), Article 20230254. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0254
• Korkmaz Guler, N., Dertli, Z. G., Boran, E., & Yildiz, B. (2024). An artificial intelligence application in mathematics education: Evaluating ChatGPT’s academic achievement in a mathematics exam. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), Article em0188. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14145
• Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of chatgpt on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
• Lu, P., Qiu, L., Yu, W., Welleck, S., & Chang, K. W. (2022). A survey of deep learning for mathematical reasoning. In A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, & N. Okazaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 61^st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 14605-14631). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.817
• Matzakos, N., Doukakis, S., & Moundridou, M. (2023). Learning mathematics with large language models: A comparative study with computer algebra systems and other tools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(20), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i20.42979
• McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House Publishing.
• Mohamed, M. Z. B., Hidayat, R., Suhaizi, N. N. B., Sabri, N. B. M., Mahmud, M. K. H. B., & Baharuddin, S. N. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), Article em0694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12132
• OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
• Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., Schulman, J., Hilton, J., Kelton, F., Miller, L., Simens, M., Askell, A., Welinder, P., Christiano, P., Leike, J., & Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, & A. Oh (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 35 (pp. 27730-27744). Curran Associates, Inc.
• Plevris, V., Papazafeiropoulos, G., & Jiménez Rios, A. (2023). Chatbots put to the test in math and logic problems: A comparison and assessment of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard. AI, 4(4), 949-969. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4040048
• Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T.,Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. OpenAI. https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf
• Shahriar, S., & Hayawi, K. (2023). Let’s have a chat! A conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, applications, and limitations. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA3202939
• Udias, A., Alonso-Ayuso, A., Sanchez, I., Hernandez, S., Castellanos, M. E., Diez, R. M., & Cano, E. L. (2023). The potential of large language models for improving probability learning: A study on ChatGPT3.5 and first-year computer engineering students. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.05686
• Ugarte, M. D., Militino, A. F., & Arhholt A. T. (2015). Probability and statistics with R (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18682
• Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A., Kaiser, u., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, & R. Garnett (Eds.) Advances in neural information processing systems 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
• Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), Article em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
• Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet? A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
• Xuan-Quy, D., Ngoc-Bich, L., The-Duy, V., Xuan-Dung, P., Bac-Bien, N., Van-Tien, N., Thi-My-Thanh, N., & Hong-Phuoc, N. (2023). VNHSGE: VietNamese high school graduation examination dataset for large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.12199
• Zhang, C. E., Collins, K. M., Weller, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2023). AI for mathematics: A cognitive science perspective. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13021

APA

Udias, A., Alonso-Ayuso, A., Alfaro, C., Algar, M. J., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Isabel, A., Gómez, J., Lancho, C., Cano, E. L., Martín de Diego, I., & Ortega, F. (2024). ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(4), em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517

Vancouver

Udias A, Alonso-Ayuso A, Alfaro C, Algar MJ, Cuesta M, Fernández-Isabel A, et al. ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2024;19(4):em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517

AMA

Udias A, Alonso-Ayuso A, Alfaro C, et al. ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2024;19(4), em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517

Chicago

Udias, Angel, Antonio Alonso-Ayuso, César Alfaro, María Jesús Algar, Marina Cuesta, Alberto Fernández-Isabel, Javier Gómez, Carmen Lancho, Emilio L. Cano, Isaac Martín de Diego, and Felipe Ortega. "ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2024 19 no. 4 (2024): em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517

Harvard

Udias, A., Alonso-Ayuso, A., Alfaro, C., Algar, M. J., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Isabel, A., . . . Ortega, F. (2024). ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(4), em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517

MLA

Udias, Angel et al. "ChatGPT’s performance in university admissions tests in mathematics". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 19, no. 4, 2024, em0795. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15517