International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Bossé, M. J. (2014). Processes and Reasoning in Representations of Linear Functions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9416-x
• Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Chandler, K. (2017). Student Connections between Algebraic and Graphical Polynomial Representations in the Context of a Polynomial Relation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 915–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9730-1
• Ainsworth, S. (1999). The Functions of Multiple Representations. Computers and Education, 33(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
• Bal, P. A. (2015). Skills of Using and Transform Multiple Representations of the Prospective Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 582–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.197
• Barmby, P., Harries, T., Higgins, S., & Suggate, J. (2007). How Can We Assess Mathematical Understanding? Proceedings of the 31^st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 41–48.
• Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and Understanding Line Graph Interpretations Using a Scoring Rubric of Organized Cited Factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9318-8
• Chick, H. (1998). Cognition in the Formal Modes: Research Mathematics and the SOLO Taxonomy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(2), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217340
• Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the Reluctance to Visualize in Mathematics. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Washington, DC: MAA. 127–138.
• Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Mousoulides, N. (2006). Are Registers of Representations and Problem Solving Processes on Functions Compartmentalized in Students’ Thinking? Relime Número Espec, 9, 197–224.
• Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational Systems, Learning, and Problem Solving in Mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviors, 17(2), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80056-1
• Greer, B. (2009). Representational Flexibility and Mathematical Expertise. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41(5), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0211-7
• Jao, L. (2013). From Sailing Ship to Subtraction Symbols : Multiple Representations to Support Abstraction. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 33, 49–64.
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2011). Using SOLO Taxonomy to Explore Students’ Mental Models of the Programming Variable and the Assignment Statement. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 4(2), 54-74.
• Knuth, E. J. (2000). Student Understanding of the Cartesian Connection: An Exploratory Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 500-5008. https://doi.org/10.2307/749655
• Mhlolo, M. K., Venkat, H., & Schäfer, M. (2012). The Nature and Quality of the Mathematical Connections Teachers Make. Journal of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, 33(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/doi:10.4102/pythagoras.v33i1.22
• Rahmawati, D., Purwanto, Subanji, Hidayanto, E., & Anwar, R. B. (2017). Process of Mathematical Representation Translation from Verbal into Graphic. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 367-381.
• Warner, L. B., Schorr, R. Y., & Davis, G. E. (2009). Flexible Use of symbolic Tools for problem Solving, Generalization, and Explanation. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41(5), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0190-8

APA

Afriyani, D., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Muksar, M. (2018). Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

Vancouver

Afriyani D, Sa’dijah C, Subanji S, Muksar M. Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2018;13(3):281-7. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

AMA

Afriyani D, Sa’dijah C, Subanji S, Muksar M. Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2018;13(3), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

Chicago

Afriyani, Dona, Cholis Sa’dijah, Subanji Subanji, and Makbul Muksar. "Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2018 13 no. 3 (2018): 281-287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

Harvard

Afriyani, D., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., and Muksar, M. (2018). Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), pp. 281-287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

MLA

Afriyani, Dona et al. "Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task based on Solo Taxonomy". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2018, pp. 281-287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920