International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Aydemir, D., & Cakıroglu, E. (2013). Üstün yetenekli ilköğretim öğrencilerinin matematik derslerine ilişkin algıları [Perceptions of gifted primary school students about mathematics lessons]. Proceedings of the 12^th MATDER Semposium (pp. 266-268), Ankara, Turkey.
• Best, K., Jones‐Katz, L., Smolarek, B., Stolzenburg, M., & Williamson, D. (2015). Listening to our students: An exploratory practice study of ESL writing students’ views of feedback. Tesol Journal, 6(2), 332-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.152
• Campbell, J. R., Cho, S., & Feng, A. X. (2010). Academic competition. A bridge to more opportunities for the talented. Roeper Review, 33(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530201
• Chamberlin, M. T., & Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). Enhancing preservice teacher development: Field experiences with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 381-416. https://doi:10.1177/016235321003300305
• Chamberlin, S. A. (2002). Analysis of interest during and after model eliciting activities: A comparison of gifted and general population students [PhD Thesis, Purdue University].
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). SAGE.
• Danaher, M. (1994). Summary report of a study investigating issues of concern to the effective teaching of listening skills to beginning students of Japanese as a Foreign Language (JFL). Queensland Researcher, 10, 17-25.
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320102500102
• Freiman, V. (2006). Problems to discover and to boost mathematical talent in early grades: A challenging situations approach. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 3(1), 51-75. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol3/iss1/3
• Fullan, M. G., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school. The Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast & Islands, Andover. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED342128.pdf
• Gagné, F. 2005. From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.008
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., Sheffield, L. J., & Spinelli, A. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds-A research-based curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(1), 566-585. https://doi.org/0.4219/jaa-2007-552
• Hammer, E. J. (2002). Changes in math attitudes of mathematically gifted students taught in regular classroom settings from fourth to seventh grade. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 1708. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5287650
• Ignacio, N. G., Nieto, L. J. B., & Barona, E. G., (2006). The affective domain in mathematics learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 1(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/169 https://www.iejme.com/article/the-affective-domain-in-mathematics-learning
• Kalman, R. (2002). Challenging gifted students: The Math Olympiads. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(4), 13-14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ653804
• Karaduman, G. B. (2010). Üstün yetenekli öğrenciler için uygulanan farklılaştırılmış matematik eğitim programları [Differentiated mathematics education programs for gifted students]. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education], 13(1), 1-12.
• Kenderov, P. S. (2006, August). Competitions and mathematics education. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (pp. 1583-1598), Madrid, Spain. https://doi.org/10.4171/022-3/76
• Kogce, D., Yıldız, C., Aydın, M., & Altındağ, R. (2009). Examining elementary school students’ attitudes towards mathematics in terms of some variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.053
• Leikin, R. (2010). Teaching the mathematically gifted. Gifted Education International, 27(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941002700206
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289, 331.
• Manev, K., Kelevedjiev, E., & Kapralov, S. (2007). Programming contests for school students in Bulgaria. Olympiads in Informatics, 1, 112-123. https://ioinformatics.org/journal/INFOL010.pdf
• McComas, K. K. (2011). Mathematically gifted students’ experiences of challenge with cognitively guided instruction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas].
• McLoughlin, J. G. (2003). The role of mathematics contests. Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 111-115.
• Michaels, L. A., & Forsyth, R. A. (1977). Construction and validation of an instrument measuring certain attitudes toward mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(4), 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700429
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expande sourcebook (2nd Ed.). SAGE.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1998). NCTM’s statem ent of belief. https://www.nctm.org/
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S. (2004). The role of participation in in-school and outside-of-school activities in the talent development of gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-454
• Ozdemir, D., & Isiksal Bostan, M. (2021). A design based study: Characteristics of differentiated tasks for mathematically gifted students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 125-144.
• Reger, B. H. (2006). How does participation in inquiry-based activities influence gifted students’ higher order thinking? [PhD Thesis, Purdue University].
• Riley, T. L., & Karnes, F. A. (1998). Mathematics + competitions = A winning formula! Gifted Child Today Magazine, 21(4), 42-48. https://doi.org/0.1177/107621759802100413
• Rudnick, J. (2014). Success by numbers: Canada math competitions help prepare students for challenges ahead. Gazette-Ontario Association for Mathematics, 53(1), 22.
• Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315
• Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. Prufrock Journal, 14(3), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2003-425
• Steegh, A. M., Höffler, T. N., Keller, M. M., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Gender differences in mathematics and science competitions: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1431-1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21580
• Stockton, J. C. (2012). Mathematical competitions in Hungary: Promoting a tradition of excellence & creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 9(1), 37-58.
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE.
• Subotnik, R. F., Miserandino, A. D., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1996). Implications of the Olympiad studies for the development of mathematical talent in schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(6), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S08830355(97)86733-X
• Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(1), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022171531285
• Thrasher, T. N. (2008). The benefits of mathematics competitions. Alabama Journal of Mathematics, 33, 59-63. http://ajmonline.org/2008/12.pdf
• Verhoeff, T. (1997). The role of competitions in education. Future World: Educating for the 21st Century, 1-10.
• Wahl, M., & Besag, F. (1986). Gender, attribution, and math performance [Paper presentation]. 67th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, USA.
• Wakefield, D. V. (2000). Math as a second language. The Educational Forum, 64(3), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720008984764
• Weis, L., & Fine, M. (Eds.) (1993). Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools. State University of New York Press.
• Yevdokimov, O. (2007). Using the history of mathematics for mentoring gifted students: Notes for teachers. Proceedings of the 21st Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (pp. 267-275), Hobart, Tasmania.

APA

Ozdemir, D. (2022). An Examination of Students’ Views about an International Math Contest. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11817

Vancouver

Ozdemir D. An Examination of Students’ Views about an International Math Contest. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2022;17(2):em0680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11817

AMA

Ozdemir D. An Examination of Students’ Views about an International Math Contest. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2022;17(2), em0680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11817

Chicago

Ozdemir, Duygu. "An Examination of Students’ Views about an International Math Contest". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2022 17 no. 2 (2022): em0680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11817

Harvard

Ozdemir, D. (2022). An Examination of Students’ Views about an International Math Contest. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11817

MLA

Ozdemir, Duygu "An Examination of Students’ Views about an International Math Contest". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 17, no. 2, 2022, em0680. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11817