International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item developemt. In S. M. Downing, & T. M. Haladyna (Ed.), Handbook of test development (pp. 377-398). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Abedi, J., & Gándara, P. (2006). Performance of english language learners as a subgroup in large-scale assessment: Interaction of research and policy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00077.x
• Abedi, J., & Herman, J. (2010). Assessing english language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: Issues and limitations. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 723-746. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200301
• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2
• Abedi, J., Leon, S., Wolf, M. K., & Farnsworth, T. (2008). Detecting test items differentially impacting the performance of ell students. In M. K. Wolf, J. L. Herman, J. Kim, J. Abedi, S. Leon, N. Griffin, & P. L. Bachman (Eds.), Providing validity evidence to improve the assessment of English language learners (pp. 55-81). National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
• Abedi, J., Zhang, Y., Rowe, S. E., & Lee, H. (2020). Examining effectiveness and validity of accommodations for English language learners in mathematics: An evidence-based computer accommodation decision system. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(4), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12328
• Abidi, S. M. R., Hussain, M., Xu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2018). Prediction of confusion attempting algebra homework in an intelligent tutoring system through machine learning techniques for educational sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010105
• Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00061-7
• Alexopoulou, T., Michel, M., Murakami, A., & Meurers, D. (2017). Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning, 67(S1), 180-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12232
• Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Rangwala, H. (2018). Needle in a haystack: Identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 118, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.002
• Amir, O., Gal, K., Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., & Belford, R. (2014). Plan recognition and visualization in exploratory learning environments. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 524(212), 289-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02738-8_11
• Balyan, R., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). Applying natural language processing and hierarchical machine learning approaches to text difficulty classification. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(3), 337-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00201-7
• Bednorz, D. (2021). Sprachliche Variationen von mathematischen Textaufgaben. Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Textanpassung für Textaufgaben im Mathematikunterricht [Linguistic variations of mathematical text tasks. Development of a text adaptation tool for text tasks in mathematics education]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33003-3
• Biber, D. (1985). Investigaging macroscopic textual variation through multifeature/multidimensional analyses. Linguistics, 23, 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.2.337
• Biber, D. (2006). Dimensions of register variation. A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge University Press.
• Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136
• Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013a). Identifying multi-dimensional patterns of variation across registers. In M. Krug, & J. Schlüter (Eds.), Research methods in language variation and change (pp. 402-420). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.026
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013b). Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. In B. Aarts, J. Close, G. Leech, & S. Wallis (Eds.), The verb phrase in English. Investigating recent language change with corpora (pp. 99-132). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.006
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic english. Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776
• Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002048
• Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics. Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489
• Biber, D., Egbert, J., Gray, B., Oppliger, R., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2016). Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In M. Kytö, & P. Patha (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics (pp. 351-375). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600231.022
• Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word problem solving in contemporary math education: A plea for reading comprehension skills training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(February), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191
• Boonen, A. J. H., van der Schoot, M., van Wesel, F., de Vries, M. H., & Jolles, J. (2013). What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.05.001
• Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
• Conati, C., & Merten, C. (2007). Eye-tracking for user modeling in exploratory learning environments: An empirical evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(6), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2007.04.010
• Conrad, S. (2015). Register variation. In D. Biber, & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 309-329). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.018
• Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90011-4
• Cummins, J. (2017). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. V Street, & S. May (Eds.), Literacies and language education (pp. 59-72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_6
• Daroczy, G., Meurers, D., Heller, J., Wolska, M., & Nürk, H. C. (2020). The interaction of linguistic and arithmetic factors affects adult performance on arithmetic word problems. Cognitive Processing, 21(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00948-5
• Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
• Dittmar, M., Schmellentin, C., Gilg, E., Dittmar, M., Schmellentin, C., & Gilg, E. (2017). Kohärenzaufbau aus Text-Bild-Gefügen : Wissenserwerb mit schulischen Fachtexten [Building coherence from text-image structures: Acquiring knowledge with specialist school texts]. Leseforum.ch. https://www.forumlettura.ch/sysModules/obxLeseforum/Artikel/579/2017_1_Dittmar_et%20al.pdf
• Ellis, R. (2020). Teacher-preparation for task-based language teaching. In C. Lambert, & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp. 99-120). Multilingual Matters.
• Gentleman, R., & Carey, V. J. (2008). Unsupervised machine learning. In W. Huber, D. Scholtens, F. Hahne, & A. von Heydebreck (Eds.), Bioconductor case studies (pp. 137-157). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77240-0_7
• Gobert, J. D., & Sao Pedro, M. A. (2016). Digital assessment environments for scientific inquiry practices. In A. A. Rupp, & J. P. Leighton (Eds.), The handbook of cognition and assessment: Frameworks, methodologies, and applications (pp. 508-534). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118956588.ch21
• Gogolin, I., & Lange, I. (2011). Bildungssprache und Durchgängige Sprachbildung [Academic language and end-to-end language education]. In S. Fürstenau, & M. Gomolla (Eds.), Migration und schulischer Wandel: Mehrsprachigkeit [Migration and school change: Multilingualism] (pp. 107-127). VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92659-9_6
• Haag, N., Heppt, B., Stanat, P., & Kuhl, P. (2013). Second language learners`performance in mathematics: Disentangling the effects of academic language features. Learning and Instruction, 28, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.001
• Haag, N., Roppelt, A., & Heppt, B. (2015). Effects of mathematics items’ language demands for language minority students: Do they differ between grades? Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.010
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). On the language of physical science. In M. A. K. Halliday, & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 43-51). Routledge.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. Continuum.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2005). Computational and quantitative studies. Continuum.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). The notion of context in language education. In J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education. The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday (pp. 269-290). Continuum.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
• Heine, L., Domenech, M., Otto, L., Neumann, A., Krelle, M., Leiss, D., Höttecke, D., Ehmke, T., & Schwippert, K. (2018). Modellierung sprachlicher Anforderungen in Testaufgaben verschiedener Unterrichtsfächer: Theoretische und empirische Grundlagen [Modeling linguistic requirements in test items of different subjects: Theoretical and empirical foundations]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik [Journal of Applied Linguistics], 69, 69-96. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2018-0017
• Heppt, B., Böhme, K., & Stanat, P. (2014). The role of academic-language features for reading comprehension of language-minority students and students from low-ses families. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.83
• Heppt, B., Volodina, A., Eglinsky, J., Stanat, P., & Weinert, S. (2020). Faktorielle und kriteriale Validität von BiSpra 2-4 [Factorial and critical validity of BiSpra 2-4]. Diagnostica [Diagnostics], 67(2), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000259
• Hofstetter, C. (2003). Contextual and mathematics accommodation test effects for English-language learners. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1602_4
• Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-ai complementarity. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.3
• Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for english language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168-1201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332490
• Kiplinger, V. L., Haug, C. A, & Abedi, J. (2000). Measuring math–not reading–on a math assessment: A language accommodations study of english language learners and other special populations. In Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
• Klix, F. (1995). Stabilität und Wandlungen in geistigen Dispositionen des Menschen [Stability and transformations in human mental dispositions]. In Proceedings of the Leibniz-Sozietät (pp. 5-40).
• Lambert, C. (2020). Frameworks for using tasks in second language instruction. In C. Lambert, & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp. 13-30). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/LAMBER9448
• Lambert, C., & Oliver, R. (2020). Introduction: Tasks in context. In C. Lambert, & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp. 1-10). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069422ar
• Leiss, D., Domenech, M., Ehmke, T., & Schwippert, K. (2017). Schwer–schwierig–diffizil: Zum Einfluss sprachlicher Komplexität von Aufgaben auf fachliche Leistungen in der Sekundarstufe I [Challenging–difficult–hard: On the influence of linguistic complexity of tasks on subject-related performance in lower secondary education]. In D. Leiss, M. Hagena, A. Neumann, & K. Schwippert (Eds.), Mathematik und Sprache. Empirischer Forschungsstand und unterrichtliche Herausforderungen [Mathematics and language. Empirical state of research and teaching challenges] (pp. 99-125). Waxmann.
• Lemke, J. L. (2012). Technical discourse and technocratic ideology. In M. A. K. Halliday, J. Gibbons, & H. Nicholas (Eds.), Learning, keeping, and using language (pp. 435-460). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.lkul2.31lem
• Lin, F.-R., Hsieh, L.-S., & Chuang, F.-T. (2009). Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining. Computers & Education, 52(2), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.005
• Lukin, A., Moore, A., Herke, M., Wegener, R., & Wu, C. (2011). Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4, 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v4i2.187
• Maier, H., & Schweiger, F. (1999). Mathematik und Sprache. Zum Verstehen und Verwenden von Fachsprache im Mathematikunterricht [Mathematics and language. On the understanding and use of technical language in mathematics teaching]. obv und hpt.
• Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of english-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333-368. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.2.70783570r1111t32
• Martiniello, M. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14(3-4), 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903422906
• McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0024
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 229-257.
• Michalke, M. (2018). Package korpus. https://reaktanz.de/?c=hacking&s=koRpus
• Morek, M., & Heller, V. (2012). Bildungssprache–Kommunikative, epistemische, soziale und interaktive Aspekte ihres Gebrauchs [Academic language–communicative, epistemic, social, and interactive aspects of its use]. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik [Journal of Applied Linguistics], 57(1), 67-101. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2012-0011
• Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., R. Niakan Kalhori, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2021). Intelligent tutoring systems: A systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1558257
• Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., & Vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475-1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12036
• Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods and Research, 49(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
• Nelson, L. K., Burk, D., Knudsen, M., & McCall, L. (2018). The future of coding: A comparison of hand-coding and three types of computer-assisted text analysis methods. Sociological Methods and Research, 50(1), 202-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769114
• Newton, J., Le, T., & Bui, D. (2020). Low-proficiency learners and task-based language teaching. In C. Lambert, & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp. 33-48).
• Ortmann, K., & Dipper, S. (2019). Variation between different discourse types: Literate vs. oral. In Proceedings of the NAACL-Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (pp. 64-79). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-1407
• Plath, J., & Leiss, D. (2018). The impact of linguistic complexity on the solution of mathematical modelling tasks. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 50, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0897-x
• Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9
• Prediger, S., Erath, K., & Opitz, E. M. (2019). The language dimension of mathematical difficulties. In A. Fritz, V. Geraldi Haase, & P. Päsänen (Eds.), International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 437-455). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_27
• Reid, T. B. W. (1956). Linguistics, structuralism, and philology. Archivum Linguisticum.
• Revelle, W. (2021). Procedures for personality and psychological research. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
• Revelle, W., & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure: An alternative procedeure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(4), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2
• Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Krist, C. (2021). Combining machine learning and qualitative methods to elaborate students’ ideas about the generality of their model-based explanations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09862-4
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). The challanges of academic language in school subjects. In I. Lindberg, & K. Sandwall (Eds.), Spraket och kunskappen–att lara pa sitt andrasprak i skola och hogskola [Language and knowledge–learning in your second language at school and university] (pp. 47-70). The Institute for Swedish as a Second Language.
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2006). The linguistic features of advanced language use: The grammar of exposition. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning. The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 134-146). Continuum.
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning. The Elementary School Journal, 112(3), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1086/663297
• Schleppegrell, M. J., & O’Halloran, C. (2011). Teaching academic langauge in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000067
• Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
• Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T., B., & Raftery, Adrian, E. (2016). Mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8(1), 289-317. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-021
• Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challange of academic language. In D. R. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (S. 112-133). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609664.008
• Tomasello, M. (2008). Acquiering linguistic constructions. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Child and adolescent devolpment. An advanced course (pp. 263-297). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0206
• Ufer, S., & Bochnik, K. (2020). The role of general and subject-specific language skills when learning mathematics in elementary school. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik [Journal for Mathematics Didactics], 48, 81-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00160-5
• Ure, J., & Ellis, J. (2014). Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistics sociology. In O. von Uribe-Villegas (Ed.), Issues in sociolinguistics (pp. 197-243). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110806687.197
• Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
• Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701708228
• Vom Hofe, R., Pekrun, R., Kleine, M., & Goetz, T. (2002). Projekt zur Analyse der Leistungsentwicklung in Mathematik (PALMA): Konstruktion des Regensburger Mathematikleistungstests für 5. bis 10 Klassen [Project for the analysis of performance development in mathematics (PALMA): Construction of the Regensburg mathematics achievement test for 5th to 10th grades]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik [Journal for Pedagogy], 45, 83-100. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3940
• Weiss, Z., & Meurers, D. (2019). Analyzing linguistic complexity and accuracy in academic language development of german across elementary and secondary school. In Processings of the 14^th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (pp. 380-393). Association for Computational Lingustics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-4440
• Wu, J. Y., Hsiao, Y. C., & Nian, M. W. (2020). Using supervised machine learning on large-scale online forums to classify course-related Facebook messages in predicting learning achievement within the personal learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1515085

APA

Bednorz, D., & Kleine, M. (2023). Unsupervised machine learning to classify language dimensions to constitute the linguistic complexity of mathematical word problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), em0719. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12588

Vancouver

Bednorz D, Kleine M. Unsupervised machine learning to classify language dimensions to constitute the linguistic complexity of mathematical word problems. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(1):em0719. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12588

AMA

Bednorz D, Kleine M. Unsupervised machine learning to classify language dimensions to constitute the linguistic complexity of mathematical word problems. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(1), em0719. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12588

Chicago

Bednorz, David, and Michael Kleine. "Unsupervised machine learning to classify language dimensions to constitute the linguistic complexity of mathematical word problems". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2023 18 no. 1 (2023): em0719. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12588

Harvard

Bednorz, D., and Kleine, M. (2023). Unsupervised machine learning to classify language dimensions to constitute the linguistic complexity of mathematical word problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), em0719. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12588

MLA

Bednorz, David et al. "Unsupervised machine learning to classify language dimensions to constitute the linguistic complexity of mathematical word problems". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023, em0719. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12588