Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table

Carmen Batanero; José M. Contreras; Carmen Díaz; Ernesto Sánchez

doi:10.29333/iejme/288

Full Text (PDF)

Carmen Batanero, José M. Contreras, Carmen Díaz, Ernesto Sánchez

More Detail

Abstract

The aim of this research was to assess the common knowledge of elementary probability in a sample of 183 prospective primary school teachers using and open-ended task, where teachers had to compute simple, compound and conditional probability from data presented in a two-way table. We base on theoretical ideas from the onto-semiotic approach to perform a semiotic analysis, in which we describe the mathematical objects and processes involved in the solutions of the tasks. Participants in the sample showed a weak common knowledge to compute simple, compound and conditional probabilities from a two-way table: they confused simple, compound and conditional probability; exchanged condition and event in conditional probabilities; confused probability and frequency or the union of events with the intersection. The semiotic analysis is used to provide and explanation for these errors in terms of semiotic conflicts. This list of difficulties expands what was found in previous research and may be used to reinforcing the preparation of prospective teachers to teach probability.

Keywords

assessment
simple
compound and conditional probability
teacher knowledge
2x2 tables

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2015, 3-16

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288

Publication date: 04 Apr 2015

Article Views: 3156

Article Downloads: 2447

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Batanero, C., Estepa, A., Godino, J. D., & Green, D. R. (1996). Intuitive strategies and preconceptions about association in contingency tables. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 151-169.
Batanero, C., Godino, J. D., & Cañizares, M. J. (2005) Simulation as a tool to train Pre-service School Teachers. In J. Addler (Ed.), Proceedings of ICMI First African Regional Conference [CD]. Johannesburg, South Africa: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction.
Begg, A., & Edwards, R. (1999, December). Teachers’ ideas about teaching statistics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Melbourne, Australia.
Contreras J. M., Batanero, C. Diaz, C, y Fernandes, J. A. (2011). Prospective teachers’ common and specialized knowledge in a probability task. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 766-765). Rzeszow, Poland: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/doc/cerme7/CERME7.pdf
Curcio, F. R. (1989). Developing graph comprehension. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Eco, U. (1979). Tratado de semiótica general [Treatise of general semiotics]. Barcelona, Spain: Lumen.
Eichler, A. (2011). Statistics teachers and classroom practices. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 175-186). New York, NY: Springer.
Estrada, A., & Díaz, C. (2006). Computing probabilities from two way tables: an exploratory study with future teachers. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Salvador (Bahia, Brazil): International Association for Statistical Education. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/Conference_Proceedings.php?p=ICOTS_6_2002.
Falk, R. (1986). Conditional probabilities: insights and difficulties. In R. Davidson, & J. Swift (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 292-297). Victoria, Canada: International Statistical Institute. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/Conference_Proceedings.php?p=ICOTS_2_1986.
Fernandes, J. A., & Barros, P. M. (2005). Dificuldades de futuros professores do 1º e 2º ciclos em estocástica (Pre-service primary school teachers difficulties in stochastics). In Actas do V Congresso Ibero-Americano de Educação Matemática (CIBEM) [CD]. Porto (Portugal): Faculdade de Ciências.
Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D.S., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). A Curriculum Framework for K-12 Statistics Education. GAISE Report. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/.
Franklin, C., & Mewborn, D., 2006. The statistical education of PreK-12 teachers: A shared responsibility. In G. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance − NCTM 2006 Yearbook (pp. 335-344). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: building blocks and instructional dilemas. In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in schools: challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 39-63). New York, NY: Springer.
Godino, J. D., Batanero, C., & Font, V. (2007). The onto-semiotic approach to research in mathematics education. ZDM- The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(1–2), 127–135.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1955). De la logique de l’enfant a la logique de l’adolescent (From the logic of children to the logic of adolescent). Paris: Presses Universitaries Framçaises.
Jenkins, H. M., & Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgement of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs, 79.
Jones, G. (2005). Introduction. In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Springer.
Konold, C. (1991). Understanding students' beliefs about probability. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 139-156). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Lecoutre, M. P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in "purely random" situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557-568.
Lee, H. S. & Hollebrands, K. (2008). Preparing to teach data analysis and probability with technology. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (Eds.) Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey: ICMI and IASE. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/Conference_Proceedings.php?p=Joint_ICMI-IASE_Study_2008.
MEC (2006). Real Decreto 1513/2006, de 7 de Diciembre, por el que se establecen las Enseñanzas Mínimas de la Educación Primaria Curricular guidelines for primary education. Madrid: Author.
MECD (2014). Real Decreto 126/2014, de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria Curricular guidelines for primary education. Madrid, Spain: Author.
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://standards.nctm.org/
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 165-173.
Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in schools: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 345-366). New York, NY: Springer.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgement of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic y A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 84 – 98). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

How to cite this article

APA

Batanero, C., Contreras, J. M., Díaz, C., & Sánchez, E. (2015). Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table . International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288

Vancouver

Batanero C, Contreras JM, Díaz C, Sánchez E. Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table . INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2015;10(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288

AMA

Batanero C, Contreras JM, Díaz C, Sánchez E. Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table . INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2015;10(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288

Chicago

Batanero, Carmen, José M. Contreras, Carmen Díaz, and Ernesto Sánchez. "Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table ". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2015 10 no. 1 (2015): 3-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288

Harvard

Batanero, C., Contreras, J. M., Díaz, C., and Sánchez, E. (2015). Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table . International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1), pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288

MLA

Batanero, Carmen et al. "Prospective Teachers’ Semiotic Conflicts in Computing Probabilities from a Two-Way Table ". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 10, no. 1, 2015, pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/288