Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning

Nagham Mohammad; Mihai Nica; Kimberly M. Levere; Rachel Okner

doi:10.29333/iejme/12960

Full Text (PDF)

Nagham Mohammad ¹ ^* , Mihai Nica ¹ , Kimberly M. Levere ¹ , Rachel Okner ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, CANADA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Out-of-class activities play a crucial role in student learning. However, student opinions on the design of these activities are rarely measured across several different classes. The purpose of this study is to understand students’ preferences and attitudes towards new “Engaged Mathematics Labs” in which professors and teaching assistants assisted students in completing an assignment during lab time. We analyze both qualitative and quantitative survey responses from ~200 first year students participating in “Engaged Mathematics Labs” across two different levels of mathematics classes at a large Canadian public university. Results indicate that students enjoy being able to work in groups regardless of major or gender. Moreover, students learned to effectively use resources available in the course to solve questions that deepen their understanding of course concepts. Understanding the student preferences from this study can help form the design of future learning activities and future pedagogical studies.

Keywords

mathematics labs
MathMatize
Top Hat
teaching assistants
collaborative learning

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 18, Issue 2, May 2023, Article No: em0732

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960

Publication date: 01 Apr 2023

Online publication date: 13 Feb 2023

Article Views: 1536

Article Downloads: 1156

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abd Algani, Y. (2018). Applying creative skills in teaching math at primary school stage. Journal of International Education, Economy and Business Conference Proceeding, 6, 26-33.
Abd Algani, Y. (2019). Innovative ways to teach mathematics: Are they employed in schools? Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(14), 496-514. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.612199
Afflerbach, P., & Harrison, C. (2022). What is engagement, how is it different from motivation, and how can I promote it? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(2), 217-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.679
Alexander, D., & DeAlba, L. (1997). Collaborative learning in a mathematics reasoning course. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 7(3), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511979708965860
Almeda, V., Baker, R., & Corbett, A. (2017). Help avoidance: When students should seek help, and the consequences of failing to do so. Teachers College Record, 119(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2017.1387481
Amerstorfer, C. M. (2020). Problem-based learning for preservice teachers of English as a foreign language. Colloquium New Philologies, 5, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.23963/cnp.2020.5.1.4
Anderson, J. (1995). Female students react to collaborative learning. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 5(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511979508965773
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J. S., & Pagani, L. S. (2008). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
Bigg, M., Brooks, I., Clayton, W., Darwen, J., Gough, G., Hyland, F., & Willmore, C. (2018). Bridging the gap: A case study of a partnership approach to skills development through student engagement in Bristol’s Green Capital year. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1499419
Brown, D. (2010). Implementation of the teamwork skills inventory among adolescents [Master’s thesis, Arizona State University].
Carlisle, S. K., Gourd, K., Rajkhan, S., & Nitta, K. (2017). Assessing the impact of community-based learning on students: The community based learning impact scale (CBLIS). Journal of Service-Learning in Higher Education, 6, 1-19.
Carmen, M., & Clara, F. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
Cooper, M. (1994). Cooperative chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(4), 307-311. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p307
De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1006-1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027800
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Graziano, A., & Raulin, M. (2013). Research methods: A process of inquiry. Pearson.
Hagelgans, N. L., Reynolds, B.E., Schwingendorf, K., Vidakovic, D., Dubinsky, E., Shahin, M., & Wimbish, G. J. Jr. (1995). A practical guide to cooperative learning in collegiate mathematics. The Mathematical Association of America.
Hattie, J (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Ingram, N., Holmes, M., Linsell, C., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Sullivan, P. (2019). Exploring an innovative approach to teaching mathematics through the use of challenging tasks: A New Zealand perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32, 497-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00266-1
John, C. (2017). Mathematics laboratory with Uncle John C. https://m.facebook.com/mathslabwithunclejohnc/posts
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Collective and individual learning, collaboration, competition and individualism. The World of Books.
Krause, A, J., Maccombs, R. J., & Wong, W. W. Y. (2021). Experiencing calculus through computational labs: Our department’s cultural drift toward modernizing mathematics instruction. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 31(3-5), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1799457
Lloyd, C. (2019). The effect of high impact practices on student thriving in college [PhD dissertation, Southeastern University].
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Michaelsen, L., Sweet, M., & Parmelee, D. (2008). Team-based learning: Small group learning’s next big step. In New directions for teaching & learning (pp. 116-116). Jossey Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.v2008:116
Mohammad, N., Dawoud, D., & Skrzydlo, D. (2018). Keeping the learner interested in class: Engaging students with Clickers. University of Waterloo Teaching and Learning Conference 2018.
Nadeem, H. A., Mehmood, E., & Haider, I. (2016). Cognitive and affective engagement in a comparative perspective: An evidence of formal and non-formal post graduate students. Commonwealth of Learning. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2580
National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.
Norwood, K. S. (1995). The effects of the use of problem solving and cooperative learning on the mathematics achievement of under-prepared college freshmen. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 5(3), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511979508965789
NSSE Annual Results. (2019). NSSE annual results. https://nsse.indiana.edu/research/annual-results/past-annual-results/nsse-annual-results-2019/index.html
Oates, G., Paterson, J., Reilly, I., & Woods, G. (2016). Seeing things from others’ points of view: Collaboration in undergraduate mathematics. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 26(3), 206-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1094683
Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1).
Rummel, N., Walker, E., & Aleven, V. (2016). Different futures of adaptive collaborative learning support. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 784-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0102-3
Shaqlaih, A., & Celik, M. (2013). Students’ preferences in mathematics labs. American Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 17-36.
Singh, H., Avtar, R., & Singh, V. P. (2010). A handbook for designing mathematics laboratory in schools. National Council of Educational Research and Training.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
Speight, L., Crawford, K., & Haddelsey, S. (2018). Towards measures of longitudinal learning gain in UK higher education: The challenge of meaningful engagement. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 196-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1476827
Sunday, A. O, Olaoye, A. E., & Audu, H. (2021). Effects of cooperative and competitive teaching strategy on statistics achievement of students in secondary schools in Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria. http://www.sfjesgs.com/index.php/SFJESGS/article/view/146
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Social, emotional, and personality development in context (pp. 531-547). Guilford Press.
Wise, A., & Schwarz, B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 423-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9267-5

How to cite this article

APA

Mohammad, N., Nica, M., Levere, K. M., & Okner, R. (2023). Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960

Vancouver

Mohammad N, Nica M, Levere KM, Okner R. Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(2):em0732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960

AMA

Mohammad N, Nica M, Levere KM, Okner R. Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(2), em0732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960

Chicago

Mohammad, Nagham, Mihai Nica, Kimberly M. Levere, and Rachel Okner. "Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2023 18 no. 2 (2023): em0732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960

Harvard

Mohammad, N., Nica, M., Levere, K. M., and Okner, R. (2023). Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960

MLA

Mohammad, Nagham et al. "Promoting engagement via engaged mathematics labs and supportive learning". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2023, em0732. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12960