International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9342-1
• Alqahtani, M., Powell, A., Webster, V., & Tirnovan, D. (2022). How a measuring perspective influences pre-service teachers’ reasoning about fractions with discrete and continuous models. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(3), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.255
• Bas, G. (2021). Improving efficacy of pre-service teachers in educational research through peer review process. The New Educational Review, 63, 214-225. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.21.63.1.17
• Bley, N. S., & Thornton, C. A. (2001). Teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. PRO-ED.
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Buchanan, M., & Stern, J. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the benefits of peer review. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2012.643654
• Carpenter, T. P., Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, S. (2004). Powerful practices in mathematics & science. National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
• Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2020). Classroom discussions using math talk in elementary classrooms. Math Solutions. https://mathsolutions.com/uncategorized/using-math-talk-in-elementary-classrooms/
• Charalambous, C. Y., Hill, H. C., Chin, M. J., & McGinn, D. (2020). Mathematical content knowledge and knowledge for teaching: Exploring their distinguishability and contribution to student learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(6), 579-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09443-2
• Cramer, K., & Henry, A. (2002). Using manipulative models to build number sense for addition of fractions. In Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions: Yearbook (pp. 41-48). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Crespo, S. (2018). Generating, appraising, and revising representations of mathematics teaching with prospective teachers. In R. Zazkis, & P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education, advances in mathematics education (pp. 249-264). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62692-5_12
• Crespo, S., & Nicol, C. (2006). Challenging pre-service teachers’ mathematical understanding: The case of division by zero. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18138.x
• Crespo, S., Oslund, J. A., & Parks, A. N. (2011). Imagining mathematics teaching practice: Prospective teachers generate representations of a class discussion. ZDM, 43, 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0296-z
• Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching: Evaluation instrument. Danielson Group.
• Dijks, M. A., Brummer, L., & Kostons, D. (2018). The anonymous reviewer: The relationship between perceived expertise and the perceptions of peer feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1258-1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1447645
• Griffith, A. N., Johnson, H. E., Larson, R. W., & Buttitta, E. K. (2020). A qualitative examination of critical feedback processes in project-based youth programs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101892. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101892
• Hauser, J. (2009). Concrete-representational-abstract instructional approach. Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8. http://www.k8accesscenter.org/training_resources/CRA_Instructional_Approach.asp
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Breyfogle, L. (2005). Questioning our patterns of questioning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(9), 484-489. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.10.9.0484
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
• Hodges, T. E., Cady, J., & Collins, R. L. (2008). Fraction representation: The not-so-common denominator among textbooks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.14.2.0078
• Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.1.f
• Kaya, S., & Yildiz, N. G. (2023). Using the concrete–representational–abstract sequence to teach math skills to a student with autism spectrum disorder in a general education classroom. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2180539
• Kennedy, M. (2006). Knowledge and vision in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285639
• Lim, W., Son, J.-W., & Kang, S.-H. (2021). How reducing discomfort impacts peer assessments of pre-service teachers. Sustainability, 13(11), 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116435
• London, M. (1995). Giving feedback: Source-centered antecedents and consequences of constructive and destructive feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 5(3), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(95)90001-2
• Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100-115.
• Luo, F., Lo, J., & Yuh, C. L. (2011). Fundamental fraction knowledge of pre-service elementary teachers: A cross-national study in the united states and taiwan. School Science and Mathematics, 111(4), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00074.x
• Machin, T. M., & Jeffries, C. H. (2017). Threat and opportunity: The impact of social inclusion and likeability on anonymous feedback, self-esteem, and belonging. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 1-6. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.055
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Novita, R., Herman, T., Dasari, D., & Putra, M. (2022). Analyzing second-year university students’ rational number understanding: A case on interpreting and representing fraction. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1747-1762. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1747
• Siegler, R., Carpenter, T., Fennell, F., Geary, D. C., Lewis, J., Okamoto, Y., Thompson, L., & Wray, J. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: A practice guide. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
• Tobias, J. M., Olanoff, D., & Lo, J. (2012). A research synthesis of pre-service teachers’ knowledge of multiplying and dividing fractions. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249

APA

Vance, L., Caniglia, J., & Meadows, M. (2023). Pre-service special education teachers’ learning through recorded mini-lessons and peer review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(4), em0754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13714

Vancouver

Vance L, Caniglia J, Meadows M. Pre-service special education teachers’ learning through recorded mini-lessons and peer review. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(4):em0754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13714

AMA

Vance L, Caniglia J, Meadows M. Pre-service special education teachers’ learning through recorded mini-lessons and peer review. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(4), em0754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13714

Chicago

Vance, Lindsay, Joanne Caniglia, and Michelle Meadows. "Pre-service special education teachers’ learning through recorded mini-lessons and peer review". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2023 18 no. 4 (2023): em0754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13714

Harvard

Vance, L., Caniglia, J., and Meadows, M. (2023). Pre-service special education teachers’ learning through recorded mini-lessons and peer review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(4), em0754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13714

MLA

Vance, Lindsay et al. "Pre-service special education teachers’ learning through recorded mini-lessons and peer review". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2023, em0754. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13714