Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom

Khalid S. Alzahrani

Full Text (PDF)

Khalid S. Alzahrani

More Detail

Abstract

Based on theoretical notions of metacognition in light of the reality of mathematics learning and teaching in Saudi Arabia, this study aimed to explore a teacher’s and students’ perceptions of the nature of the relationship between cooperative learning and an improvement in metacognition. Consequently, a case study design was favoured in order to suit the research agenda and meet its aims. The participants consisted of one case study class from a secondary school in Saudi Arabia. Semi-structured interviews and classroom observation were used for data collection. The findings of the data analysis asserts that metacognition can be assisted through the creation of a suitable socio-cultural context to encourage the social interaction represented in cooperative learning. This has a role in motivating the establishment of metacognition, as the absence of this social interaction would impede this type of learning. The importance of the student’s role in learning through metacognition was asserted by this study.

Keywords

Metacognition
Cooperative Learning and Mathematics Learning

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 12, Issue 3, October 2017, 475-491

Publication date: 19 Jul 2017

Article Views: 4242

Article Downloads: 4851

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. (2001). Let's Think! A Programme for Developing Thinking with Five and Six Year Olds.: Slough: NFER Nelson.
Artz, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and instruction, 9(2), 137-175.
Artzt, A. F., & Newman, C. M. (1997). How to use cooperative learning in the mathematics class: ERIC.
Azevedo, R., & Aleven, V. (2013). Metacognition and learning technologies: an overview of current interdisciplinary research International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 1-16): Springer.
Bernard, M., & Bachu, E. (2015). Enhancing the Metacognitive Skill of Novice Programmers Through Collaborative Learning Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp. 277-298): Springer.
Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 153-172.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self Regulation and Mysterious Mechanisms. In R. K. Franz E. Weinert (Ed.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding (3 ed., pp. 65-117). The University of Michigan: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Buratti, S., & Allwood, C. M. (2015). Regulating Metacognitive Processes—Support for a Meta-metacognitive Ability Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp. 17-38): Springer.
Chinn, C. (2010). Collaborative and cooperative learning Encyclopedia of cross-cultural school psychology (pp. 229-232): Springer.
Coles, A. (2013). Being alongside: for the teaching and learning of mathematics: Springer Science & Business Media.
Desoete, A. (2007). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 705-730.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Goos, M., & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metacognitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 30(3), 229-260.
Hartman, H. (2015). Engaging Adolescent Students’ Metacognition Through WebQuests: A Case Study of Embedded Metacognition Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp. 135-166): Springer.
Hinsz, V. B. (2004). Metacognition and mental models in groups: An illustration with metamemory of group recognition memory. Paper presented at the Annual Society for Experimental Social Psychology Preconference on Small Groups, Fourth, Oct, 1996, Sturbridge Village, MA, US; Portions of this research were presented at the aforementioned conference.
Hogan, M. J., Dwyer, C. P., Harney, O. M., Noone, C., & Conway, R. J. (2015). Metacognitive skill development and applied systems science: A framework of metacognitive skills, self-regulatory functions and real-world applications Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 75-106): Springer.
Hurme, T.-R., Järvelä, S., Merenluoto, K., & Salonen, P. (2015). What Makes Metacognition as Socially Shared in Mathematical Problem Solving? Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (pp. 259-276): Springer.
Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition Animal mind—human mind (pp. 201-224): Springer.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310.
Larkin, S. (2006). Collaborative group work and individual development of metacognition in the early years. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 7-27.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education: Revised and Expanded from Case Study Research in Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Wiley.
Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365-394.
Moga, A. (2012). Metacognitive Training Effects on Students Mathematical Performance from Inclusive Classrooms. (PhD), Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca.
Mokos, E., & Kafoussi, S. (2013). Elementary Student'Spontaneous Metacognitive Functions in Different Types of Mathematical Problems. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 242-267.
Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the Two Concepts Which Will Help Us Understand the Underlying Nature of Interactive Learning. Retrieved from ERIC website: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED448443
Pannitz, R. (1996). A definition of collaborative vs. cooperative learning. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching. http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collaborative-learning/panitz-paper.cfm.
Rockwood, R. (1995). National Teaching and Learning Forum. Paper presented at the National Teaching and Learning Forum.
Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M., & Stevens, R. (2012). Effect of cooperative problem-based lab instruction on metacognition and problem-solving skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(6), 700-706.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research: Sage Publications.

How to cite this article

APA

Alzahrani, K. S. (2017). Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 475-491.

Vancouver

Alzahrani KS. Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2017;12(3):475-91.

AMA

Alzahrani KS. Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2017;12(3), 475-491.

Chicago

Alzahrani, Khalid S.. "Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2017 12 no. 3 (2017): 475-491.

Harvard

Alzahrani, K. S. (2017). Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), pp. 475-491.

MLA

Alzahrani, Khalid S. "Metacognition and Cooperative Learning in the Mathematics Classroom". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2017, pp. 475-491.