International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Adebule, S. O. (2009). Reliability and levels of difficulty of objective test items in a Mathematics achievement test: A study of ten senior secondary schools in five local government areas of Akure, Ondo State. Educational Research and Reviews, 4(11), 585-587.
• Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754
• Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.
• Arbin, N., Ghani, S. A., & Hamzah, F. M. (2014, June). Teaching calculus using module based on cooperative learning strategy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1602(1), 497-501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4882531
• Arbini, C. (2016). The Impact of Graphing Calculators on Math Achievement: A Quantitative, Longevity Analysis. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
• Awang, N., & Hamid, N. N. A. (2015, October). Students attitude towards calculus subject: A case-study using structural equation modeling. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1682(1), 050012.1-050012.5). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932503
• Awang, N., Ilias, M. R., Che Hussain, W. S. E., & Mokhtar, S. F. (2013, April). Students attitude towards calculus subject: Bumiputera case-study. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1522(1), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4801151
• Ayub, A. F. M., Sembok, T. M., & Luan, W. S. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus using computer. Semantics scholar, 1-10. Retrieved from http://atcm.mathandtech.org/ep2008/papers_full/2412008_15028.pdf
• Azmin, N. H. (2016). Effect of the Jigsaw-Based Cooperative Learning Method on Student Performance in the General Certificate of Education Advanced-Level Psychology: An Exploratory Brunei Case Study. International Education Studies, 9(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9nlp91
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Retrieved from http://jte.sagepub.com
• Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390010022590
• Boopathiraj, C., & Chellamani, K. (2013). Analysis of test items on difficulty level and discrimination index in the test for research in education. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 2(2), 189-193.
• Boz Yaman, B. (2019). A Multiple Case Study: What Happens in Peer Tutoring of Calculus Studies?. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst/328336
• Bransford, Brown, C. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Brown, J. D. (2001). Point-biserial correlation coefficients. Shiken: JLT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 5(3), 13–17. Retrieved from http://jlt.org/test/bro_12.htm or http://jlt.org/test/PDF/Brown12.pdf
• Castellan, C. M. (2010). Quantitative and qualitative research: A view for clarity. International journal of education, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i2.446
• Chinnappan, M., & Forrester, T. (2014). Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 871-896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0131-x
• Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Psychology Press.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Approaches to qualitative data analysis. Research methods in education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
• Cornelius, M., & Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40569-8
• Costa, P., Oliveira, P. & Ferrão, M. E. (2009). Statistical issues on multiple choice tests in engineering assessment. In Proceedings of the 37th Sefi Conference, Rotterdam, Delft University of Technology, 1-7.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Demircioglu, G., Aslan, A., & Yadigaroglu, M. (2014). Exploratory Factor Analysis Study for the Scale of High School Students’ Attitudes towards Chemistry. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 5(1), 38-45.
• Ding, L., & Beichner, R. (2009). Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(2), 0201039(1-17). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020103
• Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C., & Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: Student conceptions and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00045.x
• Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Potgieter, M. (2005). Undergraduate students’ performance and confidence in procedural and conceptual mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500271107
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Third Edition. Sage publications.
• Fraenkel, J. R, Norman E., & Wallen. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGrow-Hill.
• Fraser, B. J. (1981). Tosra: Test of science related attitudes: Handbook. Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Gelo, O. C. G. (2012). On research methods and their philosophical assumptions: “raising the consciousness of researchers” again. Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 14(2), 111-130.
• Getie, B. (2013). Mathematics Subject Area Method I for Secondary. Post Graduate Diploma in Teaching, 2(1), 3-6.
• Graham, M., Milanowski, A., & Miller, J. (2012). Measuring and Promoting Inter-Rater Agreement of Teacher and Principal Performance Ratings. Online Submission, ED532066, 1-33.
• Gray, A. J. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning. Saskatchewan School Trustees Association.
• Gray, D. E. (2013). Doing research in the real world. Sage Publications.
• Green, S. B., & Salkind, N, J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Internal consistency estimates of reliability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Heibert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538
• Highfield, K, & Goodwin, K. (2008). A review of recent research in early mathematics learning technology. In Navigating charts and charting directions: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of MERG.Brisbane: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
• Hoover, W. A. (1996, August). The practice implications of constructivism. SEDL Letter, 9(3). Retrieved from www.sedl.org/pubs/sedletter/v09n03/practice.html
• Huang, C. H. (2011). Investigating the attitudes toward calculus of engineering students in Taiwan. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 9(2), 80-85.
• Jaafar, R., & Lin, Y. (2017). Assessment for Learning in the Calculus Classroom: A Proactive Approach to Engage Students in Active Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 503-520.
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed approaches. Sage Publications.
• Kadijević, Đ. (1999). Conceptual tasks in mathematics education. The Teaching of Mathematics, 2(1), 59-64. Retrieved from https://eudml.org/doc/255835
• Kandemir, M. A., & Demirbag-Keskin, P. (2019). Effect of Graphing Calculator Program Supported Problem Solving Instruction on Mathematical Achievement and Attitude. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 203-223. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1197997.pdf
• Khashan, K. H. (2014). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of rational numbers for Riyadh elementary school teachers. Journal of Education and Human development, 3(4), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a17
• Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2013). Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice (Vol. 7). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1650-y
• Kilicman, A., Hassan, M. A., & Husain, S. K. (2010). Teaching and learning using mathematics software “The New Challenge”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.2010.12.085
• Kiliyanni, A. L., & Sivaraman, S. (2016). The perception-reality gap in financial literacy: Evidence from the most literate state in India. International Review of Economics Education, 23, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2016.07.001
• Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 1(1), 16. ed. M. Orey. Retrieved from https://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php
• Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. New York, NY: Methuen.
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Kridler, P. G. (2012). Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: A Balanced Approach? (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3521915)
• Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
• Kukla, A. (2013). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203130995
• Lavicza, Z. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics teaching at the university level. Zdm, 42(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0225-1
• Lee, A. (2012). The effects of computer-based learning activities and school contextual factors on student math achievement. Leadership and Policy Quarterly, 1(1), 58-72. Retrieved from https://www.untestedideas.com/uploads/3/1/1/6/3116134/factors_affecting_student_math_achievement.pdf
• Liao, S. C., Hunt, E. A., & Chen, W. (2010). Comparison between inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement in performance assessment. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 39(8), 613-618.
• Lim-Teo, S. K., Ahuja, O. P., & Lee, P. Y. (1999). Tertiary and junior college students’ attitude towards mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 4(1), 15-33.
• Maltas, D., & Prescott, A. (2014). Calculus-based mathematics: An Australian endangered species?. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 28(2), 39-49.
• Mazana, Y. M., Suero Montero, C., & Olifage, C. R. (2019). Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Learning Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematcs Edcation, 14(1), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3997
• McMahon, M. (1997). Social constructivism and the World Wide Web-A paradigm for learning’, paper presented to ASCILITE conference, (327), 411-417. Perth, Australia. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/Mcmahon/Mcmahon.html
• Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a quantitative research thesis. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 19-32.
• Ocal, M. F. (2017). The Effect of GeoGebra on Students’ Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Applications of Derivative. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p67
• Oktaviyanthi, R., & Supriani, Y. (2015). Experimental Design: Utilizing Microsoft Mathematics in Teaching and Learning Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(25), 75 -83. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1902.63-76
• Orey, M. (2010). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching and technology. North Charleston: CreateSpace.
• Othman, Z. S., Tarmuji, N. H., & Hilmi, Z. A. G. (2017, April). Students perception on the usage of PowerPoint in learning calculus. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1830(1), 050005(1-7). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4980942
• Pallant, J., & Manual, S. S. (2010). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Berkshine, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Parrot, M. A. S., & Leong, K. E. (2018) Impact of using graphing calculator in problem solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
• Peteros, E., Columna, D., Etcuban, J. O., Almerino, Jr., P., & Almerino, J. G. (2019). Attitude and Academic Achievement of High School Students in Mathematics Under the Conditional Cash Transfer Program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5770
• Pilgrim, M. E. (2010). A concepts for calculus intervention: Measuring student attitudes toward mathematics and achievement in calculus (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Libraries). Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses @ Colorado State University.(Publication No. AAT3419112).
• Roth, W. M. (1999). Authentic school science: Intellectual traditions. Learning and knowledge. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
• Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5^th Ed.). Pearson education Limited, Harlow.
• Siyepu, S. (2013). The zone of proximal development in the learning of mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za
• Sofroniou, A., & Poutos, K. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of group work in mathematics. Education Sciences, 6(30), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030030
• Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and conceptual knowledge: exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 169 -181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828
• Summit, R., & Rickards, T. (2013). A constructivist approach to mathematics laboratory classes. In Proceedings of the 9th DELTA Conference on Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics and Statisitcs (pp. 190-198).
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
• Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311-325. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26357806
• Yimer, S. (2016). Use of Computer Interactive Simulation on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Calculus (Doctoral proposal), UNISA, 1-4.
• Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
• Young, C. Y., Georgiopoulos, M., Hagen, S. C., Geiger, C. L., Dagley-Falls, M. A., Islas, A. L., ... & Bradbury, E. E. (2011). Improving student learning in calculus through applications. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(5), 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550944
• Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The Effect of Using GeoGebra on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High School Mathematics Students. The Journal Asian Social Science, 8(11), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p102
• Zulnaidi, H., & Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2017). The effectiveness of the GeoGebra software: the intermediary role of procedural knowledge on students’ conceptual knowledge and their achievement in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2155-2180. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01219a

APA

Yimer, S. T., & Feza, N. N. (2020). Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936

Vancouver

Yimer ST, Feza NN. Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1):em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936

AMA

Yimer ST, Feza NN. Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1), em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936

Chicago

Yimer, Sirak Tsegaye, and Nosisi Nellie Feza. "Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 1 (2020): em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936

Harvard

Yimer, S. T., and Feza, N. N. (2020). Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936

MLA

Yimer, Sirak Tsegaye et al. "Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936