International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Aberdein, A. (2012). The parallel structure of mathematical reasoning. In A. Aberdein & J. Dove (Eds.), The argument of mathematics (pp. 351–370).
• Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2008). Doctoral students’ use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9149-x
• Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In Mathematics, Teachers and Children (pp. 216–235). Hoodes & Stoughton: Londers.
• Boero, P., Garuti, R., & Mariotti M, A. (1996). Some dynamic mental processes underlying producing and proving conjectures. In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepúlveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education PME-XX, vol. 2 (pp. 121 – 128). Valencia.
• Bromley, D. B. (1986). The case-study method in psychology and related disciplines. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Buchbinder, B., & Pedemonte O. (2011). Examining the role of examples in proving processes through a cognitive lens : the case of triangular numbers, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0311-z
• Cañadas, M. C., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2009). Using a model to describe students’ inductive reasoning in problem solving.
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Identifying Kinds of Reasoning in Collective Argumentation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 16(3), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2014.921131
• De Villiers, M. D. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17–24.
• Douek, N. (1999). Some Remarks About Argumentation And Mathematical Proof And Their Educational Implications. In I. Schwank (Ed.), European Research in Mathematics Education I (pp. 125–139). Forschungsinstitut fur mathematikdidaktik, Osnabruck.
• Ellis, A. E., Lockwood, E., Williams, C. C. W., Dogan, M. F., & Knuth, E. (2012). Middle school students’ example use in conjecture exploration and justification. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III, 234–283. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/007/07
• Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 396–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/749651
• Iannone, P., Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Simpson, A., & Weber, K. (2012). Does Generating Examples Aid Proof Production? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9299-0
• Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2010). The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 27(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802584513
• Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling Mathematical Argumentation : The Importance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8
• Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9059-8
• Knipping, C. (2003). Argumentation structures in classroom proving situations. In M. Hanna & G. Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the third congress of the european society for research in mathematics education. Bellaria, Italy, ERME.
• Knipping, C. (2004). Argumentation structures in classroom proving situations’. In M. Mariotti (Ed.), Proceedings of CERME (Vol. 3).
• Laamena, C. M. (2017). Karakteristik Warrant Dalam Menemukan Counter Example. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. Senasif 2017 (pp. 212-222).
• Laamena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Muksar, M. (2018). Analysis of the Students’ Argumentation based on the level of Ability: Study on the Process of Mathematical Proof Analysis of the Students’ Argumentation based on the level of Ability: Study on the Process of Mathematical Proof. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 0–7.
• Lockwood, E., Ellis, A., Knuth, E., Dogan, M. F., & Williams, C. (2013). Strategically Chosen Examples Leading to Proof Insight: A Case Study of a Mathematician’s Proving Process. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 245–252).
• Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd ed). Harlow: Pearson.
• Mason, J., Watson, A., Mason, J., & Watson, A. (1984). Getting Students to Create Boundary Examples. Retrieved from http://mrbartonmaths.com/resourcesnew/8.%20Research/Inquries/Getting%20
• students%20to%20create%20Boundary%20Examples%20-%20Watson%20and%20Mason.pdf
• Mejía-Ramosa, J. P., & Inglish, M. (2008). What are the argumentative activities associated with proof? In M. Joubert (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 28(2) June 2008 (pp. 67–72).
• Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., & Peterson, B. E. (2011). Mathematics for Elementary Teachers a Contemporary Approach (NINTH EDIT). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Watson, S. (2014). What makes a claim an acceptable mathematical argument in the secondary classroom? A preliminary analysis of teachers’ warrants in the context of an Algebra Task. In S. Pope (Ed.), British Congress of Mathematics Education (pp. 247–254).
• Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2012). “Warrant” revisited: Integrating mathematics teachers’ pedagogical and epistemological considerations into Toulmin’s model for argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9345-y
• Pedemonte, B. (2003). What kind of proof can be constructed following an abductive argumentation. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on European Research in Mathematics Education.
• Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9057-x
• Reid, D. A. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/749867
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Second Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
• Ubuz, B., Dincer, S., & Bulbul, A. (2012). Argumentation in Undergraduate Math Courses: A Study on Proof Generation. Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 163–170.
• Ubuz, B., Dincer, S., & Bülbül, A. (2013). Argumentation in Undergraduate Math Courses: A Study on Definition Construction. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 313–320). Kiel, Germany: PME.
• Viholainen, A. (2011). The view of mathematics and argumentation. In E. S. Marta Pytlak, T. Rowland, E. Swoboda Pytlak (Eds.), European Society for Research in Mathematics 7. Rzeszów, Poland.
• Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

APA

Laamena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Muksar, M. (2018). How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836

Vancouver

Laamena CM, Nusantara T, Irawan EB, Muksar M. How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2018;13(3):185-98. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836

AMA

Laamena CM, Nusantara T, Irawan EB, Muksar M. How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2018;13(3), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836

Chicago

Laamena, Christina M., Toto Nusantara, Edy Bambang Irawan, and Makbul Muksar. "How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2018 13 no. 3 (2018): 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836

Harvard

Laamena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., and Muksar, M. (2018). How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), pp. 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836

MLA

Laamena, Christina M. et al. "How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2018, pp. 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3836