International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Abramovich, S., & Pieper, A. (1996). Fostering recursive thinking in combinatorics through the use of manipulatives and computing technology. Mathematics Educator, 7(1), 4-12.
• Adey, P., & Csapó, B. (2012). Developing and assessing scientific reasoning. In Csapó, B., & Szabó, G. (Eds.), Framework for diagnostic assessment of science (pp.17-53). Budapest, Hungary: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.
• Batanero, C., Godino J. D., & Navarro-Pelayo, V. (1997). Combinatorial reasoning and its assessment. In Gal, I., & Garfield, J. B. (Eds.), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education (pp. 239-252). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
• Bitner, B. L. (1991). Formal operational reasoning modes: Predictors of critical thinking abilities and grades assigned by teachers in science and mathematics for students in grades nine through twelve. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280307
• Cavallo, A. M. L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability and students’ understanding and problem solving of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 625-656.
• Csapó, B. (1988). A kombinatív képesség struktúrája és fejlődése [Structure and development of combinatorial ability]. Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Csapó, B. (2001). A kombinativ képesség fejlődésének elemzése országos reprezentativ felmérés alapján [An analysis of the development of combinative ability: a large-scale survey]. Magyar Pedagógia, 101(4), 511-530.
• Csapó, B. (2003). A képességek fejlődése és iskolai fejlesztése [The development and classroom fostering of skills]. Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
• Csapó, B., Pásztor, A., & Molnár, Gy. (2015). Online assessment of combinatorial reasoning: Perspectives of measuring a challenging construct. 16th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus, August 25-29, 2015. 1209.
• DeTemple, D., & Webb, W. (2014). Combinatorial reasoning. An introduction to the art of counting. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• English, L. D. (1991). Young children’s combinatoric strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(5), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367908
• English, L. D. (1993). Children’s strategies for solving two- and three-dimensional combinatorial problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/749347
• English, L. D. (2016). Revealing and capitalising on young children’s mathematical potential. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(7), 1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0809-5
• Fishbein, E., & Grosman, A. (1997). Schemata and intuitions in combinatorial reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002914202652
• Gál-Szabó, Zs. & Korom, E. (2018): Combinatorial reasoning among 4th and 6th grade pupils: preliminary results of a large-scale study. In Vidákovich T., & Fűz, N. (Eds.), 16th Conference on Educational Assessment - Programme and abstracts, Szeged, Hungary: Szegedi Tudományegyetem.
• Github (2019). R script and random sample. https://github.com/bfakos/combinatiorial_reasoning
• Hadar, N., & Hadass, R. (1981). The road to solving a combinatorial problem is strewn with pitfalls. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(4), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308141
• Hajdúné Holló, K. (2004). Az elemi kombinatív képesség fejlődésének kritériumorientált diagnosztikus feltárása 4–8 évesek körében [Criterion-referenced diagnostic assessment of the development of the combinative ability of 4-8-year-olds]. Magyar Pedagógiai, 104(3), 263-292.
• Halani, A. (2012). Students’ ways of thinking about enumerative combinatorics solution sets: the odometer category. In Brown, S., Larsen, S., Marrongelle, K. & Oehrtman M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Portland, OR, USA: The Special Interest Group of the Mathematics Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 59-68.
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. NY, USA: Basic Books. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315009674 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009674
• Kapur, J. N. (1970). Combinatorial analysis and school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381598
• Kosztolányi, J., Pintér, K. Bagota, M., & Gábor Dancs, G. (2016). How do students solve combinatorial problems? – Some results of a research about difficulties and strategies of Hungarian students. In Csíkos, Cs., Rausch, A. & Szitányi, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: PME40. Szeged, Hungary: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 115-122.
• Lockwood, E. (2013). A model of students’ combinatorial thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 251-265. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.008
• Lockwood, E. (2015). The Strategy of Solving Smaller, Similar Problems in the Context of Combinatorial Enumeration. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 339-362. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0016-8
• Mashiach-Eizenberg M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2004). Students’ verification strategies for combinatorial problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0601_2
• Melusova, J., & Vidermanova, K. (2015). Upper-secondary Students’ Strategies for Solving Combinatorial Problems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1703-1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.223
• Mwamwenda, T. S. (1999). Undergraduate and graduate students’ combinatorial reasoning and formal operations. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160(4), 503-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221329909595563
• Nagy József (2004). Az elemi kombinatív képesség kialakulásának kritériumorientált diagnosztikus feltárása [Criterion referenced diagnostic assessment of basic combinatorial skills]. Iskolakultúra, 14(8), 3-20.
• Piaget, J. (2005). The psychology of intelligence. NY, USA: Routlege Classics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981528
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2004). Gyermeklélektan [Child psychology]. Budapest, Hungary: Osiris Kiadó.
• Poddiakov, A. (2011). Didactic objects for development of young children’s combinatorial experimentation and causal-experimental thought. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2011.571001
• R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org
• Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of life reviews, 7(2), 156-179. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002
• Szabó, Zs. G., & Korom, E. (2017). Developing combinatorial reasoning among third grade pupils. 17th Biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Tampere, Finland, August 28-September 2, 2017. 448-449.
• Szitányi, J., & Csíkos, Cs. (2015). Performance and strategy use in combinatorial reasoning among pre-service elementary teachers. In Beswick, K., Muir, T. és Wells, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Hobart, Australia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 4225-4232.
• Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3
• Yilmaz, A., & Alp, E. (2006). Students’ understanding of matter: the effect of reasoning ability and grade level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 22-31. http://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90013A

APA

Gál-Szabó, Z., & Bede-Fazekas, Á. (2020). Formalization of Odometer Thinking and Indices for the Classification of Combinatorial Strategies. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5882

Vancouver

Gál-Szabó Z, Bede-Fazekas Á. Formalization of Odometer Thinking and Indices for the Classification of Combinatorial Strategies. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1):em0546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5882

AMA

Gál-Szabó Z, Bede-Fazekas Á. Formalization of Odometer Thinking and Indices for the Classification of Combinatorial Strategies. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1), em0546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5882

Chicago

Gál-Szabó, Zsófia, and Ákos Bede-Fazekas. "Formalization of Odometer Thinking and Indices for the Classification of Combinatorial Strategies". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 1 (2020): em0546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5882

Harvard

Gál-Szabó, Z., and Bede-Fazekas, Á. (2020). Formalization of Odometer Thinking and Indices for the Classification of Combinatorial Strategies. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5882

MLA

Gál-Szabó, Zsófia et al. "Formalization of Odometer Thinking and Indices for the Classification of Combinatorial Strategies". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, em0546. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5882