International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Alperin, R., & Lang. R, (2006) One-, Two-, and Multi-fold Origami Axioms. Origami Fourth International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics and Education. A K Peters Ltd.
• Boakes, N. (2009). Origami instruction in the middle school mathematics classroom: Its impact on spatial visualization and geometry knowledge of students. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 32(7), 1-12.
• Boakes, N. (2015). Crossing borders with origami in mathematics education. Paper presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved [2018], from the AERA Online Paper Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2009.11462060
• Boo, Y. J., & Leong, K. E. (2016). Teaching and Learning Geometry in Primary School Using GeoGebra. Paper presented at 21^st Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, at Pattaya, Thailand.
• Bu, L., Mumba, F., Wright, M., & Henson, H. (2012). Teaching mathematics using GeoGebra: integrating pedagogy and content in teacher education. In: D. Martinovic, D. McDougall, & Z. Karadag (Eds.), Technology in Mathematics Education: Contemporary Issues (pp. 91-115). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.
• Budinski, N. (2015). Origami and Technological Prospectives in Mathematical Education. T1.1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/isis-summit-vienna-2015-T1.1010
• Budinski, N., Lavizca Z. & Fenyvesi, K. (2018). Ideas for using GeoGebra and Origami in Teaching Regular Polyhedrons Lessons. K-12 STEM Education 4(1), 297-303.
• Bulut, M., Akcakin, H. U., & Kaya, G. (2016). The Effects of GeoGebra on Third Grade Primary Students’ Academic Achievements in Fractions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 347-355.
• Fenyvesi, K., Budinski, N., & Lavicza, Z. (2014a). Two Solutions to an Unsolvable Problem: Connecting Origami and GeoGebra in a Serbian High School. In G. Greenfield, G. Hart, & R. Sarhangi (Eds.), Proceedings of Bridges 2014: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture (pp. 95-102). Phoenix: Tessellations Publishing.
• Fenyvesi, K., Budinski, N. & Lavicza, Z. (2014b). Problem Solving with Hands-on and Digital Tools: Connecting Origami and Geogebra in Mathematics Education, Тhe Closing Conference of the project Visuality & Mathematics, Belgrade, Serbia, September, 17-19, 2014, pp. 25-38.
• Fiol, M. L., Dasquens, N., & Prat, M. (2011). Student Teachers Introduce Origami in Kindergarten and Primary Schools: Froebel Revisited. In P. Wang-Iverson, R. J. Lang, & M. Yim (Eds.), Origami 5: Fifth international meeting of origami science, mathematics and education (pp. 151-165). New York: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10971-16
• Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
• Georgeson, J. (2011). Fold in Origami and Unfold Math. Mathematics Teaching in Middle School, 16(6), 354- 361.
• Golan, M. (2011). Origametria and the van Hiele Theory of Teaching Geometry. Origami, 5, 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10971-15
• Gur, H., & Kobak-Demir, M. (2017). Teaching via Origami: The Views of Secondary Mathematics Teacher Trainees. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(15), 65-71.
• Hull, T. (2002). The Combinatorics of Flat Foldis Survey. The Proceedings of the Third International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15735-5
• Hull, T. (2003). Counting mountain-valley assignments for flat folds. Ars Combinatoria, 67.
• Huzita, H. (1989). Axiomatic Development of Origami Geometry. Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting of Origami Science and Technology, 143-158.
• Huzita, H. (1992). Understanding Geometry through Origami Axioms. COET91: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Origami in Education and Therapy, British Origami Society, 37-70.
• Justin, J. (1986). Résolution par le pliage de l’équation du troisième degré et applications géométriques. L’Ouvert - Journal de l’APMEP d’Alsace et de l’IREM de Strasbourg (in French), 42, 9-19.
• Lang, R. (2003). Origami and Geometric Constructions.
• Lang, R. (2009). Mathematical Methods in Origami Design. Bridges 2009: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture, 13-20.
• Miller, Y (2007). A Phenomenological Exploration of Brief Art Therapy Through Folding Two-dimensional Drawings Created by an Adult Population, Faculty of the College of Nursing and Health Profession (PhD Thesis), Drexel University.
• Motaweh, D., Fukuyama, H., & Issa, A. (2014). Effectiveness of the proposed training program on attention and working memory for children with special needs in Saudi Arabia. Life Science Journal, 11(8), 461-474.
• Nishiyama, Y. (2012). Miura folding: Applying origami to space exploration. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 79(2), 269-279.
• Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Hum. Dev. 15, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
• Shalev, H. (2005). Origami in Education and Therapy. Theragam.com New York’s Educational Therapeutic Origami Program for Children and Adolescents.
• Shumakov, K., & Shumakov, Y. (2001). The folding: A method of bilateral development: Based on the art of origami. Retrieved from www.oriland.com
• Shumakova, E. R. (2000). Functional interhemispheric asymmetry of a brain in dynamics of bimanual activity at children 7-11 years old at origami training (Ph.D. thesis). Publishing house of the Rostov State University.
• Službeni glasnik RS, (2017) br. 6/13.
• Susac, A., Bubic, A., Vrbanc, A., & Planinic, M. (2014). Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679
• Zarei, A., & Malekian, F. (2015). The Role of Teaching Based on Art Therapy with Origami Method in the Decrease of Ultra-Active Pre-Elementary School Children’s Impulse Disorder of Kermanshah Township (in Rotational Disobedience and Disorder Parameters). Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5(1), 56-62.
• Zilinskiene, I. (2014). Use of GeoGebra in Primary math education: a theoretical approach, Lietuvos Mathematikos Rinkinys, 55, 73-78.
• Zilinskiene, I., & Demirbilek, M. (2015). Use of GeoGebra in Primary Math Education in Lithuania: An Exploratory Study from Teachers’ Perspective. Informatics in Education, 14(1), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2015.08

APA

Natalija, B., Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., & Milinković, D. (2020). Developing Primary School Students’ Formal Geometric Definitions Knowledge by Connecting Origami and Technology. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0569. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6266

Vancouver

Natalija B, Lavicza Z, Fenyvesi K, Milinković D. Developing Primary School Students’ Formal Geometric Definitions Knowledge by Connecting Origami and Technology. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(2):em0569. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6266

AMA

Natalija B, Lavicza Z, Fenyvesi K, Milinković D. Developing Primary School Students’ Formal Geometric Definitions Knowledge by Connecting Origami and Technology. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(2), em0569. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6266

Chicago

Natalija, Budinski, Zsolt Lavicza, Kristof Fenyvesi, and Dragica Milinković. "Developing Primary School Students’ Formal Geometric Definitions Knowledge by Connecting Origami and Technology". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 2 (2020): em0569. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6266

Harvard

Natalija, B., Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., and Milinković, D. (2020). Developing Primary School Students’ Formal Geometric Definitions Knowledge by Connecting Origami and Technology. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0569. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6266

MLA

Natalija, Budinski et al. "Developing Primary School Students’ Formal Geometric Definitions Knowledge by Connecting Origami and Technology". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020, em0569. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6266