International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Alfaro Víquez, H., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2020). What skills and knowledge do university mathematics teacher education programs give future teachers in Costa Rica? European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9553
• Alfaro, A. L., Alpízar, M., Morales, Y., Ramírez, M., & Salas, O. (2013). La formación inicial y continua de docentes de matemáticas en Costa Rica [The initial and continuous training of mathematics teachers in Costa Rica]. Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática [Research and Training Notebooks in Mathematics Education], 2013, 131-179.
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Baumert J., & Kunter M. (2013) The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Mathematics teacher education, vol 8. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2
• Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012) Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: A review of the state of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0429-7
• Brese, F., & Tatoo, M. T. (Eds.). (2012). User guide for the TEDS-M International Database. Supplement 1: International Version of the TEDS-M Questionnaires. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
• Carrillo, J. (2011). Building mathematical knowledge in teaching by means of theorised tools. In T. Rowland, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_16
• Carrillo-Yañez, J., Climent, N., Montes, M., Contreras, L., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar-González, A., Ribeiro, M., & Muñoz-Catalán, M.C. (2018). The mathematics teacher’s specialised knowledge (MTSK) model. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981
• Chaves, E. (2003). Debilidades en los programas que forman docentes en educación matemática percepción de los actores [Weaknesses in the programs that train teachers in mathematics education perception of the actors]. Uniciencia [Uniscience], 20(1), 89-103.
• Demir, E., Ozturk, T., & Guven, B. (2018). Examining pre-service mathematics teachers’ reasoning errors, deficiencies and gaps in the proof process. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9522
• Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM, 44(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0432-z
• Hill, H., Ball, D., & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
• Hoover, M., Mosvold, R., Ball, D. L., & Lai, Y. (2016). Making progress on mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1363
• Hsieh, F. J., Chu, C. T., Hsieh, C. J., & Lin, P. J. (2014) In-depth analyses of different countries’ responses to MCK items: A view on the differences within and between east and west. In S. Blömeke, F. J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser, & W. Schmidt (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn. Advances in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_6
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
• Kaarstein, H. (2014). A comparison of three frameworks for measuring knowledge for teaching mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 23-52.
• Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., Koenig, J., Busse, A., Doehrmann, M., & Hoth, J. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8
• Kilpatrick, J., Blume, G., Heid, K., Wilson, J., Wilson, P., & Zbiek, M. (2015). Mathematical understanding for secondary teaching: A framework. In M. Heid, P. Wilson, & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Mathematical understanding for secondary teaching: A framework and clasroom based situations (pp. 9-30). IAP.
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
• Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., & Neubrand, M. (2013). Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers results from the COACTIV project. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5
• Maarouf, H. (2019). Pragmatism as a supportive paradigm for the mixed research approach: Conceptualizing the ontological, epistemological, and axiological stances of pragmatism. International Business Research, 12(9), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n9p1
• Ministerio de Educación Pública [Ministry of Public Education] [MEP]. (2011). Factores asociados al rendimiento en la prueba para docentes de matemática (No.2) [Factors associated with test performance for mathematics teachers (No. 2)]. Ministry of Public Education.
• Ministerio de Educación Pública [Ministry of Public Education] [MEP]. (2012). Programas de estudio de matemáticas. I, II, y III ciclos de la educación general básica y ciclo diversificado [Mathematics study programs. I, II, and III cycles of basic general education and diversified cycle]. Ministry of Public Education.
• Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828678
• Potari, D., & da Ponte, J. P. (2017). Current research on prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge. In The mathematics education of prospective secondary teachers around the World. ICME-13 topical surveys (pp. 3-15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38965-3_2
• Programa Estado de la Nación [State of the Nation Program] [PEN]. (2019). Resumen séptimo informe estado de la educación [Summary of the seventh report on the state of education]. State of the Nation Program.
• Román, I., & Lentini, V. (2018). Costa Rica: El estado de políticas públicas docentes. Diálogo Interamericano y unidos por la educación [Costa Rica: The state of public teacher policies. Inter-American dialogue and united for education]. https://www.thedialogue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/El-estado-de-politicas-publicas-abril-15.pdf
• Schmidt, W. H., Tatto, M. T., Bankov, K., Blömeke, S., Cedillo, T., Cogan, L., Han, I.S., Houang, R., Hsieh, F. J., Paine, L., Santillan, M., & Schwille, J. (2007). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. MT21 report, 32(12), 53-85. Michigan State University.
• Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press, Inc.
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
• Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
• Thompson, T. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in Bloom’s taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/221

APA

Alfaro Víquez, H. (2022). Costa Rican Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Teach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11712

Vancouver

Alfaro Víquez H. Costa Rican Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Teach. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2022;17(2):em0676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11712

AMA

Alfaro Víquez H. Costa Rican Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Teach. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2022;17(2), em0676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11712

Chicago

Alfaro Víquez, Helen. "Costa Rican Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Teach". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2022 17 no. 2 (2022): em0676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11712

Harvard

Alfaro Víquez, H. (2022). Costa Rican Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Teach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11712

MLA

Alfaro Víquez, Helen "Costa Rican Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Teach". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 17, no. 2, 2022, em0676. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11712