“Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching

Julie Nurnberger-Haag; Rashmi Singh; Jamie L. W. Wernet; Anita N. Alexander

doi:10.29333/iejme/10941

Full Text (PDF)

Julie Nurnberger-Haag ¹ ^* , Rashmi Singh ² , Jamie L. W. Wernet ³, Anita N. Alexander ⁴

More Detail

¹ Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA² Boston University, Boston, MA, USA³ Lansing Christian School, Lansing, MI, USA⁴ University of Bilkent, Ankara, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Some goals of mathematics teacher education include ensuring that pre-service teachers (PSTs) have strong content knowledge, the skill to anticipate and interpret student thinking, the ability to plan how to respond, and the ability to critically select resources for instruction. These goals are especially challenging for the topic of geometric shapes. Thus, we share an instructional activity that focuses PSTs’ attention on an inaccurate resource of geometric information, children’s books, to accomplish these goals in mathematics content as well as methods courses. Analyses of surveys and content assessments conducted to assess efficacy of the Shape Book Critique Activity were interpreted with the Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) framework. Based on the findings we suggest that this short 40-minute activity is a promising way to promote PSTs’ growth in three aspects of MKT for geometric shapes.

Keywords

geometry
pre-service teacher
mathematical knowledge for teaching
teacher education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 16, Issue 3, October 2021, Article No: em0642

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941

Publication date: 28 May 2021

Article Views: 3529

Article Downloads: 1672

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

The Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/framework1.pdf
Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for Preparing Teachers of Mathematics. https://amte.net/standards
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1991). LOGO Geometry. Silver Burdett Company.
Burger, W., & Shaughnessy, J. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/749317
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1991). LOGO Geometry. Silver Burdett Ginn.
Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M. A. Z., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children’s concepts of shape. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 192-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/749610
Cockcroft, W. H., & Marshall, J. (1999). Educating Hannah: It’s a what? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 326-330. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.5.6.0326
Common Core State Standards. (2010, 2015). Common Core Standards. Initiative. http://www.corestandards.org/
DePaolo, C. A., & Wilkinson, K. (2014). Get your head into the clouds: Using word clouds for analyzing qualitative assessment data. TechTrends, 58(3), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0750-9
de Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11-18. https://flm-journal.org/Articles/58360C6934555B2AC78983AE5FE21.pdf
Flevares, L. M., & Schiff, J. R. (2014). Learning mathematics in two dimensions: A review and look ahead at teaching and learning early childhood mathematics with children’s literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00459
Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2007). Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: Towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520167
Fujita, T. (2012). Learners’ level of understanding of the inclusion relations of quadrilaterals and prototype phenomenon. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.08.003
Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph, 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/749957
Halat, E. (2008a). Pre-service elementary school and secondary mathematics teachers’ van Hiele levels and gender differences. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1. http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/1.contentknowledge/halat01/article.pdf
Halat, E. (2008b). In-service middle and high school mathematics teachers: Geometric reasoning stages and gender. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 8-14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ841566.pdf
Harper, N. W., & Daane, C. J. (1998). Causes and reduction of math anxiety in preservice elementary teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 19(4), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1998.10462889
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372-400. https://pubs.nctm.org/view/journals/jrme/39/4/article-p372.xml
Kutluca, T. (2013) The effect of geometry instruction with dynamic geometric software; GeoGebra on Van Hiele geometry understanding levels of students. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(17), 1509-1518. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1554
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910903400406
Luneta, K. (2014). Foundation phase teachers’ (limited) knowledge of geometry. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 4(3), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v4i3.228
Marchis, I. (2012). Preservice primary school teachers’ elementary geometry knowledge. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2), 33-40. http://adn.teaching.ro/
Millsaps, G. (2013). Challenging preservice elementary teachers’ image of rectangles. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 2(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.2.1.0027
Nesmith, S., & Cooper, S. (2010). Trade books in the mathematics classroom: The impact of many, varied perspectives on determinations of quality. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 24(4), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2010.510086
Novak, E., & Tassell, J.L. (2017). Studying preservice teacher math anxiety and mathematics performance in geometry, word, and non-word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.005
Nurnberger-Haag, J. (2017). A cautionary tale: How children’s books (Mis)teach shapes. Early Education and Development, 28(4), 415-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1242993
Nurnberger-Haag, J. (2018). Follow the signs to promote accurate geometric shape knowledge: Together We can break the cycle of misinformation. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 80. https://library.osu.edu/ojs/index.php/OJSM/article/view/6041
Nurnberger-Haag, J., Alexander, A. N., & Powell, S. R. (2021). What counts in number books? A content-domain specific typology to evaluate children’s books for mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1777365
Nurnberger-Haag, J., Holford, T.L, Bryk, K.M., Strozyk, H., Harder, M., & Davidsaver, K (2019). A ball is not a circle: How to spot mathematical inaccuracies to improve and use shape book collections. Teacher Librarian, 1(47), 8-13.
Ozdemir Erdogan, E., & Dur, Z. (2014). Preservice mathematics teachers’ personal figural concepts and classifications about quadrilaterals. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 8. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.1
Pickreign, J. (2007). Rectangles and rhombi: How well do preservice teachers know them? Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1. http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/1.contentknowledge/pickreign01/article.pdf
Pytlak, M., & Swoboda, E. (2017). The impact of the prototypical images on the formal understanding of geometric concepts. Didactica Mathematicae, 39, 71-100.
Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Rech, J., Hartzell, J., & Stephens, L. (1993). Comparisons of mathematical competencies and attitudes of elementary education majors with established norms of a general college population. School Science and Mathematics, 93(3), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.11 11/ j.1949-8594. 1993.tb1221 2.x
Roberts, S. K. (2007). Watch what you say. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(5), 296-301. https://www.nctm.org/Publications/teaching-children-mathematics/2007/Vol14/Issue5/Watch-What-You-Say/
Schifter, D. (1999). Learning geometry: Some insights drawn from teacher writing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 360-367. https://pubs.nctm.org/view/journals/tcm/5/6/article-p360.xml
Sunzuma, G., & Maharaj, A. (2019). In-service teachers’ geometry content knowledge: Implications for how geometry is taught in teacher training institutions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14. 633-646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5776
Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., & Tabach, M. (2015). Early-years teachers’ concept images and concept definitions: Triangles, circles, and cylinders. ZDM, 47(3), 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0641-8
Turnuklu, E., Gundogdu Alayli, F., & Akkas, E. N. (2013). Investigation of prospective primary mathematics teachers’ perceptions and images for quadrilaterals. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1225-1232. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017328.pdf
van der Sandt, S., & Nieuwoudt, H. D. (2003). Grade 7 teachers’ and prospective teachers’ content knowledge of geometry. South African Journal of Education, 23(3), 199-205. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/24934
van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310-316. https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Teaching-Children-Mathematics/1999/Vol5/Issue6/Developing-Geometric-Thinking-through-Activities-That-Begin-with-Play/
Yilmaz Genc, M. M., Akinci Cosgun, A., & Pala, S. (2017). A study of mathematical content provided in illustrated children’s books. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 69, 159-175. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.69.9

How to cite this article

APA

Nurnberger-Haag, J., Singh, R., Wernet, J. L. W., & Alexander, A. N. (2021). “Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941

Vancouver

Nurnberger-Haag J, Singh R, Wernet JLW, Alexander AN. “Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(3):em0642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941

AMA

Nurnberger-Haag J, Singh R, Wernet JLW, Alexander AN. “Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(3), em0642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941

Chicago

Nurnberger-Haag, Julie, Rashmi Singh, Jamie L. W. Wernet, and Anita N. Alexander. "“Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2021 16 no. 3 (2021): em0642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941

Harvard

Nurnberger-Haag, J., Singh, R., Wernet, J. L. W., and Alexander, A. N. (2021). “Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941

MLA

Nurnberger-Haag, Julie et al. "“Books I Used as a Child were Mathematically Incorrect”: Reasons to Use Children’s Shape-Related Books as a Resource to Improve Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 16, no. 3, 2021, em0642. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10941