International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Altun, M. (2020). Mathematical literacy handbook. Aktuel Publishers.
• Altun, M., & Bozkurt, I. (2017). A new classification proposal for mathematical literacy problems. Education & Science, 42(190), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6916
• Aydin, H. (2014). Exploration of candidate mathematics teachers’ problem posing and problem solving skills from real life situations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
• Bao, J. (2004). A comparative study on composite difficulty between new and old Chinese mathematics textbooks. In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics (pp. 208-227). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812562241_0008
• Bonotto, C. (2013). Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9441-7
• Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD Education Working Papers, No.71, OECD Publishing.
• Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (1990). The art of problem posing. Erlbaum.
• Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 21, 401-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00142-6
• Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2003). A perspective for examining the link between problem posing and problem solving. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 103-110.
• Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
• Cakir, I. (2009). The evaluation of the fifth grade mathematics textbooks of the primary education according to the views of the teachers and students [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Cukurova University.
• Canbazoglu, H. B., & Tarim, K. (2021). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematik okuryazarlığı problemi kurma becerileri ve matematik etkinliği geliştirme süreçleri [Mathematical literacy problem posing skills and mathematical activity development processes of primary school teacher candidates]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [Journal of National Education], 50(231), 147-172. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.743434
• Chapman, O. (2012). Prospective elementary school teachers’ ways of making sense of mathematical problem posing. PNA, 6(4), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v6i4.6137
• Chen, L., Van Dooren, W., Chen, Q., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). An investigation on Chinese teachers’ realistic problem posing and problem solving ability and beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 919-948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9259-7
• Dede, Y., & Yaman, S. (2005). Examination of primary 6th, 7th and 8th grade mathematics and science textbooks: In terms of problem posing and solving tasks [Paper presentation]. XVI. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi [XVI. Educational Sciences Congress], Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
• Demir, F., & Altun, M. (2018). Development of mathematical literacy question writing process and skills. Education and Science, 43(194), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7111
• Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. Simon & Schuster.
• Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children’s made-up mathematics problems—A new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305073
• Ellerton, N. F. (2013). Engaging pre-service middle-school teacher-education students in mathematical problem posing: Development of an active learning framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9449-z
• Ellerton, N. F., & Clarkson, P. C. (1996). Language factors in mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Bishop, K, Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 987-1033). Springer.
• English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 183-217. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002963618035
• English, L. D. (1998). Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.29.1.0083
• Frankenstein, M. (2009). Developing a critical mathematical numeracy through real real-life word problems. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 111-130). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909383_008
• Gatabi, A. R., Stacey, K., & Gooya, Z. (2012). Investigating grade nine textbook problems for characteristics related to mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(4), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0052-5
• Gellert, U. (2004). Didactic material confronted with the concept of mathematical literacy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017693.32454.01
• Gonzales, N. A. (1996). Problem formulation: Insights from student generated questions. School Science and Mathematics, 96(3), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15830.x
• Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1-3), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
• Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2009). Introduction. Making sense of word problems: Past, present, and future. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. xi-xxvii). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909383
• Grundmeier, T. A. (2015). Developing the problem-posing abilities of prospective elementary and middle school teachers. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing (pp. 411-431). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_20
• Guven, B., Aydin-Guc, F., & Ozmen, Z. M. (2016). Problem types used in math lessons: The relationship between student achievement and teacher preferences. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(6), 863-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1136438
• Hošpesová, A., & Tichá, M. (2015). Problem posing in primary school teacher training. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing (pp. 433-447). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_21
• Iskenderoglu, T. A., & Baki, A. (2011). Classification of the questions in an 8th grade mathematics textbook with respect to the competency levels of PISA. Education & Science, 36(161), 287-300.
• Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick., & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75-102). Springer.
• Kerekes, J., Diglio, M., & King, K. P. (2009). How can teachers enable students to pose and solve problems using contexts within and outside mathematics? International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 5(2), 5-10.
• Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 123-147). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Kulm, G. (1994) Mathematics assessment: What works in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.
• Lavy, I., & Bershadsky, I. (2003). Problem posing via “what if not?” strategy in solid geometry—A case study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.007
• Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217299
• Lowrie, T. (2002). Designing a framework for problem posing: Young children generating open-ended tasks. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(3), 354-364. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2002.3.3.4
• Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527890
• Mayer, R. E., Lewis, A. B., & Hegarty, M. (1992). Mathematical misunderstandings: Qualitative reasoning about quantitative problems. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 137-154). Else. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60886-9
• McCrone, S. S., & Dossey, J. A. (2007). Mathematical literacy–it’s become fundamental. Principal Leadership, 7(5), 32-37.
• MEB. (2017). Middle school mathematics (5, 6, 7, & 8^th grade) curriculum. Ministry of Education.
• Monaghan, J. (2007). Linking school mathematics to out-of-school mathematical activities: Student interpretation of task, understandings and goals. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/175
• Mosher, C. A. (2015). Curriculum redesign with an emphasis on mathematical literacy in an 8th grade function unit [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The College at Brockport: State University of New York, New York.
• NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Nesher, P. (1980). The stereotyped nature of school word problems. For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 41-48.
• Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5423-y
• Nicol, C., & Bragg, L. (2009). Designing problems: What kinds of open-ended problems do preservice teachers pose? In Proceedings of the 33^rd Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 225-232).
• OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills. A new framework for assessment. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework–mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy. A framework for PISA 2006. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework. Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework. Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.
• Osana, H. P., & Pelczer, I. (2015). A review on problem posing in teacher education. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing (pp. 469-492). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_23
• Ozgen, K. (2019). Problem-posing skills for mathematical literacy: The sample of teachers and pre-service teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(84), 179-212. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.84.9
• Ozmen, Z. M., Taskin, D., & Guven, B. (2012). Determining the types of problems used by 7th grade math teachers. Education and Science, 37(165), 246-261.
• Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it? Princeton University Press.
• Prestage, S., & Perks, P. (2007). Developing teacher knowledge using a tool for creating tasks for the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9049-5
• Sahin, O., & Basgul, M. (2018). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının PISA problemi kurma becerilerinin incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service mathematics teachers’ ability to pose PISA problems]. Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi [International Journal of Field Education], 4(2), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.32570/ijofe.483163
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 311-343). Harvard University Press.
• Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
• Silver, E. A. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Looking back, looking around, and looking ahead. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9477-3
• Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521-539. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.5.0521
• Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.12.3.0129
• Southwell, B. (1998). Problem solving through problem posing: The experience of two teacher education students. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times (pp. 524-531). MERGA.
• Stickles, P. R. (2011). An analysis of secondary and middle school teachers’ mathematical problem posing. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(2), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301
• Stoyanova, E. (2000). Empowering students’ problem solving via problem posing: The art of framing ‘good’ questions. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 56(1), 33-37.
• Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2009). Problem posing and development of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teacher training [Paper presentation]. CERME 6, Lyon, France.
• Van Harpen, X. Y., & Presmeg, N. C. (2013). An investigation of relationships between students’ mathematical problem-posing abilities and their mathematical content knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9456-0
• Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modeling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction, 4, 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90002-7
• Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195-229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_2
• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., Chen, L., & Stessens, K. (2009). The relationship between posing and solving division-with-remainder problems among Flemish upper elementary school children. In L. Verschaffel, B. Greer, W. Van Dooren & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 143-160). Sense Publishers.
• Xie, J., & Masingila, J. O. (2017). Examining interactions between problem posing and problem solving with prospective primary teachers: A case of using fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9760-9

APA

Kozakli Ulger, T., Bozkurt, I., & Altun, M. (2022). Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985

Vancouver

Kozakli Ulger T, Bozkurt I, Altun M. Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2022;17(3):em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985

AMA

Kozakli Ulger T, Bozkurt I, Altun M. Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2022;17(3), em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985

Chicago

Kozakli Ulger, Tugce, Isil Bozkurt, and Murat Altun. "Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2022 17 no. 3 (2022): em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985

Harvard

Kozakli Ulger, T., Bozkurt, I., and Altun, M. (2022). Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985

MLA

Kozakli Ulger, Tugce et al. "Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 17, no. 3, 2022, em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985