International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Andreyev, A.V. (2014). The effect of the permanent way construction on the cost of the service life under various climatic and operating conditions. Emperor Alexander I. St. Petersburg State Transport University Bulletin, 3 (40), 36-39.
• Andreyev, A.V., Beltyukov, V.P., & Sennikova, A.V. (2014). Improving the methods of predicting the development of residual deformations in the permanent way. Emperor Alexander I. St. Petersburg State Transport University Bulletin, 4 (41), 16-21.
• Bachmann, H., Lay, E., Huesmann, H. (2007). Requirements met by Advanced Railway Track Systems: Maintenance and Cost Effectiveness. Maintenance & Renewal, 23-28. July.
• Bigus, G.A., Daniyev, Yu.F., Bystrova, N.A., & Galkin, D.I. (2014). Diagnostics of technical devices. Monograph. M: N.E. Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 616 p.
• Bikbau, M.Ya. (ed.). (2010). A new technology of railroad construction. Technological and technical-economic evaluation. Moscow Institute of Materials Science and Efficient Technologies, 30 p.
• Chernyayeva, N.S. (2008). Permanent way – Moscow: Transport Book, 44 p.
• Cooper, M. (2011). Brazilian Railway Culture. (p. 332). Cambridge: Scholars Publishing.
• Esveld, C. (1996). Innovations In Railway Track. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Section of Roads & Railways, 10 p.
• Dieleman, L., Fumey, M., Robinet, A. et al. (eds.) (2008). Experimentation of a track section without ballast on the new line of EAST EUROPEAN TGV. 8th World Congress on Railway Research., I.1.4.1.3., 1-16. Korea, Seoul.
• Doskaliyeva, B.B., Orynbassarova, Y.D., Omarkhanovа, Zh.M., Karibaev, Y.S. & Baimukhametova, A.S. (2016). Development of the System of Investment Support of Projects in the Industrial - Innovative Development of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11 (12), 5109-5127.
• Gishvarov, A.S., & Timashev, S.A. (2012). Theoretical framework of the accelerated evaluation and prediction of the reliability of technical systems. Monograph. Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 184 p.
• GOST P 27.004-2009. (2010). Reliability in equipment. Failure models. Moscow.
• Huesemann, H. (2005). Way on the tiled founding. Railway Technical Review ,3, 13-19.
• Kaewunruen, S., Remennikov, A., & Aikawa, A., Sakai, H. (2014). Free vibrations of interspersed railway track systems in three-dimensional space. Acoustics Australia, 42 (1), 20-26.
• Kaewunruen, S., & Remennikov, A.M. (2010). Dynamic properties of railway track and its components: Recent finding and future research directions. Insight Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 52(1), 20-22.
• Khanina, T.V. (2014). The innovative policy in railway management. Modern Science: Relevant Problems and Solutions, 7, 26-27.
• Kolos, A.F., & Kozlov, I.S. (2013). Modern structures of the permanent way for the construction of high-speed railway lines. Research Results Bulletin, 1-2 (6-7), 16-21.
• Konarev, N.S. (ed.) (1994). Rail transport: Encyclopedia. Moscow: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 559 p.
• Lysyuk, V.S., Sazonov, V.N., & Bashkatova, L.V. (2003). Solid and reliable rail-tracks. M Moscow: Akademkniga, 589 p.
• Methodology “The Effect of Operative Factors on the Reliability Indicators in the Main Components of Railway Switches”. (2007). O+P 756/5. Railway Union Organization.
• Resource and risk management at life cycle stages and reliability analysis in rail automatic and telemechanic equipment: guide. (2012). Moscow: Russian Railways JSC, 168 p.
• Sultangazinov, S.K. (2008). The probabilities of monitored component failure. Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communication Bulletin, 2 (51),18-20.
• Sultangazinov, S.K. (2008). Modeling failures of permanent way components. K.I. Satpayev Kazakh National Research Technical University, 3 (66), 86-89.
• Voskresensky, I.V., Voskresenskaya, T.P., Nikolayeva, L.Yu. (2015). Modern approaches to creating transcontinental main lines from the perspective of interested countries. Siberian State Industrial University Bulletin, 2 (12), 38-41.

APA

Sultangazinov, S. K., Yessengarayev, B. S., Kainarbekov, A., Nauryzova, K. S., & Shagiachmetow, D. R. (2016). Working Capacity of Track Structure and Failure Simulation of its Components. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(8), 2995-3008.

Vancouver

Sultangazinov SK, Yessengarayev BS, Kainarbekov A, Nauryzova KS, Shagiachmetow DR. Working Capacity of Track Structure and Failure Simulation of its Components. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2016;11(8):2995-3008.

AMA

Sultangazinov SK, Yessengarayev BS, Kainarbekov A, Nauryzova KS, Shagiachmetow DR. Working Capacity of Track Structure and Failure Simulation of its Components. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2016;11(8), 2995-3008.

Chicago

Sultangazinov, Suleimen K., Bekture Sh. Yessengarayev, Assemkhan Kainarbekov, Kulzhamal Sh. Nauryzova, and Daniar R. Shagiachmetow. "Working Capacity of Track Structure and Failure Simulation of its Components". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 8 (2016): 2995-3008.

Harvard

Sultangazinov, S. K., Yessengarayev, B. S., Kainarbekov, A., Nauryzova, K. S., and Shagiachmetow, D. R. (2016). Working Capacity of Track Structure and Failure Simulation of its Components. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(8), pp. 2995-3008.

MLA

Sultangazinov, Suleimen K. et al. "Working Capacity of Track Structure and Failure Simulation of its Components". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 8, 2016, pp. 2995-3008.