Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training

Päivi Maria Portaankorva-Koivisto; Anu Tuulikki Laine; Maija Ahtee

doi:10.29333/iejme/9617

Full Text (PDF)

Päivi Maria Portaankorva-Koivisto ¹ ^* , Anu Tuulikki Laine ¹, Maija Ahtee ¹

More Detail

¹ University of Helsinki, FINLAND^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The use of open problem-solving tasks in mathematics education challenges teachers’ beliefs, knowledge and practices. This article examines the practices of two primary teachers and their 3rd to 5th grade classes during a three-year in-service teacher training project aiming to increase mathematical problem-solving in class. Three lesson videos and two interviews with each teacher were used to provide the data for this study. The results show how different teachers in terms of their beliefs, knowledge and practices during the problem-solving activities can produce mathematically different learning opportunities. Teacher Ann saw mathematics as too rigorous, and to combat this, gave her pupils a great deal of autonomy. Her pupils were encouraged to come up with creative solutions. Teacher Beate emphasized mathematical understanding. Her pupils were guided cognitively and they came up with mathematically elegant solutions. In teaching open problem-solving both autonomy and cognitive guidance are needed.

Keywords

mathematical problem-solving
primary teachers
teaching practices

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 16, Issue 1, January 2021, Article No: em0624

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617

Publication date: 20 Jan 2021

Article Views: 2378

Article Downloads: 1532

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2007). The role of attention in expert classroom practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9026-z
Anderson, J., White, P., & Sullivan, P. (2005). Using a schematic model to represent influences on, and relationships between, teachers’ problem-solving beliefs and practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217414
Applebaum, M., & Leikin, R. (2007). Teachers’ conceptions of mathematical challenge in school mathematics. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 9-16). Seoul: PME 2.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of teacher education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Understanding the development of teachers’ professional competencies as personally, situationally and socially determined. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 783-802). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402042.n45
Blömeke, S., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Suhl, U. (2016). The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.003
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Chapman, O. (2013). Mathematical-task knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9234-7
Chapman, O. (2015). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching problem solving. LUMAT, 3(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1049
Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9120-5
FNBE. (2014). Finnish National Board of Education, National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education
Harisman, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2019). Beliefs of junior high school teachers on learning process on mathematical problem solving. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 3, p. 032112). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032112
Haukoos, G.D., & Penick, J.E. (1987). Interaction effect of personality characteristics, classroom climate, and science achievement. Science Education, 71(5), 735-743. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710510
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American educational research journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
Hodgen, J. (2011). Knowing and identity: A situated theory of mathematics knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 27-42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_3
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hughes, P., Swars Auslander, S., Stinson, D. W., & Fortner, C. K. (2019). Elementary teachers’ mathematical beliefs and mathematics anxiety: How do they shape instructional practices? School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12329
Johnson, R., Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., & Leary, H. (2016). Teachers, tasks, and tensions: Lessons from a research-practice partnership. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2-3), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9338-3
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6
Krzywacki, H., Pehkonen, L., & Laine, A. (2016). Promoting mathematical thinking in Finnish mathematics education. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (Second revised edition, pp. 109-123). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-776-4_8
Kuntze, S. (2012). Pedagogical content beliefs: Global, content domain-related and situation-specific components. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9347-9
Kutaka, T. S., Ren, L., Smith, W. M., Beattie, H. L., Edwards, C. P., Green, J. L., Chernyavskiy, P., Stroup, W., & Lewis, W. J. (2018). Examining change in K-3 teachers’ mathematical knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs: the case of Primarily Math. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(2), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9355-x
Laine, A., Näveri, L., Ahtee, M., Pehkonen, E., & Hannula, M. S. (2018). Connections of Primary Teachers’ Actions and Pupils’ Solutions to an Open Problem. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 967-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9809-3
Lerman, S. (2002). Situating research on mathematics teachers’ beliefs and on change. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 233-243). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_14
Liljedahl, P. (2010). Noticing rapid and profound mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9151-y
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
Lui, A. M., & Bonner, S. M. (2016). Preservice and inservice teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and instructional planning in primary school mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.015
Margolis, J., Durbin, R., & Doring, A. (2017). The missing link in teacher professional development: student presence. Professional Development in Education, 43(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1146995
Nohda, N. (2000). Teaching by open-approach method in Japanese mathematics classroom. In T. Nakahara, & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24^th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 39-53). Hiroshima: PME.
OECD (2017). “How does PISA measure students’ ability to collaborate?”, PISA in Focus, No. 77, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f21387f6-en
Oppermann, E., Anders, Y., & Hachfeld, A. (2016). The influence of preschool teachers’ content knowledge and mathematical ability beliefs on their sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.004
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Pehkonen, E. (1997). Use of problem fields as a method for educational change. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Use of open-ended problems in mathematics classroom (pp. 73-84). University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education. Research Report 176.
Pehkonen, E. (2004). State-of-the-art in problem solving: Focus on open problems. In H. Rehlich, & B. Zimmermann (Eds.), ProMath Jena 2003, Problem Solving in Mathematics Education (pp. 93-111). Hildesheim: Verlag Franzbecker.
Pehkonen, E., & Ahtee, M. (2006). Levels of teachers' listening in working with open problems. In Problem solving in mathematics education: proceedings of the ProMath 6 Meeting, 8-11 September 2005 in Debrecen (pp. 63-74).
Pehkonen, E., & Portaankorva-Koivisto, P. (2015). Teacher Change via participation to a research project. In L. Sumpter (Ed.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XX: Proceedings of the MAVI-20 Conference September 29 - October 1, 2014, Falun, Sweden (pp. 163–172). (Kultur och lärande; Nro 2015:04). Falun: Högskolan Dalarna.
Pehkonen, E., Näveri, L., & Laine, A. (2013). On teaching problem solving in school mathematics. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(4), 9-23.
Polly, D., McGee, J. R., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K., & Johnson, S. (2013). The association between teachers’ beliefs, enacted practices, and student learning in mathematics. Mathematics Educator, 22(2), 11-30.
Saadati, F., Cerda, G., Giaconi, V., Reyes, C., & Felmer, P. (2019). Modeling Chilean mathematics teachers’ instructional beliefs on problem solving practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 1009-1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9897-8
Santagata, R., & Yeh, C. (2016). The role of perception, interpretation, and decision making in the development of beginning teachers’ competence. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(1), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0737-9
Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Wolfe, C. B., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Professional development in early mathematics: effects of an intervention based on learning trajectories on teachers’ practices. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(4), 29-55.
Sawada, T. (1997). Developing lesson plans. In J.P Becker, & S. Shimada (Eds.), The open-ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics (pp. 23-35). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Scheiner, T., Montes, M. A., Godino, J. D., Carrillo, J., & Pino-Fan, L. R. (2017). What Makes Mathematics Teacher Knowledge Specialized? Offering Alternative Views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9859-6
Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2015). Teacher interests, mastery goals, and self-efficacy as predictors of instructional practices and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.005
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Shahbari, J. A. (2017). Mathematical and Pedagogical Knowledge amongst First-and Second-Grade Inservice and Preservice Mathematics Teachers. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 45-65.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shulman. L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Siswono, T. Y., Kohar, A. W., Rosyidi, A. H., & Hartono, S. (2017). Primary school teachers’ beliefs and knowledge about mathematical problem-solving and their performance on problem-solving task. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(2), 126-131.
Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: a systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM, 48(1-2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0775-y
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Helping teachers learn to better incorporate student thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313-340.
Stipek, D., Givvin, K., Salmon, J., & MacGyvers, V. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00052-4
Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9038-8
Swars, S. L., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., Carothers, J., & Myers, K. (2018). The preparation experiences of elementary mathematics specialists: examining influences on beliefs, content knowledge, and teaching practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9354-y
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2
Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305892
Tzur, R. (2008). A researcher perplexity: Why do mathematical tasks undergo metamorphosis in teacher hands? In O. Figueras, J. L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 139-147). Morelia, Mexico: PME.
Viholainen, A., Asikainen, M., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2014). Mathematics student teachers’ epistemological beliefs about the nature of mathematics and the goals of mathematics teaching and learning in the beginning of their studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1028a
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among primary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9068-2
Wilson, M. S., & Cooney, T. J. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 127-147). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_8
Yeo, J. B. (2017). Development of a framework to characterise the openness of mathematical tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9675-9

How to cite this article

APA

Portaankorva-Koivisto, P. M., Laine, A. T., & Ahtee, M. (2021). Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), em0624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617

Vancouver

Portaankorva-Koivisto PM, Laine AT, Ahtee M. Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(1):em0624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617

AMA

Portaankorva-Koivisto PM, Laine AT, Ahtee M. Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(1), em0624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617

Chicago

Portaankorva-Koivisto, Päivi Maria, Anu Tuulikki Laine, and Maija Ahtee. "Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2021 16 no. 1 (2021): em0624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617

Harvard

Portaankorva-Koivisto, P. M., Laine, A. T., and Ahtee, M. (2021). Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(1), em0624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617

MLA

Portaankorva-Koivisto, Päivi Maria et al. "Two Primary Teachers Developing their Teaching Problem-solving during Three-year In-service Training". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2021, em0624. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9617