International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Ashrf, J. (2019). Experiences and impact: The voices of teachers on math education reform in Ontario, Canada. Glocal Education in Practice: Teaching, Researching, and Citizenship BCES Conference Books, 2019, Volume 17. Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society. Retrieved July 14, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596920.pdf
• Bagby, J., & Sulak, T. (2009). Strategies for promoting problem solving and transfer: A qualitative study. Montessori Life, 21(4), 38-42.
• Bagby, J., & Sulak, T. (2010). Connecting educational theory and Montessori practice. Montessori Life, 22(1), 8-9.
• Ball, D. L. (2002). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Relations between research and practice. Mathematics and Education Reform Newsletter, 14(3), 1-5.
• Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-456). Macmillan.
• Bărbieru, I. T. C. (2016). The role of the educator in a Montessori classroom. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education/Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 8(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/2016.0801.07
• Battey, D., & Franke, M. (2008). Transforming identities: Understanding teachers across professional development and classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 127-149.
• Beatty, B. (2011). The dilemma of scripted instruction: Comparing teacher autonomy, fidelity, and resistance in the Froebelian Kindergarten, Montessori, direct instruction, and success for all. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 395-430.
• Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2015). The evaluation of role-playing in the context of teaching climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x
• Blömeke, S. (2014). Framing the enterprise: Benefits and challenges of international studies on teacher knowledge and teacher beliefs--modeling missing links. In S. Blömeke, F. J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser & W. H. Schmidt (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn, Advances in mathematics education (pp. 1-10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_1
• Browne, E. (2005). Structural and pedagogic change in further and higher education: A case study approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770500037754
• Burton, L. D. (2003). The formal, the planned, and the learned curriculum in an elementary education course for mathematics: Three perspectives on course content [Paper presentation]. 2^nd Annual General Meeting of the American association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, Chicago, Illinois.
• Cañadas, M. C., Gómez, P., & Rico, L. (2013). Structure of primary mathematics teacher education programs in Spain. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9422-z
• Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1086/461846
• Chipangura, A., & Aldridge, J. (2017). Impact of multimedia on students’ perceptions of the learning environment in mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9224-7
• Christle, C. A. (2010). Montessori Schools. In T. Hunt, J. Carper, T. Lasley, & C. Raish (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational reform and dissent. Sage Publications.
• Clarke, D., Goos, M., & Morony, W. (2007). Problem solving and working mathematically: an Australian perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5), 475-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0045-0
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6^th ed.). Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
• Cossentino, J. (2005). Ritualizing expertise: A non-Montessorian view of the Montessori method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211-244. https://doi.org/10.1086/426838
• Cossentino, J. M. (2006). Big work: Goodness, vocation, and engagement in the Montessori method. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(1), 63-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00346.x
• Cossentino, J. M. (2009). Culture, craft, & coherence: The unexpected vitality of Montessori teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 520-527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109344593
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publication.
• Davenport, L. R. (2000). Elementary mathematics curricula as a tool for mathematics education reform: Challenges of implementation and implications for professional development. Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching (CDT) Paper Series, Education Development Center.
• Debs, M. C. (2019). Diverse parents, desirable schools: public Montessori in an era of school choice. Harvard Education Press.
• Diamond. & Lee. K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(4045), 959-64. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529
• Drake, C. (2006). Turning points: Using teachers’ mathematics life stories to understand the implementation of mathematics education reform. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(6), 579-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9021-9
• Eacott, S., & Holmes, K. (2010). Leading reform in mathematics education: Solving a complex equation. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 12(2), 84-97.
• Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Implementing a robotics curriculum in an early childhood Montessori classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 13, 153-169. https://doi.org/10.28945/2094
• Elkind, D. (2008). The power of play: Learning What Comes Naturally. American Journal of Play, 1(1), 1-6.
• Ellis, M., & Berry III, R. Q. (2005). The paradigm shift in mathematics education: Explanations and implications of reforming conceptions of teaching and learning. The Mathematics Educator, 15(1), 7-17.
• Ervin, B., Wash, P. D., & Mecca, M. E. (2010). A 3-year study of self-regulation in Montessori and non-Montessori classrooms. Montessori Life, 22(2), 22-31.
• Faryadi, Q. (2007). The Montessori paradigm of learning: So, what? Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496081.pdf
• Faryadi, Q. (2017). The application of Montessori method in learning mathematics: An experimental research. Open Access Library Journal, 4, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104140
• Franczak, I. (2016). Comparative analysis of behavioral engagement and transferable skills in conventional and Montessori schools. Proceedings of The National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2016 University of North Carolina, Asheville. April 7-9, 2016.
• Fritzlar, T. (2006). Sensitivity to complexity- an important prerequisite of problem-solving mathematics teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 38(6), 436-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652780
• Guerriero, S. (2014). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession. American Education Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180.
• Herrera, T. A., & Owens, D. T. (2001). The “new new math?”: Two reform movements in mathematics education. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_2
• Ingvarson, L., Schwille, J., Tattoo, T.M., Rowley, G., Peck, R., & Senk, S. L. (2013). An analysis of teacher education context, structure, and quality-assurance arrangements in TEDS-M countries: Findings from the IEA teacher education and development study in mathematics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://heefa.net/files/TEDS-M_Findings.pdf
• Jamilah, R. J. (2018). Predominantly Black institutions and public Montessori schools: Reclaiming the “genius” in African American children. Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2017-0007
• Kayili, G., & Ari, R. (2011). Examination of the effects of the Montessori method on preschool children’s readiness to primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 2104-2109.
• Kuennen, E. W., & Beam, J. E. (2020). Teaching the mathematics that teachers need to know: Classroom ideas for supporting prospective elementary teachers’ development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In A. Appova, R. M. Welder, & Z. Feldman, (Eds.), Supporting Mathematics Teacher Educators’ Knowledge and Practices for Teaching Content to Prospective (Grades K-8) Teachers. Special Issue: The Mathematics Enthusiast, ISSN 1551-3440, vol. 17, nos. 2 & 3, pp. 771-805.
• Kutaka, T. S., Smith, W. M., Albano, A. D., Edwards, C. P., Ren, L., Beattie, H. L., Lewis, W. J., Heaton, R. M., & Stroup, W. W. (2017). Connecting teacher professional development and student mathematics achievement: Mediating belonging with multimodal explorations in language, identity, and culture. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116687551
• Lang, M., & Namukasa, I. K. (2011). Problem solving as a pedagogical practice: Useful conceptions of professional learning. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(4), 1-12.
• Laski, E. V., Vasilyeva, M., & Schiffman, J. (2016). Longitudinal comparison of place-value and arithmetic knowledge in Montessori and non-Montessori students. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v2i1.5677
• Li, Q., & Ni, Y. J. (2011). Impact of curriculum reform: Evidence of change in classroom practice in the mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.06.003
• Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: the science behind the genius. Oxford University.
• Lillard, A. S. (2006). Dissociations, developmental psychology, and pedagogical design. Child Development, 77(6), 1563-1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00959.x
• Lillard, A. S. (2007). Montessori: The science behind the genius (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Lillard, A. S. (2011). What belongs in a Montessori primary classroom? Results from a survey of AMI and AMS teacher trainers. Montessori Life, 23(3), 18-32.
• Lillard, A. S. (2012). Preschool children’s development in classic Montessori, supplemented Montessori, and conventional programs. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 379-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.001
• Lillard, A. S. (2013). Playful learning and Montessori education. American Journal of Play, 5(2), 157-186.
• Lillard, A. S. (2018). Rethinking education: Montessori’s approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 395-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418769878
• Lillard, A. S. (2019). Educational Psychology Review, 31, 939-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-3
• Lillard, A. S., & Heise, M. J. (2016). Removing Supplementary materials from Montessori classrooms changed child outcomes. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v2i1.5678
• Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893-1894. Retrieved July 19, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362
• Litster, K., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Reeder, R. (2019). Base-10 Blocks: a study of iPad virtual manipulative affordances across primary-grade levels. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00257-2
• Livstrom, I. C., Szostkowski, A. H., & Roehrig, G. H. (2019). Integrated STEM in practice: Learning from Montessori philosophies and practices. School Science and Mathematics, 119(4), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12331
• Lopata, C., Wallace, N. V. & Finn, K. V. (2005). Comparison of academic achievement between Montessori and traditional education programs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540509594546
• Manouchehri, A., & Goodman, T. (1998). Mathematics curriculum reform and teachers: Understanding the connections. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597573
• Manouchehri, A., & Sipes, C. (1998). Transforming middle school mathematics through teacher empowerment. In L. Leutzinger, (Ed.), Mathematics in the Middle (pp. 35-40). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
• Mapolelo, D. C. & Akinsola, M. K. (2015). Preparation of mathematics teachers: Lessons from review of literature on teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and teacher education. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-4-18
• Marshall, C. (2017). Montessori education: A review of the evidence base. Science of Learning, 2(11), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2^nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Mix, K. S., Smith, L. B., Stockton, J., Cheng, Y., & Barterian, J. A. (2017). Grounding the symbols for place value: Evidence from training and long-term exposure to base-10 models. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(1), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2016.1180296
• Monroe, E. E. (1984). The development of a mathematics methods course from pre-service elementary teachers: Some considerations. Technical Report. Western Kentucky University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED244813.pdf
• Murano, D., Sawyer, J. E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2020). A meta-analytic review of preschool social and emotional learning interventions. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 227-263. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654320914743
• Namukasa, I. K. (2016). Teaching practices in the Montessori system. In Proceedings of the 13^th International Congress on Mathematics education, ICME-13, Hamburg, Germany.
• Namukasa, I. K. (2016, January). Mathematics for teachers in the Montessori system [Paper presentation]. The Fields Mathematics Institute, Toronto Ontario.
• NCTM (2012). Council of the accreditation of educator preparation (CAEP) standards for Mathematics Teacher Preparations. NCTM. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from http://caepnet.org/accreditation/caep-accreditation/spa-standards-and-report-forms/nctm
• Nisbet J., & Watt, J. (1994). Case study. In J. Bell, T. Bush, A. Fox, J. Goodey, & S. Goulding (Eds.), Conducting small-scale investigations in educational management (pp. 79-92). Harper & Row. Oxford University.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3^rd ed.). Sage.
• Peng, H.-H., & Md-Yunus, S. (2014). Do children in Montessori schools perform better in the achievement test? A Taiwanese perspective. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(2), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-014-0108-7
• Plake, B. S., & Parker, C. S. (1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 551-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448204200218
• Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In A. Gutierrez, & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 461-494). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_017
• Price, J. N., & Ball, D. L. (1997). There’s always another Agenda: Marshalling resources for mathematics reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(6), 637-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202797183810
• Raimondo, R. (2018). Cosmic education in Maria Montessori: Arts and sciences as resources for human development. Studi sulla Formazione, 21, 249-260.
• Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.1086/428885
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2^nd ed.). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(02)80276-0
• Rosanova, M. J. (2003). Montessori elementary is different: What children study, what children do. Montessori Life, 15(2), 8-10.
• Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (2002). Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993-2000. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 122-138.
• Ross, S., (2012). The Montessori method: The development of a healthy pattern of desire in early childhood. Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, 19(1), 87-122. https://doi.org/10.1353/ctn.2012.0004
• Rule, A. C., & Stewart, R. A. (2002). Effects of practical life materials on kindergarteners’ fine motor skills. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016533729704
• Ryniker, D. H., & Shoho, A. R. (2001). Student perceptions of their elementary classrooms: Montessori vs. traditional environments. Montessori Life, 13(1), 45-48.
• Saracho, O., & Spodek, B. (2009). Educating the young mathematician: A historical perspective through the nineteenth century. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0293-9
• Schneider, C. (2012). 5 Characteristics connecting Montessori education and the digital learning movement. Learning, Online and Blended. Retrieved January 9, 2020 from https://www.gettingsmart.com/2012/05/5-characteristics-connecting-montessori-ed-the-digital-learning-movement/
• Sewornoo, S. (2016). Assessment literacy of mathematics teachers and challenges in the implementation of the school-based assessment in senior high schools of Ghana (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). University of Education.
• Shiraz, M., & Qaiser, S. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and their practices towards collaborative learning in public and private schools: A comparative case study. Journal of Educational Research, 20(2), 95-112. Retrieved August 29,2019, from http://jer.iub.edu.pk/journals/JER-Vol-20.No-2/Complete_file_of_JER_20_(2).pdf
• Sztajn, P. (1995). Mathematics reform: Looking for insights from nineteenth century events. School scince and Mathematics, 95(7), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15805.x
• Tatto, M. T. (2013). The teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Technical Report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement.
• Tatto, M. T., & Senk, S. (2011). The mathematics education of future primary and secondary teachers: Methods and findings from the teacher education and development study in mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110391807
• Thayer-Bacon, B. (2012). Maria Montessori, John Dewey, and William H. Kilpatrick. Education and Culture, 28(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2012.0001
• Toran, M. (2011). Montessori yönteminin çocukların kavram edinimi, sosyal uyumları ve küçük kas motor becerileri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effect of the Montessori method on children's concept acquisition, social adaptation and small muscle motor skills] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
• Wang, T., & Tang, S. (2013). Profiles of opportunities to learn for TEDS-M future secondary mathematics teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 847-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9421-0
• White, A. L., Way, J., Perry, B., Southwell, B. (2006). Mathematical attitudes, beliefs, and achievement in primary pre-service mathematics teacher education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 7, 33-52.
• Whitescarver, K., & Cossentino, J. (2008). Montessori and the mainstream: A century of reform on the margins. Teachers College Record, 110, 2571-2600.

APA

Namukasa, I. K., & Aryee, K. L. (2021). Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005

Vancouver

Namukasa IK, Aryee KL. Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(3):em0646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005

AMA

Namukasa IK, Aryee KL. Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(3), em0646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005

Chicago

Namukasa, Immaculate Kizito, and Kinful Lartebea Aryee. "Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2021 16 no. 3 (2021): em0646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005

Harvard

Namukasa, I. K., and Aryee, K. L. (2021). Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005

MLA

Namukasa, Immaculate Kizito et al. "Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 16, no. 3, 2021, em0646. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005