International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Alghadari, F. (2016). Pemecahan Masalah Spasial Matematis Calon Guru Matematika Ditinjau dari Langkah-langkah Pemecahan Masalah Polya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 16(3), 226-234.
• Alghadari, F., & Herman, T. (2018). The obstacles of geometric problem-solving on solid with vector and triangle approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012046
• Alghadari, F., Turmudi, T., & Herman, T. (2018). The application of vector concepts on two skew lines. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012030
• Ardika, I. W. D., Sitawati, A. A. R., & Suciani, N. K. (2013). Fenomena Pokok Pendidikan Indonesia: Apa dan Bagaimana? Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(1), 96-107.
• Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning to Teach (10th ed.; P. Braffman, Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Aurah, C., Cassady, J. C., & McConnell, T. (2014). Predicting Problem Solving Ability from Metacognition and Self-Efficacy Beliefs on a Cross Validated Sample. British Journal of Education, 2(1), 49-70.
• Bhowmick, S., Young, J. A., Clark, P. W., & Bhowmick, N. (2017). Marketing Students’ Mathematics Performance: The Mediating Role of Math Anxiety on Math Self-Concept and Math Self-Efficacy. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 17(9), 104-117. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v17i9.1426
• Buckley, J., Seery, N., & Canty, D. (2019). Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3
• Cetin, S. Y., Erel, S., & Ozalp, O. (2018). Assessment of problem solving proficiencies with self-efficacy perceptions of students in faculty of health sciences of cyprus international university. SHS Web of Conferences, 48(1), 01025. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184801025
• Chang, Y. L. (2015). Examining relationships among elementary mathematics teachers’ efficacy and their students’ mathematics self-efficacy and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1307-1320. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1387a
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and Teaching Early Math. New York: Routledge.
• Collins, J. S., Usher, E. L., & Butz, A. (2015). Examining Students’ Perceived Autonomy Support as a Source of Self-Efficacy in Mathematics. Poster Session Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, 1.
• Dindyal, J. (2015). Geometry in the early years: a commentary. ZDM, 47(3), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0700-9
• Dossey, J. A. (2017). Problem Solving from a Mathematical Standpoint. In C. Benő & F. Joachim (Eds.), Educational Research and Innovation: The Nature of Problem Solving Using Research to Inspire 21st Century Learning: Using Research to Inspire 21st Century Learning (pp. 59-72). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-en
• Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. UK: Routledge.
• Fan, L., Mailizar, M., Alafaleq, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). A Comparative Study on the Presentation of Geometric Proof in Secondary Mathematics Textbooks in China, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia. 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_3
• Goos, M., Stillman, G., & Vale, C. (2017). Teaching secondary School Mathematics: Research and Practice for the 21st Century. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
• Grigg, S., Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., & Svetleff, Z. (2018). Relations among math self efficacy, interest, intentions, and achievement: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.007
• Hathaway, D., & Norton, P. (2018). Understanding Problems of Practice A Case Study in Design Research (J. Spector, M. Bishop, & D. Ifenthaler, Eds.). USA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77559-3
• Herbst, P., Fujita, T., Halverscheid, S., & Weiss, M. (2017). The Learning and Teaching of Geometry in Secondary Schools: A Modeling Perspective. New York NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98767-5_13
• Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Hudson, L. (2018). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
• Lishinski, A., Yadav, A., Good, J., & Enbody, R. (2016). Learning to program: Gender differences and interactive effects of students’ motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance. ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960329
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Prawoto, N., & Basuki, A. T. (2016). Model Analisis Komposisi Pengeluaran Publik terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dalam Mendukung Good Governance: Studi Empiris Kabupaten Kota di Indonesia Tahun 2011- 2014. Buletin Ekonomi, 14(2), 177-192.
• Rahayu, T., & Alghadari, F. (2019). Identitas Bayangan Konsep Limas : Analisis Terhadap Konsepsi Matematis Siswa. Inomatika: Jurnal Inovasi Matematika, 1(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v1i1.134
• Romey, W. D. (1970). What is your creativity quotient?. School Science and Mathematics, 70(1), 3-8.
• Rosilawati, & Alghadari, F. (2018). Konsepsi siswa pada suatu bentuk bangun ruang terkait dengan rusuk dan diagonal sisi. Prisma: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v7i2.459
• Schunk, D. H., & Dibenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-Efficacy Theory in Education. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 34-54). UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773384.ch3
• Setiadi, D. R., Suryadi, D., & Mulyana, E. (2017). Didactical Design Enrichment of Angle in Geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012060
• Silk, K. J., & Parrott, R. L. (2014). Math anxiety and exposure to statistics in messages about genetically modified foods: Effects of numeracy, math self-efficacy, and form of presentation. Journal of Health Communication, 19(7), 838-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.837549
• Sinclair, N., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(5), 691-719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6
• Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.06.008
• Street, K. E. S., Malmberg, L. E., & Stylianides, G. J. (2017). Level, strength, and facet-specific self-efficacy in mathematics test performance. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(3), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0833-0
• Sumarna, N., Wahyudin, W., & Herman, T. (2017). The Increase of Critical Thinking Skills through Mathematical Investigation Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012067
• Wieber, A. E., Evoy, K., McLaughlin, T. F., Derby, K. M., Kellogg, E., Williams, R. L., … Rinaldi, L. (2017). The effects of a modified direct instruction procedure on time telling for a third grade student with learning disabilities with a brief comparison of interesting and boring formats. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(2), 239-248.
• Xu, Z., & Jang, E. E. (2017). The role of math self-efficacy in the structural model of extracurricular technology-related activities and junior elementary school students’ mathematics ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.063
• Yeo, J. B. . (2013). The Nature and Development of Processes in Mathematical Investigation. Nanyang Technological University.
• Yeo, J. B. W. (2017). Specialising and conjecturing in mathematical investigation. 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 337-344.
• Zhang, C. (2017a). An Inquiry into Student Math Self-Efficacy, As Told from the Perspective of Ontario Secondary Teachers. University of Toronto.
• Zhang, D. (2017b). Effects of visual working memory training and direct instruction on geometry problem solving in students with geometry difficulties. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 117-138.

APA

Alghadari, F., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234

Vancouver

Alghadari F, Herman T, Prabawanto S. Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3):em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234

AMA

Alghadari F, Herman T, Prabawanto S. Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3), em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234

Chicago

Alghadari, Fiki, Tatang Herman, and Sufyani Prabawanto. "Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 3 (2020): em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234

Harvard

Alghadari, F., Herman, T., and Prabawanto, S. (2020). Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234

MLA

Alghadari, Fiki et al. "Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234