Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study

Dalal H. Alfageh; Cindy S. York; Angie Hodge-Zickerman; Ying Xie

doi:10.29333/iejme/14190

Full Text (PDF)

Dalal H. Alfageh ¹ , Cindy S. York ² ^* , Angie Hodge-Zickerman ³ , Ying Xie ²

More Detail

¹ King Saud University, Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA² Northern Illinois University, Chicago, IL, USA³ Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This case study examined teachers’ perceptions and use of adaptive diagnostic assessment for improving teaching and learning of elementary-level mathematics. The purpose was to understand how the teaching and learning of mathematics occurred in the classroom and changes that transpired due to the implementation of diagnostic assessments. Findings illustrate that diagnostic assessment can be a critical tool for improving pedagogical practice by enhancing mathematics teaching and learning by creating groups of students, planning lesson time, focused pedagogy, giving student feedback, communicating with stakeholders, and improving teacher efficiency. Participants demonstrated satisfaction with the benefits offered by diagnostic assessment for improving mathematics teaching and learning. Participants described challenges that hindered their effective use of diagnostic assessment tools. The findings of this study support a case for the adoption of diagnostic assessments to improve pedagogical practice and promote mathematics learning among elementary-level students.

Keywords

adaptive diagnostic assessment
mathematics
teachers

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 19, Issue 1, February 2024, Article No: em0768

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190

Publication date: 10 Feb 2024

Article Views: 1416

Article Downloads: 833

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alexander, M., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Forbush, D. (2007). Online mathematics methods course evaluation: Student outcomes, generalization, and pupil performance. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(4), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640703000401
Alfageh, D. H. (2021). Examining teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning improve mathematics teaching and learning [Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University].
Alfageh, D. H., & York, C. S. (2021). A case study: Examining teachers’ perceptions regarding the use of diagnostic assessment in mathematics classroom [Paper presentation]. Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference.
Allal, L., & Lopez, M. L. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241-265). OECD.
Amirshokoohi, A., & Wisniewski, D. P. (2018). Constructing understanding in a mathematics methods course. Teaching Children Mathematics, 24(7) 442-451. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.24.7.0442
Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4
Bacak, J., Wagner, J., Martin, F., Byker, E., Wang, W., & Alhgrim-Delzell, L. (2023). Examining technologies used in K-12 school districts: A proposed framework for classifying educational technologies. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(3), 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231155605
Black, P., & William, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative, 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
Bohlmann, C. A., & Fletcher, L. (2008). Diagnostic assessment for mathematics in a distance learning context. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(3), 556-574. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v22i3.25802
Buyukkarci, K. (2014). Assessment beliefs and practices of language teachers in primary context. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 109-122.
Camacho, D. J., & Legare, J. M. (2021). Pivoting to online learning–The future of learning and work. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 6(1), e1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1239
Chang, H. H. (2015). Psychometrics behind computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 80(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9401-5
Chapelle, C. A., Cotos, E., & Lee, J. (2015). Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing, 32(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214565386
Cherif, A. H., Gialamas, S., & Stamati, A. (2017). Developing mathematical knowledge and skills through the awareness approach of teaching and learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(13), 108-132.
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
Clark, I. (2008). Assessment is for learning: Formative assessment and positive learning interactions. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 2(1), 1-16.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
De Marsico, M., Sterbini, A., & Temperini, M. (2013). A strategy to join adaptive and reputation-based social-collaborative e-learning, through the zone of proximal development. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 11(3), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdet.2013070102
Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(5), 825-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01176-4
Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.
Gierl, M. J., Wang, C., & Zhou, J. (2008). Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnostic inferences about examinees’ cognitive skills in algebra on the SAT©. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611186.009
Guzmán, E., & Conejo, R. (2015). Measuring misconceptions through item response theory. In C. Conati, N. Heffernan, A. Mitrovic, & M. Verdejo (Eds.), International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (vol. 9112, pp. 608–611). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_73
Hedegaard, M. (2005). The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 170-195). Routledge.
Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the education endowment foundation. Education Endowment Foundation. https://larrycuban.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/the_impact_of_digital_technologies_on_learning_full_report_2012.pdf
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
Hsu, P.-S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0014-3
Kane, M. T., & Bejar, I. I. (2014). Cognitive frameworks for assessment, teaching, and learning: A validity perspective. Psicología Educativa [Educational Psychology], 20(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.006
Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Yovanoff, P. (2009). Diagnostic assessments in mathematics to support instructional decision making. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(16), 16.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) (pp. 3-30). Routledge.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Leighton, J. P., & Gierl, M. J. (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611186
Li, Y., & Lappan, G. (2014). Mathematics curriculum in school education: Advancing research and practice from an international perspective. In Y. Li, & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education: Advances in mathematics education (pp. 3-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007–Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2214-2226). AACE.
NASEM. (2020). Changing expectations for the K-12 teacher workforce: Policies, preservice education, professional development, and the workplace. National Academies Press.
Navarro, J. I., Aguilar, M., Marchena, E., Ruiz, G., Menacho, I., & Van Luit, J. E. (2012). Longitudinal study of low and high achievers in early mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02043.x
Nichols, P. (1994). A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessments. Review of Educational Research, 64, 575-603. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004575
Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4-24.
Nikolov, M. (2016). A framework for young EFL learners’ diagnostic assessment: ‘Can do statements’ and task types. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 65-92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_4
Ozudogru, M., & Ozudogru, F. (2019). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers and the effect of demographic variables. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512515
Roberts, M. R., & Gierl, M. J. (2010). Developing score reports for cognitive diagnostic assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(3), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00181.x
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
Schuck, S. (2016). Enhancing teacher education in primary mathematics with mobile technologies. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.8
Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
Shim, G. T. G., Abang Shakawi, A. M. H., & Azizan, F. L. (2017). Relationship between students’ diagnostic assessment and achievement in a pre-university mathematics course. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4) 364-371. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p364
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Shute, V. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2014). Formative and stealth assessment. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 311-321). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_25
Shute, V. J., Graf, E. A., & Hansen, E. G. (2006). Designing adaptive, diagnostic math assessments for individuals with and without visual disabilities. ETS Research Report Series, 2006(1), i-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2006.tb02007.x
Tambunan, H. (2019). The effectiveness of the problem solving strategy and the scientific approach to students’ mathematical capabilities in high order thinking skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
Treagust, D. F. (2012). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention [Paper presentation]. The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education.
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Wallick, E. J. (2022). Put me in coach! I’m ready to play with technology: Examining the perspectives of instructional technology coaches in K-12 learning environments [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University Chicago].

How to cite this article

APA

Alfageh, D. H., York, C. S., Hodge-Zickerman, A., & Xie, Y. (2024). Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), em0768. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190

Vancouver

Alfageh DH, York CS, Hodge-Zickerman A, Xie Y. Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2024;19(1):em0768. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190

AMA

Alfageh DH, York CS, Hodge-Zickerman A, Xie Y. Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2024;19(1), em0768. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190

Chicago

Alfageh, Dalal H., Cindy S. York, Angie Hodge-Zickerman, and Ying Xie. "Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2024 19 no. 1 (2024): em0768. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190

Harvard

Alfageh, D. H., York, C. S., Hodge-Zickerman, A., and Xie, Y. (2024). Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), em0768. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190

MLA

Alfageh, Dalal H. et al. "Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 19, no. 1, 2024, em0768. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190