International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Artigue, M. (2009). Didactical Design in Mathematics Education. In C. Winsløw (Ed.), Nordic Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 7-16). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087907839_003
• Artigue, M., Haspekian, M., & Corblin-Lenfant, A. (2014). Introduction to the Theory of Didactical Situations (TDS). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education (pp. 97-113). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9
• Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://doi.org/10.2307/1421346
• Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Eds.). New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
• Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1735-0/12
• Byers, P. (2010). Investigating Trigonometric Representations in the Transition to College Mathematics. College Quarterly, 13(2), 10. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ930372.pdf
• Cetin, O. F. (2015). Students perceptions and development of conceptual understanding regarding trigonometry and trigonometric function. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(3), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2017
• Choi-koh, S. S. (2003). Effect of a graphing calculator on a 10th-grade student’s study of trigonometry. Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596619
• Corlis, J. J., & Berglund, W. V. (1958). Plane Trigonometry (second). Boston: The Riverside Press Cambridge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (P. A. Smith, Ed., 4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd Ed.). California: SAGE Publication, Inc.
• Demir, Ö., & Heck, A. (2013). A new learning trajectory for trigonometric functions. In E. Faggiano & A. Montono (Eds.), ICTMT11 (pp. 119-124). Bari: University of Bari. Retrieved from https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1802208/141597_A_new_learning_trajectory_for_trigonometric_functions.pdf
• Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 2, 571-581. https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2012.6249194
• Imsen, G. (1999). Reflection as a bridging concept between normative and descriptive approaches to didactics. TNTEE Publications, 2(1), 95-105. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Hudson5/publication/284365075_DidaktikFachdidaktik_as_the_Science-s_of_the_Teaching_Profession/links/56522cfb08ae1ef92975650d/Didaktik-Fachdidaktik-as-the-Science-s-of-the-Teaching-Profession.pdf
• Kagenyi, D. G. (2016). Pedagogical factors affecting the learning of trigonometry in secondary schools in gatundu north sub-county (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Kenyatta University, Kenya https://irlibrary.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/11349/Pedagogical%20factors%20affecting%20the%20learning%20of%20trigonometry%20in%20secondary........pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
• Kamber, D., & Takaci, D. (2017). On problematic aspects in learning trigonometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 5211(August), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1357846
• Kansanen, P. (2003). Studying the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and Learning: An attempt to a concentual whole of the teaching-Studying-learning process. Educational Studies, 29(2-3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690303279
• Kansanen, P., & Meri, M. (1999). The Didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. Didaktik/Fakchdidaktik as Science(-s) of the Teaching Profession?, 2(1), 107-116. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Hudson5/publication/284365075_DidaktikFachdidaktik_as_the_Science-s_of_the_Teaching_Profession/links/56522cfb08ae1ef92975650d/Didaktik-Fachdidaktik-as-the-Science-s-of-the-Teaching-Profession.pdf
• Maknun, C. L., Rosjanuardi, R., & Ikhwanudin, T. (2018). Students’ Mathematical Argumentation in Trigonometry. In 5th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences (pp. 689-696). Istanbul: Ocerint. Retrieved from http://www.ocerint.org/intcess18_e-publication/papers/154.pdf
• Maknun, C. L., Rosjanuardi, R., & Jupri, A. (2018). Lesson design on the relationship between radian and degree. In AIP Conference Proceeding 2014, 020031 (2018) (pp. 020031-1-020031-020038). Surakarta: AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054435
• Maknun, C. L., Rosjanuardi, R., & Jupri, A. (2019). From ratios of right triangle to unit circle: An introduction to trigonometric functions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022124
• Marchi, D. J. (2012). A Study of Student Understanding of the Sine Function through Representations and the Process and Object Perspectives (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Ohio State University, USA. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1343253667&disposition=inline
• Orhun, N. (2001). Student’s Mistakes and Misconceptions on Teaching of Trigonometry. Journal of Curriculum Studies, (1), 208-211. Retrieved from http://math.unipa.it/~grim/AOrhun.PDF
• Piaget, J. (1970). Generic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/piag91272
• Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design Tools in Didactical Research: Instrumenting the Epistemological and Cognitive Aspects of the Design of Teaching Sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09338513
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
• Spitzbart, A., & Bardell, R. H. (1955). College Algebra and Plane Trigonometry. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
• Sullivan, P., Knott, L., & Yang, U. (2015). The Relationships Between Task Design, Anticipated Pedagogies, and Student Learning. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task Design in Mathematics Education (pp. 83-114). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_3
• Suryadi, D. (2010). Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Pembentukan Karakter Bangsa [Research in Mathematics Education for Building National Character]. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, (November), 1-14. Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/10461/1/1Makalah%5CnUtama%5Cn-%5CnDidi%5CnSuryadi.pdf
• Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical Design Research (Ddr) Dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika [Didactical Design Research (DDR) in Mathematics Research Development]. In A. Nurjaman, R. Sariningsih, I. P. Sari, & G. Kadarisma (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp. 3-12). Bandung: stkip siliwangi.
• Suryadi, D. (2018). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR) (Januari) [Fundamental Philoshophy in Didactical Design Research]. Bandung.
• Torrance, H. (2010). Qualitative Research Methods in Education (1st Ed.). SAGE Publication Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446263174
• Usman, M. H., & Hussaini, M. M. (2017). Analysis of Students’ Error in Learning of Trigonometry Among Senior Secondary School Students in Zaria Metropolis, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13(02), 01-04. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-1302040104
• Varberg, D., Purcell, E.J., dan Rigdon, S.E. 2006. Calculus, 9th edition. Pearson, New York.
• Walsh, R., Fitzmaurice, O., & O Donoghue, J. (2017). What Subject Matter Knowledge do second-level teachers need to know to teach trigonometry? An exploration and case study. Irish Educational Studies, 3315(June), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1327361
• Watson, A. (2015). Task Design in Mathematics Education. (M. Ohtani, Ed.). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2
• Weber, K. (2005). Students’ understanding of trigonometric functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217423
• Weber, K. (2008). Teaching trigonometric functions: lessons learned from research. Mathematics Teacher, 102(2), 144-150. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/11a0/70bdd2ee0752756fa737955442087f7cafa0.pdf

APA

Maknun, C. L., Rosjanuardi, R., & Jupri, A. (2020). Didactical Design on Drawing and Analysing Trigonometric Functions Graph through a Unit Circle Approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9275

Vancouver

Maknun CL, Rosjanuardi R, Jupri A. Didactical Design on Drawing and Analysing Trigonometric Functions Graph through a Unit Circle Approach. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3):em0614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9275

AMA

Maknun CL, Rosjanuardi R, Jupri A. Didactical Design on Drawing and Analysing Trigonometric Functions Graph through a Unit Circle Approach. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3), em0614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9275

Chicago

Maknun, Churun Lu’lu’il, Rizky Rosjanuardi, and Al Jupri. "Didactical Design on Drawing and Analysing Trigonometric Functions Graph through a Unit Circle Approach". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 3 (2020): em0614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9275

Harvard

Maknun, C. L., Rosjanuardi, R., and Jupri, A. (2020). Didactical Design on Drawing and Analysing Trigonometric Functions Graph through a Unit Circle Approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9275

MLA

Maknun, Churun Lu’lu’il et al. "Didactical Design on Drawing and Analysing Trigonometric Functions Graph through a Unit Circle Approach". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, em0614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9275