Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving

Elizabeth de Freitas

doi:10.29333/iejme/220

Full Text (PDF)

Elizabeth de Freitas

More Detail

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the notion of ‘real life’ mathematical applications as possible sites for ethical reflection in school mathematics. I discuss problems with the ‘real’ in mathematics education, and show how these problems are often based on faulty cognitive theories of knowledge transfer. I then consider alternative visions of mathematical application and suggest that attention to classroom discourse and the craft of mathematics offer ways of introducing the ethical into school mathematics.

Keywords

Application
Ethics
Social Justice
Critical Mathematics Education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 3, Issue 2, May 2008, 79-95

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220

Publication date: 08 Aug 2008

Article Views: 3645

Article Downloads: 4233

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adler, J. (2001). Teaching Mathematics in Multilingual Classrooms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Boaler, J. & Greeno, G. (2000). Identity, Agency, and Knowingin Mathematical Worlds. in J. Boaler (Eds.). Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. London, UK: Alex Publishing.171-199.
Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1996). Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. Journal For Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477. COMAP, http://www.comap.com/highschool/contests/himcm/2006problems.html. Accessed on June 12, 2007.
Confrey, J. & Kazak, S. (2006). A Thirty Year Reflection on Constructivism in Mathematics Education. in A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.). Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Presentand Future. Rotterdam, ND: Sense Publishing. 367-402.
Cooper, B. (2001). Social Class and ‘Real Life’ Mathematics Assessments. in P. Gates (Eds.), Issues in Mathematics Teaching. New York: Routledge/Falmer. 245-258.
Cooper, B. (1998a). Assessing National Curriculum Mathematics in England: Exploring Children’s Interpretation of Key Stage 2 Tests in Clinical Interviews. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(1), 19-49.
Cooper, B. (1998b). Using Bernstein and Bourdieu to Understand Children’s Difficulties with ‘Realistic’ Mathematics Testing: an Exploratory Study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 511-32.
Cooper, B. & Dunne, M. (2004). Constructing the ‘Legitimate’ Goal of a ‘Realistic’ Maths Item: a Comparison of 10- 11 and 13-14 Year Olds. in B. Allen & S. Johnston-Wilder (Eds.). Mathematics Education: Exploring the Culture of Learning. New York: Routledge/Falmer. 69-90.
Davis, P. (2008). Applied Mathematics as Social Contract. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 22 (November). http://www.people.ex.ac.uk/pernest/pome22/index.htm.
de Abreu, G. (2002). Mathematics learning in out of school contexts: A cultural psychology perspective. In L.D. English (Ed.). Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 323-354.
de Freitas, E. (2004). Plotting intersections along the political axis: The interior voice of dissenting mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55. 259-274.
de Freitas, E. (2008a). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education 19 (1). 43-55
de Freitas, E. (2008b). Mathematics and its other: Dislocating the feminine. Gender and Education 20 (3). 281-290.
Dossey, J.A., McCrone, S., Giordano, F.R. & Weir, M.D. (2002). Mathematics methods and modeling for today’s mathematics classrooms: A contemporary approach to teaching grades 7-12. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole
Dowling, P. (1998). The Sociology of Mathematics Education: Mathematical myths/ Pedagogic Texts. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Ernest, P. (2001). Critical Mathematics Education. In P.Gates (Ed.). Issues in Mathematics Teaching. New York: Routledge/Falmer.
Ernest, P. (2004). Postmodernity and social research in mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 65-84.
Freire, P. (1970/1998). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M.B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
Gates, P. (2006). The place of equity and social justice in the history of PME. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.). Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. Rotterdam, ND: Sense Publishing. 367-402.
Greenfield, P. & Lave, J. (1982). Cognitive aspects of informal education. In D.A.
Wagner & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.). Cultural Perspectives in Childhood Development. San Fransisco: Freeman. 181-207.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gutstein, (2008). Building political relationships with students: An aspect of social justice pedagogy. In E. de Freitas & K. Nolan (Eds.). Opening the research text: Insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education. New York: Springer Verlag.
Gutstein, E. & Peterson, B. (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee, WS: Rethinking Schools.
Hersh, R. (2008). Ethics for mathematicians. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 22 (November). http://www.people.ex.ac.uk/PErnest/pome22/index.htm
Iyer, A., Leach, C.W., Pedersen, A. (2004). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group based emotions. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L. P. Pruitt, A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance, second edition (pp.345-361). New York, NY: Routledge.
Leach, C.W., Snider, N. & Iyer, A. (2002). Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate: The experience of relative advantage and the support for social equality. In I. Walker & H.J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp.136-163). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, P. & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). The socio-political context of the mathematics classroom: Using Bernstein’s theoretical framework to understand classroom communications. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.) Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 27-42.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister Outsider. 110-113. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics 61: 219-245.
Mukhopadhyay, S. & Greer, B. (2001). Modeling with purpose: Mathematics as a critical tool. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.). Socio-cultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. 295-312.
Povey, H., Burton, L., Angier, C. & Boylan, M. (2004). Learners as Authors in the Mathematics Classroom. In B. Allen & S. Johnston-Wilder (Eds.), Mathematics Education: Exploring the Culture of Learning. New York, NY: Routledge-Falmer.43-56.
Resnick, L.B., Pontecorvo, C. & Saljo, R. (1997). Discourse, tools and reasoning. In L.B. Resnick, C. Pontecorvo & R. Saljo (Eds.). Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition. New York: Sringer and Nato Scientific Affairs Division. 1-20.
Rodriguez, A.J. & Kitchen, R.S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
Rowland, T. (2008). Key note lecture. International Conference on Equity and Discourse: Creating Equitable discourse in the mathematics classroom. May 16, 2008, Rochester, NY.
SEAC (Schools Examinations and Assessment Council (1993). Pilot Standard Tests: Key Stage 2, London: SEAC/University of London.
Serra, M. (2008). Discovering geometry: An investigative approach. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Skovsmose, O & Borba, M. (2004). Research methodology and critical mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Skovsmose, O. (2008). Mathematics Education in a knowledge market: Developing functional and critical competencies. In In E. de Freitas & K. Nolan (Eds.). Opening the research text: Insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education. New York: Springer Verlag.
Tate, W. F. (2005). Race, retrenchment, and the reform of school mathematics. In E. Gutstein & B. Peterson (Eds.). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee, WS: Rethinking Schools. 31- 40.
Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.
Valero, P. & Zevenbergen, R. (Eds.). (2004). Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Walshaw, M. (2004). A powerful theory of active engagement. For the Learning of Mathematics. 4-10.
Walshaw, M. (Ed.).(2005). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics to students from socially disadvantaged backgrounds: Implications for social justice. In L. Burton (Ed.) Which way social justice and mathematics education? London, UK: Praeger Publishers.

How to cite this article

APA

Freitas, E. D. (2008). Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220

Vancouver

Freitas ED. Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2008;3(2):79-95. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220

AMA

Freitas ED. Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2008;3(2), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220

Chicago

Freitas, Elizabeth de. "Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2008 3 no. 2 (2008): 79-95. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220

Harvard

Freitas, E. D. (2008). Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), pp. 79-95. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220

MLA

Freitas, Elizabeth de "Critical Mathematics Education: Recognizing the Ethical Dimension of Problem Solving". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 3, no. 2, 2008, pp. 79-95. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/220