International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Baker, B., Hemenway, C., & Trigueros, M. (2000). On transformations of basic functions. In: H. Chick, K. Stacey, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference on the Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra (Vol. 1, pp. 41–47). University of Melbourne.
• Bingham, A. D. (2007). Teaching transformations of functions using modern dance: An experiment pairing a modern dance class with college algebra. Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. February 22 –25, 2007, San Diego - Mission Valley, California. http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2007/ papers/bingham.pdf
• Borba, M. C., & Confrey, J. (1996). A students‟ construction of transformations of functions in a multirepresentational environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(3), 319–337.
• Consciência, M. & Oliveira, H. (2011). Function concept and functions' transformations: The role of the graphic calculator. The Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Educatio, February 7-13, 2011, Rzeszów, Poland.
• Diković, L (2009), Applications GeoGebra into teaching some topics of Mathematics at the College Level, Computer Science and Information Systems , 6(2), 191-203.
• Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1994). On understanding how students learn to visualize function transformations. In: E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 45–68). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
• Faulkenberry, E. D. (2011). A conceptual approach to function transformations. In S. L. Reeder (Ed.),Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning (pp. 49-55). Cincinnati, OH: RCML.
• Karadag, Z., & McDougall, D. (2009a). Visual explorative approaches to learning mathematics. Atlanta, US: PME-NA.
• Karadag, Z. & McDougall, D. (2009b). Frame Analysis Method: Monitoring Metacognitive Activities. In T. Bastiaens et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp.934- 939). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Kimani, P. M. & Masingila, J. O. (2006). Calculus students' perceptions of the relationship among the concepts of function transformation, function composition, and function inverse. In A. S., Cortina, J.L., Sáiz, and Méndez, A.(Eds), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Mérida, México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, (Vol. 2, pp. 23-30).
• Lage, A. E. & Gaisman, M. T. (2006). An analysis of students‟ ideas about transformations of functions. In A. S., Cortina, J.L., Sáiz, and Méndez, A.(Eds), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Mérida, México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, (Vol. 2, pp. 68-70).
• Lyons, M., Lynch, K., Close, S., Sheerin, E. & Boland, S. (2003). Inside classrooms: the teaching and learning of mathematics in social context. IPA: Dublin.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
• Nguyen, D-H & Rebello, N. S. (2009). Students‟ Difficulties in Transfer of Problem Solving Across Representations. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference.
• Panaoura, A.; Elia, I.; Stamboulides, N. & Spyrou, P. (2009). Students‟ structure for the understanding of the axis of reflective symmetry in mathematics. Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae Mathematics, 9, 41-62.
• PBS MATHLINE (2013). Toothpicks and Transformations (Quadratic Functions). http://www.pbs.org/teachers/mathline/les sonplans/pdf/hsmp/toothpicks.pdf
• Sever, G. & Yerushalmy, M. (2007).To sense and to visualize functions: The case of graphs' stretching. In P. P. Demetra & P. George (Eds.), The Fifth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME5). (pp. 1509-1518). Larnaca: Department of Education, University of Cyprus.
• Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P. & Gadowsky, K. (2003). Conceptions of Function Translation: Obstacles, Intuitions, and Rerouting. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 22, 437– 450.

APA

Anabousy, A., Daher, W., Baya'a, N., & Abu-Naja, M. (2014). Conceiving Function Transformations in Different Representations: Middle School Students Working with Technology. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/284

Vancouver

Anabousy A, Daher W, Baya'a N, Abu-Naja M. Conceiving Function Transformations in Different Representations: Middle School Students Working with Technology. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2014;9(2):97-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/284

AMA

Anabousy A, Daher W, Baya'a N, Abu-Naja M. Conceiving Function Transformations in Different Representations: Middle School Students Working with Technology. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2014;9(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/284

Chicago

Anabousy, Ahlam, Wajeeh Daher, Nimer Baya'a, and Mohammad Abu-Naja. "Conceiving Function Transformations in Different Representations: Middle School Students Working with Technology". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2014 9 no. 2 (2014): 97-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/284

Harvard

Anabousy, A., Daher, W., Baya'a, N., and Abu-Naja, M. (2014). Conceiving Function Transformations in Different Representations: Middle School Students Working with Technology. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), pp. 97-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/284

MLA

Anabousy, Ahlam et al. "Conceiving Function Transformations in Different Representations: Middle School Students Working with Technology". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 9, no. 2, 2014, pp. 97-112. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/284