International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Andreyev, V. I. (2013). Systematization of the pedagogical and didactic laws integrative focused on the guaranteed quality of education. Education and self-development, 3(37), 3-10.
• Castro, M. E., Niño, A. & Muñoz-Caro, C. (2009) GMAT. A software tool for the computation of the rovibrational g matrix. Computer Physics Communications, 180(7), 1183-1187.
• Conner, M. (2006). Andragogy and Pedagogy. Direct access: http://agelesslearner.com/intros/andragogy.html.
• Elina, E.G., Kovtun, E.N. & Rodionova, S.E. (2015). Competences and results of training: logic of representation in educational programs. The higher education in Russia, 1, 10-20.
• Feldstein, D. I. (2009). Psychology of the person’s development as personality. Voronezh: MODEK. 454p.
• Implementation of “Education and training 2010” work programme. (2010, November 17). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. A Europian Reference Framework. Direct access: http://europa.eu.int/comm./education/policies/2010/doc/basicframe.pdf.
• Kolesnikov, A. K. & Lebedeva, I. P. (2012). Modelling of satisfaction of consumers with educational services of the higher school. The higher education in Russia, 12, 37-45.
• Krasinskaya, L. F. (2015). Teacher of the higher school: what kind should he be? The higher education in Russia, 1, 37-46.
• Maslova, N. F. & Abashina, A. D. (2009). Professional training of students during design studies. The higher education in Russia, 1, 170-173.
• McKenzie, J. (2001). How Teachers Learn Technology Best. The Educational Technology Journal. Direct access: http://fno.org/mar01/howlearn.html.
• Minayev, I., Vostrukhin, A., Vakhtina, E. & Ushkur, D. (2008). Creation of laboratory base of the advancing training. The higher education in Russia, 9, 10-14.
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and Researching: Language Learning Strategies. Harlow: Pearson Longman.116p.
• Race, Ph. (1993). Never mind the teaching – feel the learning. Birmingham: SEDA. 80p.
• Rbodes, F. T. (2001). The creation of the future. Ithaca. 34p.
• Sleeman, D. (1992). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press. 345p.
• Starodubtsev, V. A., Solovyov, M. A. & Valitova E. U. (2015). Pedagogical support of professional self-determination of students in higher education institution. The higher education in Russia, 1, 47-56.
• Thomas, G. P. (2012). Metacognition in Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. 425p.
• Vebter, E. V. & Safyannikov, I. A. (2010). Project-Organized Learning Method in the System of Engineering Education of Russia by the Example of National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University. Barcelona: Creating Meaningful Learning Environments. 178p.
• Zimnaya, I. A. (2001). Pedagogical psychology. Moscow: Logos. 384p.

APA

Koletvinova, N. D., & Bichurina, S. U. (2016). Cognitive Space of Professional Training of Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(4), 829-841.

Vancouver

Koletvinova ND, Bichurina SU. Cognitive Space of Professional Training of Students. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2016;11(4):829-41.

AMA

Koletvinova ND, Bichurina SU. Cognitive Space of Professional Training of Students. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2016;11(4), 829-841.

Chicago

Koletvinova, Natal’ya D., and Seimbika U. Bichurina. "Cognitive Space of Professional Training of Students". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 4 (2016): 829-841.

Harvard

Koletvinova, N. D., and Bichurina, S. U. (2016). Cognitive Space of Professional Training of Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(4), pp. 829-841.

MLA

Koletvinova, Natal’ya D. et al. "Cognitive Space of Professional Training of Students". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 4, 2016, pp. 829-841.