pp. 2773-2787 | Article Number: iejme.2016.229
Published Online: September 05, 2016
Article Views: 208 | Article Download: 244
The relevance of the research problem is determined by the intensity of modernization of Russian education, which includes the integration of Western technologies, traditions of the Soviet education and modern requirements to higher education in Russia. The aim of the article lies in justification of one of the most important for Russian education problem of the links between the teacher’s labour and quality of education of higher school graduate. A leading approach to the study of this problem is practice-oriented approach to the training of highly qualified specialists. The following results of the study were obtained: the situation in modern Russian education over the past decade was described, taking into account the change of educational paradigm; the idea that the accumulation of human capital by worker of higher school results in achieving the best results in the formation of students’ competences is justified; the methodology of control the level of formation of competences of university students as a result of the teacher’s labour is presented; the system of evaluating the level of formation of competences of students and graduates of the university is developed, indicators of which, obtained in its implementation in practice, can find application in the evaluation of the results of work of the teaching staff of the University. The article can be useful for researches in the field of education, teachers, postgraduates, undergraduates and students of pedagogical education.
Keywords: Сompetences; human capital; teacher’s labour; university graduate
Abakumova, N. N. (2011) Influence of a new wage system on the effectiveness of labour of scientific and pedagogical staff. The Manager, 2, 52-60.
Bagirova, A. & Scherbina, E. (2014) Graduate Competence as a Result of Professors Work. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2014, 3: Psychology and Psychiatry, Sociology and Healthcare, Education. Education and Educational Research, 325-332.
Baidenko, V. I. (2011) The bologna process: resume of the decada. Moscow: National University of Science and Technology «MISIS». 446p.
Bedrachuk, I. A. (2009) About payment for labour in universities. Siberian Financial School, 3, 108-113.
Bess, J. L., Anderson, C. H. & Murray, J. D. (1972) Professors – work and life styles among academicians. Journal of higher education, 43(8), 667-668.
Bianchetti, L. (2010) The bologna process and the intensification of university professors' work: interview with Josep M. Blanch. Educaco & Sociedade, 110(31), 263-285.
Bogomolova, I. S. & Kuleshova, K. G. (2012) Comparative analysis of wages’ systems in the sphere of higher professional education Southern Federal University News. The technics, 133(8), 21-29.
Charters, W. W. (1942) How Much Do Professors Work? Journal of higher education, 13(6), 298-301.
Chelyshkova, M. B. (2012) Assessment of university graduates in the framework of competence approach. Bulletin of Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov, 6 (6), 270-273.
Elkina, I. M. (2015) Accounting for learning outcomes in the educational process. Values and meanings, 35, 102–115.
Garner, R. (1987) Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood: Ablex. 165p.
Harlow, R. (2003) The effect of professors’ experiences and emotion management in the undergraduate college classroom. Social psychology quarterly, 66 (4), 348-363.
Kalimullin, A. M., Vlasova, V. K. & Sakhieva, R. G. (2016). Teachers’ training in the magistrate: Structural content and organizational modernization in the context of a federal university. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), 207-215.
Korneeva, A. A. (2007) Theoretical grounds of labour motivation of higher school teachers: PhD Abstract. Moscow: Russian State Social University. 26p.
Krasinskaya, L. F. (2006) Structure and content of professional activity of a teacher of the technics. Vestnik of Samara State University, 3(50), 26-34.
Kurgansky, S. I. (2006) The use of general-system attractors in managing the development of educational system of a University. Personality. Culture. Society, 3(4), 336–345.
Manokhina, O. A. (2013) Evaluation of quality of activity of University staff (faculty) as a method of labour organization. Human capital, 8, 59-62.
Maues, O. (2010). Reconfiguration of faculty work in higher education. Educar em Revista, 1, 141-160.
Nelyubin, N. I. (2014) Competence approach: gushing polysemy on the background of the methodological insufficiency. Values and meanings, 5(33), 75-83.
Norkin, G. A. (2012) Optimization of system of encouraging pedagogical and scientific activities of universities’ staff (faculty). Bulletin of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, 4, 163-166.
Ovchinnikov, M. V. & Tsiring, D. A. (2013) The Success Criteria of Scientific Pedagogic Activities. The Education and science journal, 1(2), 28-36.
Solomon, C. R. (2013) Sacrificing at the altar of tenure: Assistant professors' work/life management. Social science journal, 50(1), 143-152.
Struyven K., Dochy F. & Janssens S. (2005) Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 331–347.
Tkachenko, O. I. (2010) Teacher in XXI-st century: recommended directory. Chelyabinsk: Edition of S-USU. 147p.
Traynev, V. A., Mkrtchyan, S. S. & Savelyev, A. Ya. (2010) Improvement of quality of higher education and Bologna process. Summing up domestic and foreign practices. Moscow: Dashkov and Co. 329p.