pp. 1359-1371 | Article Number: iejme.2016.120
Published Online: August 04, 2016
Article Views: 187 | Article Download: 185
The paper describes the peculiarities of the experimental work organization to prepare master's degree students for research activities, and suggests a set of pedagogical conditions for this preparation under the conditions of the master program's educational process. To confirm the validity of the scientific theoretical assumptions, a plan is suggested with input and final diagnostics, intermediate tests, and several control and experimental groups. Master's degree students' preparedness for research activities was assessed by the following indicators: motivational-values attitude to the research, a set of research knowledge and skills and professionally significant personal qualities of the lecturer-researcher. Based on these indicators, three levels of master's degree students' preparedness for research activities were determined: reproductive, reproductive-creative and creative. The research determined that the master's degree students' reproductive level of preparedness for research activities is caused by insufficient attention, paid to this issue in the master's degree programs. The main solution to this problem is the implementation of the pedagogical conditions set to prepare master's degree students for research activities. The study showed the importance of the research results for the educational process of the master's degree course.
Keywords: Preparedness for research activities; master's degree student; experiment; pedagogical conditions; research activities
Adam, J. M. (2012). European-Russian-Central Asian Network of Master's degree Informatics as a Second Competence. Proceedings of Educon, 4, 722-729.
Anisimova, V. A. & Nain, A. A. (2012). The formation of research skills in students. Bulletin of South-Ural State University. Education. Pedagogical sciences, 14(273), 24-29.
Babanskiy, Y. K. (1989). Chosen pedagogical work. Moscow: Pedagogy. 234p.
Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 62p.
Carril, P. C. M., Sanmamed, M. G. & Sellés, N. H. (2013). Pedagogical roles and competencies of university teachers practicing in the e-learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 462-487.
Chervova, A. A. & Yaniuk, I. A. (2007). The research skills' formation in university students. Science and School, 6, 11-14.
Danielewicz, J. (2014). Teaching Selves: Identity, Pedagogy, and Teacher Education SUNY series, Teacher Preparation and Development. New York: State University of New York Press. 216p.
Derman, A. (2008, May 6-9). The primary school teachers' beliefs about science and technology literacy level. Paper presented at the 8th International Educational Technology Conference. Anadolu University, Turkey, 36-42.
Donovan, M. S. & Pellegrino, J. W. (2003). Learning and instruction: A SERP research agenda. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. 242p.
Grabes-Gissen, H. (1992). Science and new worldview. Berlin: German Academic Publishers. 275p.
Karsten, H., Topi, H., Brown, S. A., Carvalho, J. A., & Donnellan, B. (2015). Master's Degree Programs in Information Systems. Direct access: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.-cgi?article=1005&context=siged2015
Kiel, S. (1987). The university professor as a supervisor. Berlin: German Academic Publishers. 155p.
Maienschein, J. (1999). Commentary. Science Communication, 21(1), 75-87.
Merzon, E. E., Elena, E., Fayzullina, A. R., Ibatullin, R. R. & Krylov, D. A.. (2015). Organizational and pedagogical conditions of students' academic mobility development at school for higher professional education. European Studies Review, 7(1), 46-49.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education (2003). Developing Research and Communication skills. Philadelphia: Middle States Commission on Higher Education. 234p.
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1499-1521.
Rabei, I. (1996). What matters in the future? Max: The high school magazine, 6, 27-31.
Rudenko, I. V. (2015). Organizational and Pedagogical Conditions Development of General Competences Formation in the Educational Activities of the University. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(6), 45-48.
Stelma J. & Fay, R. (2014). Intentionality and developing researcher competence on a UK master's course: an ecological perspective on research education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 517-533.
Valeeva, R. A. & Karimova, L. S. (2014). Future Pedagogue-Psychologists' Social Competency Research and Pedagogical Conditions of its formation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 40-44.