pp. 3277-3288 | Article Number: iejme.2016.268
Published Online: November 08, 2016
Article Views: 640 | Article Download: 676
The purpose of the article is the empirical study of levels of professional and personal mobility of teaching staff at preschool educational institutions, as well as teachers of universities and colleges to identify ways and means of its improvement with the adoption of the pre-school education standard. Key methods of investigation, the results of which are provided in the article are: the analysis of scientific literature on the issue of research, empirical methods, including observation, expert evaluation, ranking, proprietary questionnaires and feedback forms, statistical analysis of data. Data obtained in the study are formed by individual questioning of 206 respondents during 2016. The study empirically detected levels of professional and personal mobility of teaching staff at preschool educational institutions, universities and colleges, i.e. cognitive, motivational and activity-based. The activity-based level of professional and personal mobility of all respondents as the ability to implement the standard of pre-school education and vocational educational effectiveness is not expressed clearly enough. Heads at preschool educational institutions have the lowest level of activity-based mobility. The results of the study allowed identifying common level indicators of professional and personal mobility of staffing at different levels of education in the implementation of the standard of preschool education: adaptive (low), practical (average) and creative (high). In general, the overall practical (average) level of professional and personal mobility with the implementation of the standard of preschool education prevails in all groups of respondents. The research results can be applied in practice to develop professional and personal mobility of executives, educators, speech therapists, psychologists at pre-school educational institutions, as well as teachers at universities and teacher training colleges in the conditions of the introduction of pre-school education standard.
Keywords: Professional and Personal Mobility of Staffing in the Context of Implementation of Pre-School Education Standard in Russia, Levels of Professional and Personal Mobility
Amirova, L.A. (2009). The development of teachers’ professional mobility in further education system: Doctorate Thesis (Pedagogy). Ufa. 401.
Amosova, O. V. (2000) Technology of preparing students for educational work in modern conditions. – Irkutsk : Publishing house of Irkutsk University. 102 p.
Barbieri, G., Rossetti, C., Sestito, P. (2011). The determinants of teacher mobility: Evidence using Italian teachers’ transfer applications, Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1430-1444.
Costner, D.V.W. (1990). Mobility patterns and personal characteristics of outstanding teachers in Florida. PhD Thesis. University of Central Florida.
Falch, T. (2011). Teacher mobility responses to wage changes: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. American Economic Review, 101, (3), 460-465.
Feng, L. (2009). Opportunity wages, classroom characteristics, and teacher mobility. Southern Economic Journal, 75, (4), 1165-1190.
Feng, L., Sass T.R. (2011). Teacher Quality and Teacher Mobility. Working Paper #57. Washington DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, 31.
Feng, L., Sass, T.R. (2008). Teacher Quality and Teacher Mobility. Mimeo. Florida State University, 32.
Goryunova, L.V. (2006) Professional mobility of a specialist as a problem of the developing education in Russia. Doctorate Thesis (Pedagogy). Rostov-on-Don, 427.
Kerdyasheva, O.V. (2010). Pedagogical conditions of formation of readiness for professional mobility of students in educational process at high school: PhD Thesis (Pedagogy). Voronezh, 204.
Kuzmina, N. V. (1970) Research Methods of pedagogical activity. Leningrad: Publishing house of Leningrad University, 114.
Kotmakova, T.B. (2009). The role of self-development in the process of formation of personal mobility. http:/www.t21.rgups.ru/doc2009/10/08.doc. Date accessed: 19.08.2016.
Luekens, M.T., Lyter, D.M., Fox, E.E. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the teacher followup survey. 2000–01 (NCES 2004-301).
McKinzie, F.L. (1981). Psychological horizontal mobility determiners of mail teachers employed in public school work in Missouri 1967-68 – 1976-77. PhD Thesis. University of Missouri – Columbia.
Merkulova, L.P. (2008). Formation of professional mobility of technical profile specialists by means of a foreign language: Abstract of PhD Thesis (Pedagogy). Samara, 40.
Mishchenko, V.A. (2008). Factors of formation of professional mobility in the higher education system. Bulletin of the Ugra State University, 4(11), 59-63.
Nedelko, E.G. (2007). Development of motivational readiness for students’ professional mobility at the university. PhD Thesis (Pedagogy), Magnitogorsk, 176.
Nemov R. S. (2007) Dictionary of psychology. Moscow: Vlados, 2007, 560.
Neprokina, I.V., Stepanova, I.A. (2015). Professional mobility of teachers as a prerequisite for modernization of contemporary preschool education. Young Scientist, 23, 993-995.
Nuzhnova, S.V. (2011). The concept of preparedness for occupational mobility in the educational process at high school. Bulletin of SUSU, 24, 68-72.
Ogarev, E.I. (1995). Competence of Education: The Social Aspect. St. Petersburg.
Petrovsky A.V. (1982) The Person. Activity. Collective. Moscow: Politizdat, 1982, 255.
Rickman, B.D., Parker, C.D. (1990). Alternative Wages and Teacher Mobility: A Human Capital Approach. Economics of Education Review, 9(1), 73-79.
Sergeeva, T.B. (2015). Personal and professional mobility: the problem of contingency. Education and Science, (8), 127.
Sinyolo, D. (2010). New Qualifications Comparability. Table reveals challenges for teacher mobility. EI Worlds of Education, 771-786.
Stefanovskaya T. A. (1998) Pedagogy: science and art. Moscow: Sovershenstvo, 1998, 368.
Shadrikov V. D. (1993) Philosophy of education and educational policies. Moscow: Logos, 181.
Vershinina L. V. (2003) Axiological educational space: valuable the consciousness of the teacher. Samara: Samara state pedagogical University, 150.
Yaroshevskii M. G., Sirotkina I. E. (1992) A pioneer of the activity approach. Psychological journal, 13, (6), 137-151.
Zeer, E.F., Morozova, S.A., Symanyuk, E.E. (2011). Professional mobility as the integral quality of the subject of innovation. Pedagogical Education in Russia, (5), 90-97.