pp. 211-220 | Article Number: mathedu.2015.016
Published Online: December 11, 2015
Article Views: 443 | Article Download: 484
The relevance of the present study is due to the tasks of assessing the quality of secondary education, which determine students’ subject knowledge along with their personal achievements, and where meta-subject skills define not only the level of educational results achieved, but also the prospects for the future high-quality training for a school graduate at any age. Thus, the purpose of the study conducted is to create approaches for making the system of tasks together with the criteria of their assessment to determine the level of students’ meta-subject results. The leading methods applied are modeling systems of open type tasks, with mathematical content and systematic analysis of large samples of experimental data, based on the evaluation of the two-point scale four parameters: the optimality of students’ proposed ideas, efficiency of reasoning, originality of their answer and development degree of their solutions. A pilot study conducted since 2008 has applied open tasks with mathematical content and the criteria for their assessment formed the approach to determine the level of high school students’ meta-subject results, expressed quantitatively in the form of an integrated assessment of the relative character – meta-subject intelligence quotient. Practical use of the intelligence quotient enables the making of accurate calculations for each age group in order to show the level of students’ meta-subject results. This in turn may determine the future direction of students’ individual development, and to ensure their transition to a higher level of meta-subject skills and, consequently, higher quality of education.
Keywords: Open Type Tasks, Mathematics, Meta-Subject
Bolotov, V.A. (2005). About the construction of the Russian system of education quality. Problems of education, 1, 5-11.
Bolotov, V.A. (2014). Becoming a nationwide system of education quality assessment. In the official website of the Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science. Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://www.obrnadzor.gov.ru/files/attest2007/46316820.doc.
Guilford, Y.P. (1967) The nature of human intelligence. N. Y.: Mc-Graw Hill.
Gorev, P.M., & Utemov, V.V. (2011). Formula creativity: We solve an open problem. Kirov, 288.
Government of the Russian Federation. (2008). Order of the Government of the Russian Federation from 17.11.2008 No.1662-r (ed. By 08.08.2009) “On the Concept of long-term social and economic development of the Russian Federation for the period till 2020”.
Kolomiets, B.K. (2003). Quality management of education: the invariant aspects. Moscow: Research center of problems of quality of training, Moscow state technological Academy.
Kovalenko, O.A., & Nikitin, E.K. (2013). Achieving results metasubject younger students in research situations in the classroom. Elementary School: plus or minus, 6, 67-73.
Mikhaylov, V.A., Gorev, P.M., & Utemov, V.V. (2014). Scientific Work: Methods of designing new ideas. Kirov.
Russian Academy of Education. (2008). Project of the Concept of the federal state educational standards for general education. Eds. A.M. Kondakov, & A.A. Kuznetsov Moscow: Education. Site of Center for Educational Quality Assessment Institute of content and teaching methods of the Russian Academy of Education. Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://www.centeroko.ru.
Subbeto, A.I. (2004). Quality of education: problems of assessment and monitoring. The head teacher, 5, 3.
The main results of an international study of quality of mathematical and natural science education TIMSS-2011. Analytical Report. (2013). Moscow: MAX Press.
Torrance, Е.P. (1964) Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, WJ: Prentice-Holl, 1964.
Tretyakov, P.I. (2002). Management of the quality of education is the main direction in development of the system: the nature, approaches, problems. The head teacher, 7, 67.
Utemov, V.V., Zinovkina, M.M., & Gorev, P.M. (2013). Pedagogy of creativity: Applied course of scientific creativity. Kirov.
Zheleznova, L.B. (2014). The effectiveness of educational activities in the field to. Retrieved August 20, 2014, from http://blank.orenipk.ru/Text/t43_1.htm.
Zinovkina, M.M., Gareev, R.T., Gorev, P.M., & Utemov, V.V. (2013). Scientific creativity: innovative methods in the system of multilevel continuous creative education NFTM-TRIZ. Kirov.