Submit a Manuscript

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
  • e-ISSN: 1306-3030
  • First published in 2006
JOURNAL ARCHIVE
The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment
Ali Bicer 1 * , Celal Perihan 2, Yujin Lee 3
1 University of Wyoming, USA2 Idaho State University, USA3 Texas A&M University, USA
* Corresponding Author
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Bicer A, Perihan C, Lee Y. The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2018;13(3), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3922
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Bicer et al., 2018)
Reference: Bicer, A., Perihan, C., & Lee, Y. (2018). The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3922
Chicago
In-text citation: (Bicer et al., 2018)
Reference: Bicer, Ali, Celal Perihan, and Yujin Lee. "The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2018 13 no. 3 (2018): 305-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3922
Harvard
In-text citation: (Bicer et al., 2018)
Reference: Bicer, A., Perihan, C., and Lee, Y. (2018). The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), pp. 305-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3922
MLA
In-text citation: (Bicer et al., 2018)
Reference: Bicer, Ali et al. "The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2018, pp. 305-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3922
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Bicer A, Perihan C, Lee Y. The Impact of Writing Practices on Students’ Mathematical Attainment. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2018;13(3):305-13. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3922

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the effects of writing intervention on students’ mathematical attainment based on their achievement (mathematics standardized test scores) and their attitudes toward mathematics (mathematical motivation and interest). Twelve studies with 19 effect sizes were selected for inclusion in the present meta-analysis. Results indicated that the overall effect size equalled 0.42. The small sample size (12 studies) in the present meta-analysis limits the generalizations that might be made regarding the overall impact of writing intervention on students’ mathematical attainment. However, the implication from the present study is that integrating writing into mathematics classrooms can be a useful instructional strategy to increase students’ mathematics success.

Keywords

integrating writing into mathematics writing in mathematics mathematical writing mathematical attainment

References

  • Bagley, T., & Gallenberger, C. (1992). Assessing Students’ Dispositions: Using Journal to Improve Students’ Performance. Mathematics Teacher, 85(8), 660-663. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27967836
  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The Effects of School Based Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543074001029
  • Bauman, M. A. (1992). The effect of teacher-directed journal writing on fifth-grade student mathematics achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(6), 1830A. UMI No. 9227116.
  • Bettencourt, C. (2009). Promoting Social Change through Writing: A Quantitative Study of Research-Based Best Practices in Eighth-Grade Mathematics. PhD diss. Walden University, TN. Proquest Dissertations Publishing (3379789).
  • Bicer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2013). Integrating Writing into Mathematics Classroom to Increase Students’ Problem Solving Skill. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 361-369. Retrieved from http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/Article/IOJES_1118.pdf
  • Cai, J., Magone, M. E., Wang, N., & Lane S. (1996). A Cognitive Analysis of QUASAR’s Mathematics Performance Assessment Tasks and Their Sensitivity to Measuring Changes in Middle School Students’ Thinking and Reasoning. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 19(3), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848959.1996.11670075
  • Coffey, H. (2009). The Relationship between Metacognition and Writing in Sixth Grade Mathematics. PhD diss. Dissertation Abstract International (UMI No. 3379789).
  • Cooper, H. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cross, D. I. (2009). Creating Optimal Mathematics Learning Environments: Combining Argumentation and Writing to Enhance Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics, 7, 905-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9144-9
  • Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a Mode of Learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/356095
  • Fried, M. N., & Amit, M. (2003). Some Reflections on Mathematical Classroom Notebooks and their Relationship to the Public and Private Nature of Students Practices. Educational Studies in Mathematic, 53(July), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025572900956
  • Ganguli, A. B. (1989). Integrating Writing in Developmental Mathematics. College Teaching, 37(4), 140-142. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27558364
  • Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2000). Writing in Knowledge-Building Communities. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 430-453.
  • Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and Relational Studies in Problem Solving: A Meta-Analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 242-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/749120
  • Jurdak, M., & Abu Zein, R. (1998). The Effect of Journal Writing on Achievement in and Attitudes toward Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 412-419. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/195204294?accountid=7082
  • Kreeft, J. (1984). Dialogue Journal Writing: Bridge from Talk to Essay Writing. Language Arts, 61(2), 141-150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41405149
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lopez, S. C. (2010). Towards Evidence-Based Practices in Mathematics Instruction: Investigating the Impact of Writing on Students Ability to Solve Mathematics Problems (PhD diss.), Loyola University Chicago. Retrieved from http://ecommons.luc.edLu/luc_diss/121
  • Meel, D. (1999). Email Dialogue Journals in a College Calculus Classroom: A Look at the Implementation and Benefits. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(4), 387-413.
  • Meiner, J., & Rishel, J. (1998). Writing in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
  • Morgan, C. (1994). Writing Mathematically. Mathematics Teaching, 146, 18-21.
  • Nahrgang, C. L., & Peterson, B. T. (1986). Using Writing to Learn Mathematics. Mathematics Reacher, 79, 461-465.
  • Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Teachers and Researchers’ Beliefs about the Development of Algebraic Reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/749750
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • National Writing Project, & Nagin, C. (2003). Because Writing Matters: Improving Student Writing in our Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Neria, D., & Amit, M. (2004). Students Preference of Non-Algebraic Representations in Mathematical Communication. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 409-416.
  • Parson, M. R. (2011). Effect of Writing to Learn in Pre-Calculus Mathematics on Achievement and Affective Outcomes for Students in a Community College Setting: A Mixed Method Approach (Unpublished PhD diss.), Colorado State University, CO.
  • Porter, M. K., & Masingila, J. O. (2000). Examining the Effects of Writing on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(2), 165-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3483283
  • Ross, J., & Dixon, F. (1994). College Algebra and Writing: A Pilot Project. In Final Report for the Title III.
  • Sierpinska, A. (1998). Three Epistemologies, Three Views of Classroom Communication: Constructivism, Sociocultural Approaches, Interactionism. In Language and Communication in the Mathematics Classroom, edited by H. Steinberg, M. G. B. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska, 30-62. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Stanton, J. (1984). Thinking together: Language interaction in children’s reasoning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 247 607).
  • Swafford, J., & Bryan, J. (2000). Instructional Strategies for Promoting Conceptual Change: Supporting Middle School Students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16, 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735600278006
  • Thompson, D., & Rubenstein, R. N. (2000). Learning Mathematics Vocabulary: Potential Pitfalls and Instructional Strategies. Mathematics Teacher, 93(7), 568-574. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27971502
  • Tosmur, N. (2004). The effects of journal writing on first year engineering students’ achievement on integral (Unpublished master’s thesis), Middle East Technical University, Turkey. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.633.3883&rep=rep1&type=pd

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2019