International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2016 - Volume 11 Issue 9, pp. 3289-3300
  • Published Online: 08 Nov 2016
  • Article Views: 823 | Article Download: 832
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Starostina SE, Kazachek NA, Tokareva JS. The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(9), 3289-3300.
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Starostina et al., 2016)
Reference: Starostina, S. E., Kazachek, N. A., & Tokareva, J. S. (2016). The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(9), 3289-3300.
Chicago
In-text citation: (Starostina et al., 2016)
Reference: Starostina, Svetlana E., Natalia A. Kazachek, and Julia S. Tokareva. "The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 9 (2016): 3289-3300.
Harvard
In-text citation: (Starostina et al., 2016)
Reference: Starostina, S. E., Kazachek, N. A., and Tokareva, J. S. (2016). The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(9), pp. 3289-3300.
MLA
In-text citation: (Starostina et al., 2016)
Reference: Starostina, Svetlana E. et al. "The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 9, 2016, pp. 3289-3300.
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Starostina SE, Kazachek NA, Tokareva JS. The Development of the Education Quality Assurance System in the Context of Socio-Economic Growth of the Cross-Border Region. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(9):3289-300.

Abstract

Modern high-tech production based on knowledge, the democratization of society and processes of globalization and regionalization form a new, dynamic labor market and actualize the problem of preparation of highly skilled professionals who ensure the stability of economic development and its integration into the world economic space. All this requires the educational institutions to not only constantly change and improve educational programs and technologies, but also to upgrade quality of higher education, due to the wide dissemination of guidelines for quality assurance in a cross-border higher education of UNESCO and OECD, as well as the creation of transparent intramural systems of education quality assurance for representatives of the labor market. The purpose of the article is to present the results of theoretical and empirical research problems of improving intramural system of education quality assurance, aimed at increasing the competitiveness and efficiency of the university management in terms of socio-economic development of the cross-border region.
The study was conducted by methods of comparative analysis, monitoring, foresight methods. The theoretical basis for the study was multi-standard approach. Practical implementation of the study is related to the development of the program of development of intramural system of education quality assurance, aimed at improving the competitiveness and efficiency of the management of the university. Consistency in the education quality assurance and confirmation of compliance of the system with the established international standards gives “credibility” on the part of the professional community and employers, and as a result, provides competitiveness in the domestic and international markets of educational services.

References

  • A report on the outcome of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Industrial Policy of the Trans-Baikal Territory for 2015 and tasks for 2016. http://xn--h1aakfkgb.xn--80aaaac8algcbgbck3fl0q.xn--p1ai/u/doklad_2.pdf.
  • Billing, D. (2004). International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity? Higher Education.  47(1), 113-137.DOİ:10.1023/B:HIGH.0000009804.31230.5e.
  • Borkach, E. (2014). Education Quality Guarantee Systems in Ukraine and Hungary. American Journal of Educational Research, 2 (12B), 7-10. DOI: 10.12691/education-2-12B-2.
  • Calof, J., Richards, G., Smith, J. (2015). Foresight, Competitive Intelligence and Business Analytics — Tools for Making Industrial Programmes More Efficient. Forsight, 9(1), 68-81. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2015.1.68.81.
  • Calof, J., Smith, J.  (2010). The integrative domain of foresight and competitive intelligence and its impact on R&D Management. R&D Management.40(1), 31-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00579.x.
  • Chief Information and Computing Centre.(2016) Informational and analytical materials on the results of monitoringthe effectiveness of the educational institutions of higher educationhttp://indicators.miccedu.ru/monitoring/?m=vpo.
  • Cole, B.R. (1995). Applying total quality management principles to faculty selection.Higher Education. 29, 1: 59-75. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01384241.
  • Csizmadia, T., Enders, J.,Westerheijden, D.F. (2008). Quality management in Hungarian higher education: organisational responses to governmental policy. Higher Education, 56(4), 439-455.
  • Dalkey N.C., Helmer-Hirschberg O. (1962).An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. RAND Report RM-727-PR. 27 P.
  • Fadeeva, Z., Galkute, L., Mader, C., Scott, G.,Mohun, S. (2014).Sustainable Development and Quality Assurance in Higher Education. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 284 P. http://www.palgrave.com/us/book/9781137459138.
  • Federal target program of education development for 2016-2020 approved by decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 497 of 23.05.2015.http://government.ru/media/files/uSB6wfRbuDS4STDe6SpGjaAEpM89lzUF.pdf.
  • Langfeldt, L., Stensaker, B., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., Westerheijden, D.F. (2010). The role of peer review in Norwegian quality assurance: potential consequences for excellence and diversity. Higher Education, 59(4), 391-405.
  • Letter from the President-sponsored National Council of the Russian Federation for Vocational Qualifications number NSPK-03/01 of 01.19.2016.
  • Martin B. R. (1995). Foresight in Science and Technology.Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.7(2), 139-68.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537329508524202
  • Method for Improving the Quality of Higher Education Based on the EFQM Model. (2015). The role of the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education ENQA latest development. https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiUusy8p87PAhVhMZoKHe4LDIEQFgglMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Ffile.PostFileLoader.html%3Fid%3D52f89e5dcf57d702048b46ab%26assetKey%3DAS%253A272156242448384%25401441898512648&usg=AFQjCNH2pjf4QGSLBI5ZqGfiT3_onQwQKg
  • Miles, I. (2007). Methods in Technology Foresight.UNIDO Regional Initiative on Technology.Foresight, Gebze (Turkey) November.http://vision.cer.uz/Data/lib/readings/manuals_and_toolkits/DEV_FORESIGHT_METHODS_EN_Nov2007.pdf.
  • Navodnov, V.G., Motova, G.N., Matveeva, O.A. (2012). Overview of principles of formation of intramural systems of education quality assurance. Yoshkar-Ola: Training and Consulting Center. 207 P.
  • OECD Better Policies for Better Lives.http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/reviewsofnationalpoliciesforeducation.htm.
  • Powdthavee, N., Lekfuangfu, W.N., Wooden, M. (2015). What’s the good of education on our overall quality of life? A simultaneous equation model of education and life satisfaction for Australia.Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.  54, 10–21. DOI:10.1016/0738-0593(90)90028-M.
  • Shah,M., Nair,S., Wilson,M. (2011). Quality assurance in Australian higher education: historical and future development. Asia Pacific Education Review. 12(3), 475-483. DOI: 10.1007/s12564-011-9152-2.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-011-9152-2.
  • Sokolov, A.V.(2007). Foresight: A look into the future. Foresight.1(1),  8-15.
  • Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area.European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.(2009). Helsinki, 3rdedition.39 P. http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ESG_3edition-2.pdf.
  • Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area.(2015). European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf.
  • Torino Process – Moving skills forward together. (2015). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001473/147363E.pdf.
  • Yirdaw, A. (2016). Quality of Education in Private Higher Institutions in Ethiopia: The Role of Governance. SAGE Open January-March, 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015624950.http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/spsgo/6/1/2158244015624950.full.pdf.
  • Yung-Chi Hou, A. (2011). Quality assurance at a distance: international accreditation in Taiwan higher education. Higher Education.61(2), 179-191.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.