International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2016 - Volume 11 Issue 7, pp. 2773-2787
  • Published Online: 05 Sep 2016
  • Article Views: 623 | Article Download: 536
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Dorozhkin EM, Leontyeva TV, Scherbina YY, Shchetynina AV, Pecherskaya EP. Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(7), 2773-2787.
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Dorozhkin et al., 2016)
Reference: Dorozhkin, E. M., Leontyeva, T. V., Scherbina, Y. Y., Shchetynina, A. V., & Pecherskaya, E. P. (2016). Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(7), 2773-2787.
Chicago
In-text citation: (Dorozhkin et al., 2016)
Reference: Dorozhkin, Evgenij M., Tatyana V. Leontyeva, Yelena Yu. Scherbina, Anna V. Shchetynina, and Evelina P. Pecherskaya. "Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 7 (2016): 2773-2787.
Harvard
In-text citation: (Dorozhkin et al., 2016)
Reference: Dorozhkin, E. M., Leontyeva, T. V., Scherbina, Y. Y., Shchetynina, A. V., and Pecherskaya, E. P. (2016). Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(7), pp. 2773-2787.
MLA
In-text citation: (Dorozhkin et al., 2016)
Reference: Dorozhkin, Evgenij M. et al. "Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 7, 2016, pp. 2773-2787.
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Dorozhkin EM, Leontyeva TV, Scherbina YY, Shchetynina AV, Pecherskaya EP. Teacher’s Labour as a Tool of Forming Human Capital of Higher School Graduates. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(7):2773-87.

Abstract

The relevance of the research problem is determined by the intensity of modernization of Russian education, which includes the integration of Western technologies, traditions of the Soviet education and modern requirements to higher education in Russia. The aim of the article lies in justification of one of the most important for Russian education problem of the links between the teacher’s labour and quality of education of higher school graduate. A leading approach to the study of this problem is practice-oriented approach to the training of highly qualified specialists. The following results of the study were obtained: the situation in modern Russian education over the past decade was described, taking into account the change of educational paradigm; the idea that the accumulation of human capital by worker of higher school results in achieving the best results in the formation of students’ competences is justified; the methodology of control the level of formation of competences of university students as a result of the teacher’s labour is presented; the system of evaluating the level of formation of competences of students and graduates of the university is developed, indicators of which, obtained in its implementation in practice, can find application in the evaluation of the results of work of the teaching staff of the University. The article can be useful for researches in the field of education, teachers, postgraduates, undergraduates and students of pedagogical education.

References

  • Abakumova, N. N. (2011) Influence of a new wage system on the effectiveness of labour of scientific and pedagogical staff. The Manager, 2, 52-60.
  • Bagirova, A. & Scherbina, E. (2014) Graduate Competence as a Result of Professors Work. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2014, 3: Psychology and Psychiatry, Sociology and Healthcare, Education. Education and Educational Research, 325-332.
  • Baidenko, V. I. (2011) The bologna process: resume of the decada. Moscow: National University of Science and Technology «MISIS». 446p.
  • Bedrachuk, I. A. (2009) About payment for labour in universities. Siberian Financial School, 3, 108-113.
  • Bess, J. L., Anderson, C. H. & Murray, J. D. (1972) Professors – work and life styles among academicians. Journal of higher education, 43(8), 667-668.
  • Bianchetti, L. (2010) The bologna process and the intensification of university professors' work: interview with Josep M. Blanch. Educaco & Sociedade, 110(31), 263-285.
  • Bogomolova, I. S. & Kuleshova, K. G. (2012) Comparative analysis of wages’ systems in the sphere of higher professional education Southern Federal University News. The technics, 133(8), 21-29.
  • Charters, W. W. (1942) How Much Do Professors Work? Journal of higher education, 13(6), 298-301.
  • Chelyshkova, M. B. (2012) Assessment of university graduates in the framework of competence approach. Bulletin of Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov, 6 (6), 270-273.
  • Elkina, I. M. (2015) Accounting for learning outcomes in the educational process. Values and meanings, 35, 102–115.
  • Garner, R. (1987) Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood: Ablex. 165p.
  • Harlow, R. (2003) The effect of professors’ experiences and emotion management in the undergraduate college classroom. Social psychology quarterly, 66 (4), 348-363.
  • Kalimullin, A. M., Vlasova, V. K. & Sakhieva, R. G.  (2016). Teachers’ training in the magistrate: Structural content and organizational modernization in the context of a federal university. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), 207-215.
  • Korneeva, A. A. (2007) Theoretical grounds of labour motivation of higher school teachers: PhD Abstract. Moscow: Russian State Social University. 26p.
  • Krasinskaya, L. F. (2006) Structure and content of professional activity of a teacher of the technics. Vestnik of Samara State University,  3(50), 26-34.
  • Kurgansky, S. I. (2006) The use of general-system attractors in managing the development of educational system of a University. Personality. Culture. Society, 3(4), 336–345.
  • Manokhina, O. A. (2013) Evaluation of quality of activity of University staff (faculty) as a method of labour organization. Human capital, 8, 59-62.
  • Maues, O. (2010). Reconfiguration of faculty work in higher education. Educar em Revista, 1, 141-160.
  • Nelyubin, N. I. (2014) Competence approach: gushing polysemy on the background of the methodological insufficiency. Values and meanings, 5(33), 75-83.
  • Norkin, G. A. (2012) Optimization of system of encouraging pedagogical and scientific activities of universities’ staff (faculty). Bulletin of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences4, 163-166.
  • Ovchinnikov, M. V. & Tsiring, D. A. (2013) The Success Criteria of Scientific Pedagogic Activities. The Education and science journal, 1(2), 28-36.
  • Solomon, C. R. (2013) Sacrificing at the altar of tenure: Assistant professors' work/life management. Social science journal, 50(1), 143-152.
  • Struyven K., Dochy F. & Janssens S. (2005) Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 331–347.
  • Tkachenko, O. I. (2010) Teacher in XXI-st century: recommended directory. Chelyabinsk: Edition of S-USU. 147p.
  • Traynev, V. A., Mkrtchyan, S. S. & Savelyev, A. Ya. (2010) Improvement of quality of higher education and Bologna process. Summing up domestic and foreign practices. Moscow: Dashkov and Co. 329p.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.