International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2016 - Volume 11 Issue 7, pp. 2571-2580
  • Published Online: 03 Sep 2016
  • Article Views: 574 | Article Download: 692
  • Open Access Full Text (PDF)
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Petrovskaya MV, Zaitseva NA, Bondarchuk NV, Grigorieva EM, Vasilieva LS. Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(7), 2571-2580.
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Petrovskaya et al., 2016)
Reference: Petrovskaya, M. V., Zaitseva, N. A., Bondarchuk, N. V., Grigorieva, E. M., & Vasilieva, L. S. (2016). Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(7), 2571-2580.
Chicago
In-text citation: (Petrovskaya et al., 2016)
Reference: Petrovskaya, Maria V., Natalia A. Zaitseva, Natalya V. Bondarchuk, Elena M. Grigorieva, and Ludmila S. Vasilieva. "Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 7 (2016): 2571-2580.
Harvard
In-text citation: (Petrovskaya et al., 2016)
Reference: Petrovskaya, M. V., Zaitseva, N. A., Bondarchuk, N. V., Grigorieva, E. M., and Vasilieva, L. S. (2016). Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(7), pp. 2571-2580.
MLA
In-text citation: (Petrovskaya et al., 2016)
Reference: Petrovskaya, Maria V. et al. "Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 7, 2016, pp. 2571-2580.
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Petrovskaya MV, Zaitseva NA, Bondarchuk NV, Grigorieva EM, Vasilieva LS. Scientific Methodological Basis of the Risk Management Implementation for Companies’ Capital Structure Optimization. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(7):2571-80.

Abstract

The relevance of studying the issues related to the risk management implementation for companies’ financial management system advancement is explained with the research among scientific methodological studies and commercial enterprises’ practical activities of some ways to optimize the capital structure taking into account various factors that impact on this structure. There are no methodological and practical guidelines for solving the given problems. Basing on the employment of the theory-empiric methods of investigation a unifying model of commercial enterprises’ risks evaluation and management has been developed. The novelty of the investigation results consists in working out a matrix of the main reasons for analyzed risks arising and of a relationship model “risk-reason” that helps to estimate the most important causes for each basic risk and to evaluate the probability of every cause occurrence. Moreover, the authors have proposed and described a relationship matrix “risk-reason”: find out a critical cause having the greatest impact on the company’s activity riskiness, put the causes in order of occurrence frequency, set a rating for the essentiality of the cause impact on company’s activity risk. Applying the methodological approaches of the risk management implementation for companies’ capital structure optimization for real business would let to improve the financial management efficiency leading to the raise of enterprise business performance results.

References

  • Arnoud, W. A. (2011) Boot and Anjan V. Thakor Managerial Autonomy, Allocation of Control Rights, and Optimal Capital Structure. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 3434 – 3485 .
  • Bhamra, S., Kuehn, L. & Strebulaev, I., (2010) The Aggregate Dynamics of Capital Structure and Macroeconomic Risk. Review of Financial Studies, 23(12), 4187-4241.
  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A. & Marcus, A. (2002) Investment principles, Moscow: Williams. 994p.
  • Braley, R. & Myers, S. (2008) Principles of corporate Finance. 2nd Rus. ed. (transl. by N. Baryshnikova 7-th Intern. ed.). Moscow: Olimp-Biznes. 1008p.
  • Damodaran, A. (2004) Investment evaluation. Tools and technology of evaluation of any assets. Translated from English. Moscow: Al'pina –Biznes. 1342p.
  • Dzhandzhugazova, E. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Larionova, A. A., Petrovskaya, M. V. & Chaplyuk, V. Z. (2015) Methodological Aspects of Strategic Management of Financial Risks during Construction of the Hotel Business. Asian Social Science, 11(10), 229-234.
  • Elsas, R., Flannery, M. J., & Garfinkel, J.A. (2014) Financing Major Investments: Information about Capital Structure Decisions. Review of Finance, 18, 1341 – 1386
  • Fischer, E. O., Heinkel, R. & Zechner, J. (1989) Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests. Journal of Finance, 44, 1, 19-40.
  • Frank, M. Z. & Goyal, V. K. (2009) Capital Structure Decisions: Which Factors are Reliably Important?  Journal of Finance, 39, 1067—1089
  • Kokoreva, M. (2012) Financial Architecture and Corporate Performance. Corporate finance, 2(22), 34–44.
  • Levy, A. (2007) Why does capital structure choice vary with macroeconomic conditions? Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1545 – 1564
  • Lubnina, A. A., Shinkevich, M. V., Ashmarina, S. I., Zaitseva, N. A., Sayfutdinova, G. B. & Ishmuradova,I. I. (2016) Resource Saving Innovative Forms of the Industrial Enterprises. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 479-483.
  • Malysheva, T. V., Shinkevich, A. I., Kharisova, G. M., Nuretdinova, Y. V., Khasyanov, O. R., Nuretdinov, I. G., Zaitseva, N. A. & Kudryavtseva, S. S.(2016) The sustainable development of competitive enterprises through the implementation of innovative development strategy. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 185-191.
  • Miglo, A. (2016) Capital Structure in the Modern World. Macmillan: Publisher Palgrave Macmillan. 274p.
  • Petrovskaya,M. V., Larionova, A. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Bondarchuk, N. V., Grigorieva, E. M. (2016) Methodical approaches to determine the level of risk associated with the formation of the capital structure in conditions of unsteady economy. International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, 11, 4005-4014.
  • Porras, E. (2011) The Cost of Capital Publisher Palgrave Macmillan: eBook. 246p.
  • Rajan, R. & Gopalan, S. (2015) Economic Management in a Volatile Environment Publisher Palgrave Macmillan: eBook. 283p.
  • Rudenko, L. G., Zaytseva, N. A., Dzhandzhugazova, E. A., Petrovskaya, M. V. & Larionchikova, V. N. (2015) Conceptual Foundations of Management of Infrastructure of Support for Small Entrepreneurship. Asian Social Science, 11(10), 220-228
  • Zadorozhna, A. N. (2015) Arrangements for using the volatility method EBIT and the analysis model EBIT-EPS in making financial decisions. Financial analytics: problems and solutions, 36(270), 24-37.
  • Zoppa, A. (2002) Pecking order theory and the financial structure of manufacturing SMEs from Australia's Business Longitudinal Survey, 29, Direct access http://www.flinders.edu.au/sabs/business-files/research/papers/2002/02-01.pdf

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.