International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Abdul Rahman S. Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2019;14(1), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3999
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Abdul Rahman, 2019)
Reference: Abdul Rahman, S. (2019). Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3999
Chicago
In-text citation: (Abdul Rahman, 2019)
Reference: Abdul Rahman, Shafia. "Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2019 14 no. 1 (2019): 233-241. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3999
Harvard
In-text citation: (Abdul Rahman, 2019)
Reference: Abdul Rahman, S. (2019). Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), pp. 233-241. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3999
MLA
In-text citation: (Abdul Rahman, 2019)
Reference: Abdul Rahman, Shafia "Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 1, 2019, pp. 233-241. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3999
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Abdul Rahman S. Example Construction as a Devise to Reveal Awareness of Calculus Integration. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2019;14(1):233-41. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3999

Abstract

Meaningful mathematics learning requires creating opportunities for learners to make use of their awareness to contact important mathematical structures. Four first year undergraduates studying engineering, mathematics and education were invited to construct examples meeting specified constraints in order to investigate their awareness of Integration. Findings suggest that the examples they constructed reflected the nature of their awareness of the topic and aspects of the topic that dominated the students’ attention.

References

  • Abdul Rahman, S. (2005). Learning with Examples and Students’ Understanding of Integration. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 24-28.
  • Bezuidenhout, J., & Oliver, A. (2000). Students’ conceptions of the integral. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.). Proceedings of the 24th Congress of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 73-80. Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Czarnocha, B., Dubinsky, E., Loch, S., Prabhu, V., & Vidakovic, D. (2001). Conceptions of area: In students and in history. The College Mathematics Journal, 32(2), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2687114
  • Dahlberg, R., & Housman, D. (1997). Facilitating learning events through example generation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002999415887
  • Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1991). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics (pp. 25-37). MAA Notes No. 19.
  • Gattegno, C. (1987). The Science of Education, Part I: Theoretical Considerations. New York: Educational Solutions.
  • González-Martín, A.S., Bloch, I., Durand-Guerrier, V. & Maschietto, M. (2014). Didactic Situations and Didactical Engineering in university Mathematics: Cases from the study of Calculus and Proof. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918347
  • Gray, E. M. & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 115-141. https://doi.org/10.2307/749505
  • Griffin, P., & Gates, P. (1989). Project Mathematics UPDATE: PM753A, B, C, D, Preparing to teach angle, equations, ratio and probability. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
  • Hazzan, O., & Zazkis, R. (1999). A perspective on “Give an example” tasks as opportunities to construct links among mathematical concepts. FOCUS on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 27 (4), 1-14.
  • Hong, Y. Y., & Thomas, M. O. J. (1998). Versatile Understanding of integration, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics Instruction - South East Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, Seoul, Korea, 255-265.
  • Huang, C. H. (2012). The role of examples in the learning of definite integral. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 10(4), 236-240.
  • Jones, S. R. (2013). Understanding the integral: Students’ symbolic forms. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 32(2), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.004
  • Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology (pp. 1-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9 (2), 2-8.
  • Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004a). Designing and using mathematical tasks. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University. (2006 reprint: St. Albans, UK: QED).
  • Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004b). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410540
  • Rasslan, S., & Tall, D. (2002). Definitions and images for the definite integral concept. In Cockburn A. and Nardi, E. (Eds). Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Norwich, United Kingdom, 4, 89-96.
  • Sealey, V. (2006). Definite integrals, Reimann sums, and area under a curve: What is necessary and sufficient? In Alatorre, S., Cortina, J., Sáiz, M. & Méndez, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 46-53). Mérida, México: Universidad Pedagogica Nacional.
  • Swinyard, C. (2011). Reinventing the formal definition of limit: The case of Amy and Mike. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 30 (2), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.01.001
  • Tall, D. (1993). Students’ difficulties in calculus. Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’ Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada, 13-28.
  • Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
  • Tsamir, P. (2007). Should more than one theoretical approach be used for analyzing students’ errors? The case of areas, volumes and integration. Learn Math, 27(2), 28-33.
  • Sfard, A. (1994). Reification as a birth of a metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 44-55.
  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a Constructive Activity: The role of learner-generated examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040410.57253.a1
  • Zaslavsky, O., & Lavie, O. (2005). Teachers’ use of instructional examples. Proceedings of the 15th ICMI study conference: The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics. Águas de Lindóia, Brazil.
  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2007). Generating examples: From pedagogical tool to a research tool. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 15-21.
  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: a case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9131-7
  • Zhu, S., & Simon, (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0403_1

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.